-
1
-
-
0025897082
-
Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR
-
Chew FS. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. AJR 1991; 156:627-632
-
(1991)
AJR
, vol.156
, pp. 627-632
-
-
Chew, F.S.1
-
2
-
-
27744472501
-
Writing it up: A step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators
-
Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR 2005; 185:591-596
-
(2005)
AJR
, vol.185
, pp. 591-596
-
-
Kliewer, M.A.1
-
3
-
-
26944494572
-
An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript
-
Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res 2005; 128:165-167
-
(2005)
J Surg Res
, vol.128
, pp. 165-167
-
-
Cetin, S.1
Hackam, D.J.2
-
4
-
-
34247604386
-
Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript
-
Provenzale JM. Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript. AJR 2007; 188:1179-1182
-
(2007)
AJR
, vol.188
, pp. 1179-1182
-
-
Provenzale, J.M.1
-
6
-
-
29844444319
-
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
-
Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR 2005; 185:848-854
-
(2005)
AJR
, vol.185
, pp. 848-854
-
-
Provenzale, J.M.1
Stanley, R.J.2
-
7
-
-
77955594954
-
Proposal of a method for deciding whether an AJR manuscript merits publication: The 25% rule
-
Provenzale JM. Proposal of a method for deciding whether an AJR manuscript merits publication: the 25% rule. AJR 2010; 195:278-280
-
(2010)
AJR
, vol.195
, pp. 278-280
-
-
Provenzale, J.M.1
-
8
-
-
3042779660
-
How to reply to referees' comment when submitting manuscripts for publication
-
Williams HC. How to reply to referees' comment when submitting manuscripts for publication. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:79-83
-
(2004)
J Am Acad Dermatol
, vol.51
, pp. 79-83
-
-
Williams, H.C.1
-
9
-
-
0023049868
-
The joys of revising a manuscript
-
(editorial)
-
Morgan PP. The joys of revising a manuscript. (editorial) CMAJ 1986; 134:1328
-
(1986)
CMAJ
, vol.134
, pp. 1328
-
-
Morgan, P.P.1
-
10
-
-
0030607607
-
Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
-
Pierie JP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJ. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. Lancet 1996; 348:1480-1483
-
(1996)
Lancet
, vol.348
, pp. 1480-1483
-
-
Pierie, J.P.1
Walvoort, H.C.2
Overbeke, A.J.3
-
11
-
-
76649119083
-
Dealing with returned manuscripts
-
Peh WC, Ng KH. Dealing with returned manuscripts. Singapore Med J 2009; 50:1050-1052
-
(2009)
Singapore Med J
, vol.50
, pp. 1050-1052
-
-
Peh, W.C.1
Ng, K.H.2
-
12
-
-
34848916965
-
Manuscript revision strategies
-
Conn VS. Manuscript revision strategies. West J Nurs Res 2007; 29:786-788
-
(2007)
West J Nurs Res
, vol.29
, pp. 786-788
-
-
Conn, V.S.1
|