메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1955-1962

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: An Analysis of Outcomes in 17,199 Patients Using ACS/NSQIP

Author keywords

Appendectomy; Complications; Laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649693906     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1300-1     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (40)

References (19)
  • 1
    • 0002079293 scopus 로고
    • The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating
    • McBurney C. IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Annals of Surgery 1894; 20(1): 38.
    • (1894) Annals of Surgery , vol.20 , Issue.1 , pp. 38
    • McBurney IV, C.1
  • 6
    • 18744421369 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    • Khuri S, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Annals of Surgery 1998; 228(4): 491.
    • (1998) Annals of Surgery , vol.228 , Issue.4 , pp. 491
    • Khuri, S.1    Daley, J.2    Henderson, W.3
  • 7
    • 18544391076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility
    • Fink A, Campbell Jr D, Mentzer Jr R, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Annals of Surgery 2002; 236(3): 344.
    • (2002) Annals of Surgery , vol.236 , Issue.3 , pp. 344
    • Fink, A.1    Campbell Jr., D.2    Mentzer Jr., R.3
  • 8
    • 0034535230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system1
    • Biondo S, Ramos E, Deiros M, et al. Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system1. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2000; 191(6): 635-642.
    • (2000) Journal of the American College of Surgeons , vol.191 , Issue.6 , pp. 635-642
    • Biondo, S.1    Ramos, E.2    Deiros, M.3
  • 9
    • 70349912174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy
    • Tabatabai A, Hashemi M, Mohajeri G, et al. Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy. Annals of Thoracic Medicine 2009; 4(4): 197.
    • (2009) Annals of Thoracic Medicine , vol.4 , Issue.4 , pp. 197
    • Tabatabai, A.1    Hashemi, M.2    Mohajeri, G.3
  • 10
    • 0033869099 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn's disease
    • Yamamoto T, Allan R, Keighley M. Risk factors for intra-abdominal sepsis after surgery in Crohn's disease. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2000; 43(8): 1141-1145.
    • (2000) Diseases of the Colon & Rectum , vol.43 , Issue.8 , pp. 1141-1145
    • Yamamoto, T.1    Allan, R.2    Keighley, M.3
  • 11
    • 77649178914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery
    • Esteban Varela J, Wilson S, Nguyen N. Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 2010: 24 (2): 270-276.
    • (2010) Surgical Endoscopy , vol.24 , Issue.2 , pp. 270-276
    • Esteban Varela, J.1    Wilson, S.2    Nguyen, N.3
  • 12
    • 0025953534 scopus 로고
    • Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index
    • Culver D, Horan T, Gaynes R, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. The American Journal of Medicine 1991; 91(3): S152-S157.
    • (1991) The American Journal of Medicine , vol.91 , Issue.3
    • Culver, D.1    Horan, T.2    Gaynes, R.3
  • 13
    • 42149137282 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks
    • Brill A, Ghosh K, Gunnarsson C, et al. The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks. Surgical Endoscopy 2008; 22(4): 1112-1118.
    • (2008) Surgical Endoscopy , vol.22 , Issue.4 , pp. 1112-1118
    • Brill, A.1    Ghosh, K.2    Gunnarsson, C.3
  • 14
    • 27644460458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study
    • Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surgical Endoscopy 2005; 19(9): 1193-1195.
    • (2005) Surgical Endoscopy , vol.19 , Issue.9 , pp. 1193-1195
    • Olmi, S.1    Magnone, S.2    Bertolini, A.3    Croce, E.4
  • 15
    • 24944457361 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study
    • discussion 448-50
    • Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005; 242(3): 439-48; discussion 448-50.
    • (2005) Ann Surg , vol.242 , Issue.3 , pp. 439-448
    • Katkhouda, N.1    Mason, R.J.2    Towfigh, S.3
  • 16
    • 0030741210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes
    • Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, et al. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Archives of Surgery 1997; 132(7): 708.
    • (1997) Archives of Surgery , vol.132 , Issue.7 , pp. 708
    • Minne, L.1    Varner, D.2    Burnell, A.3
  • 17
    • 1542346404 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial
    • Ignacio R, Burke R, Spencer D, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18(2): 334-337.
    • (2004) Surgical Endoscopy , vol.18 , Issue.2 , pp. 334-337
    • Ignacio, R.1    Burke, R.2    Spencer, D.3
  • 18
    • 15944425083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis
    • Moberg A, Berndsen F, Palmquist I, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. British Journal of Surgery 2005; 92(3): 298-304.
    • (2005) British Journal of Surgery , vol.92 , Issue.3 , pp. 298-304
    • Moberg, A.1    Berndsen, F.2    Palmquist, I.3
  • 19
    • 34548076550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy
    • Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2007; 17(4): 245.
    • (2007) Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques , vol.17 , Issue.4 , pp. 245
    • Bennett, J.1    Boddy, A.2    Rhodes, M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.