Boundary configurations in science policy: Modeling practices in health care

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 108-130

  van Egmond, Stans ^a   Bal, Roland ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

boundary configurations; boundary work; economic models; health care; science advice

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649716563     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243910366131     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The system of professions. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Ashmore, Malcolm, Michael Mulkay, and Trevor Pinch. 1989. Health and efficiency. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
3. Bal, Roland. 1998. Organizing boundaries: Standard setting for occupational chemicals in the Netherlands. In The politics of chemical risk: Scenarios for a regulatory future, ed. R. Bal and W. Halffman, 75-103. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bal, Roland, Wiebe E. Bijker, and Ruud Hendriks. 2002. Paradox van wetenschappelijk gezag. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Gezondheidsraad.
5. Boer, E.J. 1986. Gezondheid Als Uitgangspunt: Nota 2000 in het kort, ed. Staatsuitgeverij. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Staatsuitgeverij, 's-Gravenhage.
6. Boumans, Marcel. 1999. Built-in justification. In Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science, ed. S. Morgan Mary and Margaret Morrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Callon, Michel. 1998. The laws of the markets (The sociological review). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
8. Cash, David, Jonathan Borck, and Anthony Patt. 2006. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31:465-94.
9. CPB. 1994. Overzicht Literatuur T.B.V. Zorgmodel, 1-20. Report 154. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
10. CPB. 1996a. Meeting notes, 12 July.
11. CPB. 1996b. Letter Concerning Ramingsmodel Zorgsector, 4. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
12. CPB. 1996c. Letter Concerning Ramingsmodel Zorgsector II, 2. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
13. CPB. 1999. Ramingsmodel Zorgsector. Eindraport tweede fase. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CPB in samenwerking met SCP.
14. CPB. 2001a. CPB Report 2001/3. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
15. CPB. 2001b. Een scenario voor de zorguitgaven 2003-2006. CPB Report 2001 /007. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
16. CPB. 2006a. Zorg in Model: algemene structuur en varianten. CPB memorandum 148. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Centraal Planbureau.
17. CPB, RIVM, and SCP. 1994. Pre-study: Naar Een Ramingsmodel Voor De Zorgsector. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CPB, RIVM, SCP.
18. CPB, SCP. 1995. Ramingsmodel Zorgsector: Organisatie en planning. Werkdocument: Den Haag.
19. CPB, and SCP. 1997. Ramingsmodel Zorgsector. Afronding eerste fase; een tussenrapportage. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CBP en SCP. Document 93.
20. CPB, and SCP. 1998a. RMZ-20. Report progress and aim of the project care model. November 26.
21. CPB, and SCP. 1998b. Voortgang en richting van het project Ramingsmodel Zorgsector.
22. Dekker. 1987. Commissie Structuur en Financiering Gezondheidszorg. Bereidheid Tot Verandering. Den Haag, The Netherlands.
23. Den Butter, Frank A.G., and Robert H. J. Mosch. 2003. The Dutch miracle: Institutions, networks, and trust. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159:362-91.
24. Duncker, Elke. 2001. Symbolic communication in multidisciplinary cooperations. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26:349-86.
25. Edwards, Paul N. 1999. Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture 8:437-72.
26. Evans, Robert. 1999. Economic models and policy advice: Theory choice or moral choice? Science in Context 12:351-76.
27. Evans, R. 2000. Economic models and economic policy: What economic forecasters can do for government. In Empirical models and policy-making: Interaction and institutions, ed. F. A. G. Den Butter and M. S. Morgan. London and New York: Routledge.
28. Galison, Peter. 1996. Computer simulations and the trading zone. In The disunity of science. Boundaries, contexts, and power, ed. Peter Galison and David J. Stump, 118-57. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Garcia-Parpet, Marie-France. 2007. The social construction of a perfect market: The Strawberry Auction at Fontaines-En-Sologne. In Do economists make markets? ed. Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Sui. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Gieryn, Thomas, F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48:781-95.
