Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MRI at end-systole: Feasibility study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 195, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1088-1094

  Matsumoto, Hidenari ^a   Matsuda, Tetsuya ^b   Miyamoto, Kenichi ^a   Shimada, Toshihiko ^a   Hayashi, Atsushi ^a   Mikuri, Mikiko ^a   Hiraoka, Yuji ^a  

^a RAKUWAKAI OTOWA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Atrial fibrillation; End systole; Late gadolinium enhancement; MRI; Myocardial infarction

Indexed keywords

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ARTICLE; DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE INFARCTION; HEART RATE AND RHYTHM; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINUS RHYTHM; SYSTOLE;

AGED; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIASTOLE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SYSTOLE;

EID: 78649691088     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3860     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100:1992-2002
2. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1445-1453
3. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003; 361:374-379
4. Kim RJ, Albert TS, Wible JH, et al. Gadoversetamide Myocardial Infarction Imaging Investigators. Performance of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging with gadoversetamide contrast for the detection and assessment of myocardial infarction: an international, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial. Circulation 2008; 117:629-637
5. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001; 218: 215-223 (Pubitemid 32151298)
6. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5:505-514 [Erratum in J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 613-615]
7. Luisada AA, MacCanon DM. The phases of the cardiac cycle. Am Heart J 1972; 83:705-711
8. Boudoulas H, Rittgers SE, Lewis RP, Leier CV, Weissler AM. Changes in diastolic time with various pharmacologic agents: implication for myocardial perfusion. Circulation 1979; 60:164-169 (Pubitemid 9209640)
9. Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO, et al. Heartrate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector- row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2670-2678
10. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238:75-86 (Pubitemid 43010582)
11. Arevalo F, Sakamoto T. On the duration of the isovolumetric relaxation period (IVRP) in dog and man. Am Heart J 1964; 67:651-656
12. Sievers B, Rehwald WG, Albert TS, et al. Respiratory motion and cardiac arrhythmia effects on diagnostic accuracy of myocardial delayed-enhanced MR imaging in canines. Radiology 2008; 247:106-114
13. Strub WM, Vagal A, Meyer C. Optimizing coronary artery imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. AJR 2007; 189:150; [web]W50-W51
14. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007; 245:703-711 (Pubitemid 350127340)
15. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241:378-385
16. European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology. Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21:1502-1513
17. Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, et al. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:18
18. Kitagawa K, Sakuma H, Nagata M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:2808-2816
19. Scheffler K, Henning JT. Quantification with inversion recovery TrueFISP. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45:720-723
20. Sievers B, Elliott MD, Hurwitz LM, et al. Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by subsecond, free-breathing delayed contrast-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2007; 115:236-244
21. Heiberg E, Engblom H, Engvall J, Hedström E, Ugander M, Arheden H. Semi-automatic quantification of myocardial infarction from delayed contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Scand Cardiovasc J 2005; 39:267-275
22. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105:539-542
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
24. Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N, et al. Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:250-256 (Pubitemid 32436605)
25. Knollmann FD, Mäurer J, Wlodarczyk W, Böck JC, Felix R. Fourier phase mapping of the human heart: the use of spatial modulation of magnetization cine magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1996; 31:743-748
26. Matsuda T, Yamada H, Kida M, Sasayama S. Is 300 msec too long for cardiac imaging? Feasibility study showing changes in left ventricular cross-sectional area with use of single shot turbo-FLASH imaging. Radiology 1994; 190:353-362
27. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:372-383
28. Huber A, Schoenberg SO, Spannagl B, et al. Single-shot inversion recovery TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction. AJR 2006; 186:627-633
29. Lee DC, Wu E, Chung Y, et al. Comparison between single shot true FISP and segmented turbo-FLASH for the detection of myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5:79-80
30. Matsumoto H, Kondo T, Watanabe S, et al. ECG-edited middiastolic phase reconstruction improves image quality at 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation. AJR 2008; 191:1659-1666
31. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Holly TA, et al. Reproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002; 106:2322-2327
32. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Thomson L, et al. Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:2027-2033