Skipping a generation and assisting conception

Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered

Volumn 15, Issue , 2009, Pages 138-158

  Edwards, Jeanette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649727427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Basu, P. 2007. Homecomings: Genealogy, Heritage-tourism and Identity in the Scottish Highland Diaspora. London: Routledge.
2. Bouquet, M. 1993. Reclaiming English Kinship: Portugese Refractions of British Kinship Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
3. Bouquet, M. 2000. 'Reconnecting Kinship Studies and Museum Collections', in J. Carsten (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167-90.
4. Burke, J. and P. Harris. 2000. 'Infertile Men Turn to their Fathers for Sperm', Observer, 19 November.
5. Douglas, M. 1970. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6. Edwards, J. 1999. 'Why Dolly Matters: Culture, Kinship and Cloning', Ethnos 64(3): 301-24.
7. Edwards, J. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Edwards, J. 2004. 'Incorporating Incest: Gamete, Body and Relation in Assisted Conception', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(4): 755-74.
9. Edwards, J. 2005. '"Make-up": Identity, Upbringing and Character', Ethnos 70(3): 413-31.
10. Edwards, J., S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price and M. Strathern. 1999. Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, 2nd edition. London:Routledge.
11. Edwards, J. and M. Strathern. 2000. 'Including Our Own', in J. Carsten (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 149-66.
12. Héritier, F. 1999. Two Sisters and Their Mother: The Anthropology of Incest, trans. J. Herman. New York: Zone Books.
13. Ingold, T. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.
14. Malkki, L. 2001. 'Figures of the Future: Dystopia and Subjectivity in the Social Imagination of the Future', in D. Holland and J. Lave (eds), History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities. Oxford:James Curry, pp. 325-48.
15. Marre, D. and Bestard, J. 2008. 'The Family Body: Persons, Bodies and Resemblances', in J. Edwards and C. Salazar (eds), European Cultures of Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
16. Nash, C. 2002. 'Genealogical Identities', Environment and Planning 20(1): 27-52.
17. Pálsson, G. Forthcoming. Anthropology and the New Genetics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. Schneider, D. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Schneider, D. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Stolcke, V. 1986. 'New Reproductive Technologies - Same Old Fatherhood', Critique of Anthropology 6(3): 5-32.
21. Strathern, M. 1999. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.
22. Strathern, M. 2002. 'Still Giving Nature a Helping Hand? Surrogacy: A Debate about Technology and Society', Journal of Molecular Biology 319(4): 985-93.
23. Thompson, C. 2001. 'Strategic Naturalizing: Kinship in an Infertility Clinic', in S. Franklin and S. McKinnon (eds), Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 175-202.