31. Gieryn, Thomas, F. 1995. Boundaries of science. In Handbook of social sciences, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 393-443. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32. Halffman, Willem, and Rob Hoppe. 2005. Science/policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making, ed. Sabine Maasen and Peter Weingart, 135-51. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
33. Halffman, W. 2003. Boundaries of regulatory science, eco/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands, 1970-1995. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
34. Harrison, Steven, and Christopher Pollitt. 1994. Controlling health professionals: The future of work and organization in the National Health Service. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
35. Helderman, Jan-Kees, Frederik T. Schut, Tom Van der Grinten, and Wynand Van de Ven. 2005. Market-oriented health care reforms and policy learning in the Netherlands. Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 30:189-209.
36. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Kickert, Walter. 2000. Public management reforms in The Netherlands. Social reconstruction of reform ideas and underlying frames of reference. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
38. Kraemer, Kenneth L., Siegfried Dickhoven, Susan Fallows Tierney, and John Leslie King. 1987. Datawars: The politics of modeling in federal policymaking. In Corps (Computing, organizations, policy, and society), ed. Kenneth L. Kraemer and Rob Kling. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. MacKenzie, Donald, and Yuval Millo. 2003. Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial exchange. American Journal of Sociology 109:107-45.
40. Miller, Clark. 2001. Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26:478-500.
41. Morgan, Mary, S., and Margaret Morrison, eds. 1999. Models as mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. NRV. 1987. Kanttekeningen Bij De Nota 2000. Zoetermeer: Nationale Raad voor de Volksgezondheid.
43. Pesch, Udo. 1999. Het Centraal Planbureau en de Sjablonen van het Economisch Beleid. Master Thesis.
44. Rivm. 2002. Gezondheid Op Koers? Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning 2002, 1-293. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM.
45. Sabatier, Paul, A. 1999. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CA: Westview Press.
46. Scholten, G.R.M., A.J.M. Roex, and J.W. Sindram. 1998. Cost-control and medical specialist payment: The Dutch alternative. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 13:69-82.
47. SCP. 1994. Letter concerning care-model. October 14.
48. Sismondo, Sergio. 1999. Models, simulations, and their objects. Science in Context 12:247-60.
49. Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19:387-420.
50. Trommel, Willem. 2003. Zekere verbanden? Over de onderzoeksmethode van het SCP. Beleid & Maatschappij 30:42-5.
51. Van den Bogaard, Adrienne. 1999. Configuring the economy. Amsterdam: Thelathesis.
52. Van den Bogaard, Adrienne. 2002. De verwevenheid tussen toekomstverkenningen en beleid. Den Haag, The Netherlands: WRR.
53. Van der Zee, J. 1996. Letter Concerning Ramingsmodel Zorgsector. 2. Utrecht: NIVEL.
54. van Egmond, Stans, Marleen Bekker, Roland Bal, and Tom van der Grinten. 2007. De VTV Als Infrastructuur Voor Evidence-Based Gezondheidsbeleid. TSG- Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen 85:399-409.
55. VWS. 1994. Letter Concerning Toekomstverkenning Volume En Kosten Van De Gezondheidszorg, 2. Rijswijk: Ministerie WVC.
56. Weingart, Peter. 1999. Scientific expertise and political accountability: Paradoxes of science in politics. Science and Public Policy 26:151-62.
57. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction.
58. Wittrock, B. 1991. Social knowledge and public policy: Eight models of interaction. In Social sciences and modern states. National experiences and theoretical crossroads, ed. P. Wagner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Woodhouse, E.J., and S.E. Cozzens. 1995. Science, government and the politics of knowledge. In Handbook of science and technology studies, revised edition, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 533-53. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60. Wynne, B. 1992. Carving out science (and politics) from the regulatory jungle. Social Studies of Science 22:745-58.