Real-time control of two-stage sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of animal wastewater

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 343-356

  Ra, C S ^a   Lo, K V ^a   Mavinic, D S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal slurry; Oxidation reduction potential (ORP); Real time control; Residual carbon manipulation point (RCMP); Two stage sequencing batch reactor (TSSBR)

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BATCH REACTORS; CARBON; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; REAL TIME CONTROL; REDOX REACTIONS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANIMAL SLURRY; ANIMAL WASTEWATERS; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; REAL-TIME CONTROL STRATEGY; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; RESIDUAL CARBON; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR SYSTEMS; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

AMMONIA; CARBON; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROL SYSTEM; DENITRIFICATION; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PH; PRODUCTIVITY; SWINE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0031977194     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593331908616690     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Robertson, A. M., Farm Wastes Handbook: problems, properties, storage, handling and use of by-products from housing farm livestock. Aberdeen; Scottish farm building investigation units, (1977).
2. Peddie, C. C., Mavinic, D. S. and Jenkins, C. J., Use of ORP for monitoring and control of aerobic sludge digestion. J. Environ. Engin., ASCE, 116,461, (1990).
3. Wareham, D. G., Hall, K. J. and Mavinic, D. S., Real-time control of aerobic-anoxic sludge digestion using ORP. J. Environ. Engin., ASCE, 119,120, (1993).
4. Yu, R. F., Chang, C. N., Lu, H. J. and Cheng, W. Y., Monitoring and control using on-line ORP on the continuous-flow activated sludge batch reactor system Water Sci. Technol., 35,57, (1997).
5. American Public Health Association (A.P.H.A), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th Ed., Washington, D. C., (1995).
6. Hao, O. J. and Huang, J., Alternating aerobic-anoxic process for nitrogen removal: process evaluation. Water Environ. Res., 68, 83, (1996).
7. Metcalf and Eddy., Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. 3rd Edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, pp 133(1991).
8. Benefield L.D., and Randall C. W., Evaluation of a comprehensive kinetic model for the activated sludge process. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 49,1636, (1977).
9. Daigger G. T. and Grady J., Factors affecting effluent quality from fill-and-draw activated sludge reactors. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 49,2390, (1977).
10. Bortone G., Gemelli S., Rambaldi A. and Tilche A. Nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphate removal in sequencing batch reactors treating piggery wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 26,977-985 (1992).
11. Lo, K.V, Liao, P.H. and Van Kleeck, R.J. A full-scale sequencing batch reactor treatment of diluted swine wastewater. Canad. Agric. Engin. 33,193-195 (1990).
12. Ng, W.J., Aerobic treatment of piggery wastewater with the sequencing batch reactor. Biol. Wastes 22, 285-294. (1987).