메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 195, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

Revising a manuscript: Ten principles to guide success for publication

Author keywords

Manuscript; Publication; Reviewers; Revision

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 78649720286     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5553     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (27)

References (12)
  • 1
    • 0025897082 scopus 로고
    • Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR
    • Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. AJR 1991; 156:627-632
    • (1991) AJR , vol.156 , pp. 627-632
    • Chew, F.S.1
  • 2
    • 27744472501 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing it up: A step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators
    • Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR 2005; 185:591-596
    • (2005) AJR , vol.185 , pp. 591-596
    • Kliewer, M.A.1
  • 3
    • 26944494572 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript
    • Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res 2005; 128:165-167
    • (2005) J Surg Res , vol.128 , pp. 165-167
    • Cetin, S.1    Hackam, D.J.2
  • 4
    • 34247604386 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript
    • Provenzale JM. Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript. AJR 2007; 188:1179-1182
    • (2007) AJR , vol.188 , pp. 1179-1182
    • Provenzale, J.M.1
  • 6
    • 29844444319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
    • Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854
    • (2005) AJR , vol.185 , pp. 848-854
    • Provenzale, J.M.1    Stanley, R.J.2
  • 7
    • 77955594954 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proposal of a method for deciding whether an AJR manuscript merits publication: The 25% rule
    • Provenzale JM. Proposal of a method for deciding whether an AJR manuscript merits publication: the 25% rule. AJR 2010; 195:278-280
    • (2010) AJR , vol.195 , pp. 278-280
    • Provenzale, J.M.1
  • 8
    • 3042779660 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to reply to referees' comment when submitting manuscripts for publication
    • Williams HC. How to reply to referees' comment when submitting manuscripts for publication. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:79-83
    • (2004) J Am Acad Dermatol , vol.51 , pp. 79-83
    • Williams, H.C.1
  • 9
    • 0023049868 scopus 로고
    • The joys of revising a manuscript
    • (editorial)
    • Morgan PP. The joys of revising a manuscript. (editorial) CMAJ 1986; 134:1328
    • (1986) CMAJ , vol.134 , pp. 1328
    • Morgan, P.P.1
  • 10
    • 0030607607 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
    • Pierie JP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJ. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. Lancet 1996; 348:1480-1483
    • (1996) Lancet , vol.348 , pp. 1480-1483
    • Pierie, J.P.1    Walvoort, H.C.2    Overbeke, A.J.3
  • 11
    • 76649119083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dealing with returned manuscripts
    • Peh WC, Ng KH. Dealing with returned manuscripts. Singapore Med J 2009; 50:1050-1052
    • (2009) Singapore Med J , vol.50 , pp. 1050-1052
    • Peh, W.C.1    Ng, K.H.2
  • 12
    • 34848916965 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript revision strategies
    • Conn VS. Manuscript revision strategies. West J Nurs Res 2007; 29:786-788
    • (2007) West J Nurs Res , vol.29 , pp. 786-788
    • Conn, V.S.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.