-
5
-
-
27744472501
-
Writing it up: A step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators
-
Kliewer MA. Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:591-596.
-
(2005)
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
, vol.185
, pp. 591-596
-
-
Ma, K.1
-
6
-
-
26944494572
-
An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript
-
Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res. 2005;128:165-167.
-
(2005)
J Surg Res.
, vol.128
, pp. 165-167
-
-
Cetin, S.1
Hackam, D.J.2
-
7
-
-
0346413326
-
Teaching Students How to Read and Write Science: A Mandatory Course on Scientific Research and Communication in Medicine
-
DOI 10.1097/00001888-200312000-00007
-
7. Marusic A, Marusic M. Teaching students how to read and write science: a mandatory course on scientific research and communication in medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:1235-1239. (Pubitemid 37523032)
-
(2003)
Academic Medicine
, vol.78
, Issue.12
, pp. 1235-1239
-
-
Marusic, A.1
Marusic, M.2
-
8
-
-
28044445101
-
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
-
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569-16572.
-
(2005)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
, vol.102
, pp. 16569-16572
-
-
Hirsch, J.E.1
-
9
-
-
36849052981
-
How to write a scientific masterpiece
-
Neill US. How to write a scientific masterpiece. J Clin Invest. 2007;117: 3599-3602.
-
(2007)
J Clin Invest.
, vol.117
, pp. 3599-3602
-
-
Neill, U.S.1
-
10
-
-
33847762819
-
For the SCAAR Study Group. Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden
-
Lagerqvist B, James SK, Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Nilsson T, Wallentin. L, for the SCAAR Study Group. Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2007;365: 1009-1019.
-
(2007)
N Engl J Med.
, vol.365
, pp. 1009-1019
-
-
Lagerqvist, B.1
James, S.K.2
Stenestrand, U.3
Lindback, J.4
Nilsson, T.5
Wallentin, L.6
-
11
-
-
0037081039
-
How to write an evidence-based clinical review article
-
11. Siwek J, Gourlay ML, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65: 251-258. (Pubitemid 34098229)
-
(2002)
American Family Physician
, vol.65
, Issue.2
, pp. 251-258
-
-
Siwek, J.1
Gourlay, M.L.2
Slawson, D.C.3
Shaughnessy, A.F.4
-
12
-
-
4544368518
-
The effect of vascular smooth muscle cell-targeted expression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in a murine model of arterial thrombosis
-
DOI 10.1160/TH04-01-0006
-
12. Pan S, Kleppe LS, Witt TA, Mueske CS, Simari RD. The effect of vascular smooth muscle cell-targeted expression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in a murine model of arterial thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2004;92:495-502. (Pubitemid 39248006)
-
(2004)
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
, vol.92
, Issue.3
, pp. 495-502
-
-
Pan, S.1
Kleppe, L.S.2
Witt, T.A.3
Mueske, C.S.4
Simari, R.D.5
-
16
-
-
84930562641
-
The science of scientific writing: If the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs
-
Gopen GD, Swan. JA. The science of scientific writing: if the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs. Am Scientist. 1990;78:550-558.
-
(1990)
Am Scientist.
, vol.78
, pp. 550-558
-
-
Gopen, G.D.1
Swan, J.A.2
-
17
-
-
33744953536
-
How to read, understand, and write "Discussion" sections in medical articles: An exercise in critical thinking
-
Jenicek M. How to read, understand, and write "Discussion" sections in medical articles: an exercise in critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2006; 12:SR28-SR36.
-
(2006)
Med Sci Monit.
, vol.12
-
-
Jenicek, M.1
-
18
-
-
0034612092
-
The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing
-
18. Skelten JR, Edwards SJL. The function of the discussion section, in academic medical writing. BMJ. 2000;320:1269-1270. (Pubitemid 30240483)
-
(2000)
British Medical Journal
, vol.320
, Issue.7244
, pp. 1269-1270
-
-
Skelton, J.R.1
Edwards, S.J.L.2
-
19
-
-
16644373179
-
How to write an effective discussion
-
Hess DR. How to write an effective discussion. Respir Care. 2004;49: 1238-1241.
-
(2004)
Respir Care.
, vol.49
, pp. 1238-1241
-
-
Hess, D.R.1
-
20
-
-
34047259024
-
How do i get a paper accepted?
-
DeMaria AN. How do I get a paper accepted? J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007;49:1666-1667.
-
(2007)
J Am Coll Cardiol
, vol.49
, pp. 1666-1667
-
-
Demaria, A.N.1
-
21
-
-
34247897257
-
How Do i Get a Paper Accepted?-Part 2
-
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.020, PII S0735109707012235
-
21. DeMaria AN. How do I get a paper accepted? Part 2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1989-1990. (Pubitemid 46694291)
-
(2007)
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
, vol.49
, Issue.19
, pp. 1989-1990
-
-
Demaria, A.N.1
-
22
-
-
0037372917
-
Approach to manuscript preparation and submission: How to get your paper accepted
-
Kern MJ, Bonneau HN. Approach to manuscript preparation and submission: how to get your paper accepted. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58:391-396.
-
(2003)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
, vol.58
, pp. 391-396
-
-
Kern, M.J.1
Bonneau, H.N.2
-
23
-
-
33645120721
-
Preparing manuscripts for online submission: Basic information and avoidance of common pitfalls
-
Welch AJ. Preparing manuscripts for online submission: basic information and avoidance of common pitfalls. Chest. 2006;129:822-825.
-
(2006)
Chest.
, vol.129
, pp. 822-825
-
-
Welch, A.J.1
|