Why dolly matters: Kinship, culture and cloning

Ethnos

Volumn 64, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 301-324

  Edwards, Jeanette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cloning; Culture; England; Kinship; Social class

Indexed keywords

EID: 85063701727     PISSN: 00141844     EISSN: 1469588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00141844.1999.9981606     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arditti, R., Duelli-Klein, R., and Minden, S., eds. 1984. Test-tube Women: What Future for Motherhood?, London: Virago.
2. Balsamo, A., 1996. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women, Durham: Duke University Press.
3. Bartholet, E., 1993. Family Bonds: Adoption and the Politics of Parenting, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Battaglia, D., 1995. Fear of Selfing in the American Cultural Imaginary or ‘You Are Never Alone With A Clone’. American Anthropologist, 97(4): 672–678.
5. Carsten, J., ed. 1999. Cultures of Relatedness: New Directions in Kinship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Corea, G., 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, New York: Harper & Row.
7. Delaney, C., 1991. The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society, Berkeley: University California Press.
8. Duden, B., 1993. Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the Unborn, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
9. Duster, T., 1990. Backdoor to Eugenics, Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10. Duden, B. 1996. “ The Prism of Heritability and the Sociology of Knowledge ”. In Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power, and Knowledge, Edited by: Nader, L., New York and London: Routledge.
11. Edwards, J., 1995. “ Imperatives to Reproduce: Views from North-West England on Fertility in the Light of Infertility ”. In Reproductive Decisions: Biological and Anthropological Perspectives, Edited by: Dunbar, R., London: Macmillan.
12. Duden, B. 1999. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Edwards, J., 1993. “ Explicit Connections: Ethnographic Enquiry in North-West England ”. In Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, 2nd edition, Manchester Manchester University Press London: Routledge. 1999
14. Duden, B. 1999. “ Clones Who Are They? ”. In Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, London: Routledge.
15. Edwards, J., and Strathern, M., 1999. “ Including our Own ”. In Cultures of Relatedness:New Directions in Kinship, Edited by: Carsten, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Fox-Keller, E., 1995. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology, New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Franklin, S., 1992. “ Making Sense of Missed Conceptions: Anthropological Perspectives on Unexplained Infertility ”. In Changing Human Reproduction, Edited by: Stacey, M., London: Sage.
18. Fox-Keller, E. 1995. “ Postmodern Procreation: A Cultural Account of Assisted Reproduction ”. In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, Edited by: Ginsburg, F., and Rapp, R., Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Handler, R., ed. 1995. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other Anthropological Stories, Durham: Duke University Press.
20. Haraway, D., 1997. Modest_Witness:@Second Millennium. Female Man@_Meets_Onco Mouse TM: Feminism and Technoscience, London: Routledge.
21. Harding, S., ed. 1993. The Racial Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
22. Hartouni, V., 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23. hooks, b., 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Centre, Boston: South End Press.
24. Hubbard, R., 1990. The Politics of Women's Biology, New Brunswick: Rutgers.
25. Kevles, D. J., 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (1985)
26. Kolata, G., 1997. Clone: the Road to Dolly and the Path Ahead, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
27. Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, Edited by: Porter, Catherine. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
28. Lock, M., 1998. Breast Cancer: Reading the Omens. Anthropology Today, 14(4): 7–16.
29. Lundin, S., 1999. The Boundless Body: Cultural Perspectives on Xenotransplantation. Ethnos, 64(1): 15–31.
30. Muller, H., 1936. Out of the Night: A Biologist's View of the Future, London: Gollancz.
31. Nelkin, D., and Lindee, S., 1995. The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon, New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.
32. Price, F., 1997. “ Matchmaking in the Clinic: Gamete Donation and the Management of Difference ”. In Culture, Kinship and Genes: Towards Cross-cultural Genetics, Edited by: Clarke, A., and Parsons, E., London: Macmillan.
33. Pfeffer, N., 1993. The Stork and the Syringe: A Political History of Reproductive Medicine, Cambridge: Polity.
34. Rose, H., 1994. Love, Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences, Cambridge: Polity.
35. Ragoné, H., 1994. Conception in the Heart: Surrogate Motherhood in America, Boulder & London: Westview.
36. Schneider, D., 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account, 2nd edition, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 1980. Chicago: Chicago University Press
37. Ragoné, H. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship, Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
38. Spallone, P., 1997. “ Technologies of Reproduction: Why Women's Issues make a Difference ”. In Science and the Construction of Wimen, Edited by: Maynard, M., London: UCL Press.
39. Stabile, C., 1994. Feminism and the Technological Fix, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
40. Stack, C., 1974. All our Kin: Strategies of Surviving in a Black Community, New York: Harper and Row.
41. Stanworth, M., ed. 1987. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine, Cambridge: Polity.
42. Stewart, C., 1997. An Udder Way of Making Lambs. Nature, 385 Feb.
43. Stolcke, V., 1986. New Reproductive Technologies: Same Old Fatherhood. Critique of Anthropology, 6: 5–32.
44. Stewart, C. 1998. “ El sexo de la biotecnología ”. In Genes en el laboratorio y en la fábrica, Edited by: Durán, A., and Riechman, J., Madrid: Editorial Trotta y Fundación 1° de mayo.
45. Strathern, M., 1981. Kinship at the Core: An Anthropology of Elmdon, a Village in Northwest Essex, in the 1960s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Stewart, C. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Strathern, M. 1992b. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
48. Stewart, C. 1993. “ Introduction ”. In Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, 2nd edition, Edited by: Edwards, J., Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1999. London: Routledge
49. Weston, K., 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship, New York: Colombia University Press.
50. Williams, R., 1989. Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism, London and New York: Verso.
51. Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J., and Campbell, K.H.S., 1997. Viable Offspring derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells. Nature, 385: 810–813.