Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: Is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK)

Clinical Research in Cardiology

Volumn 99, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 809-815

  Zahn, Ralf ^a   Ischinger, Thomas ^b   Zeymer, Uwe ^a   Brachmann, Johannes ^c   Jung, Jens ^d   Haase, Hartwig ^e   Hauptmann, Karl Eugen ^f   Seggewi, Hubert ^g   Janicke, Ilse ^h   Leschke, Matthias ⁱ   Mudra, Harald ^b  

^a KLINIKUM LUDWIGSHAFEN   (Germany)

^b Institut für Pathologie   (Germany)

^c KLINIKUM COBURG   (Germany)

^d Klinikum Worms   (Germany)

^e Herz Jesu Krankenhaus   (Germany)

^f KRANKENHAUS DER BARMHERZIGEN BRÜDER   (Germany)

^g Klinikum Schweinfurt   (Germany)

^h Kardiologie   (Germany)

ⁱ KLINIKUM ESSLINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery stenting; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

CLOPIDOGREL; TICLOPIDINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DE NOVO STENOSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RESTENOSIS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CAROTID STENOSIS; CORONARY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; RECURRENCE; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649679967     PISSN: 18610684     EISSN: 18610692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-010-0188-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. LH Bonati J Ederle DJ McCabe J Dobson RL Featherstone PA Gaines JD Beard GS Venables HS Markus A Clifton P Sandercock MM Brown 2009 Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial Lancet Neurol 8 908 917 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70227-3 19717347
2. T Brott HP Adams Jr CP Olinger JR Marler WG Barsan J Biller J Spilker R Holleran R Eberle V Hertzberg 1989 Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale Stroke 20 864 870 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzhvVequg%3D%3D 2749846 (Pubitemid 19188240)
3. RE Carballo JB Towne GR Seabrook JA Freischlag RA Cambria 1996 An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis J Vasc Surg 23 749 753 1:STN:280:DyaK283isFCjsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70236-7 8667495 (Pubitemid 26159160)
4. DJ Clark S Lessio M O'Donoghue C Tsalamandris R Schainfeld K Rosenfield 2006 Mechanisms and predictors of carotid artery stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2390 2396 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.076 16781364 (Pubitemid 43866374)
5. T Cumbie EB Rosero RJ Valentine JG Modrall GP Clagett CH Timaran 2008 Utility and accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in evaluating in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting Am J Surg 196 623 628 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.008 18954596
6. MB Das NR Hertzer NB Ratliff PJ O'Hara EG Beven 1985 Recurrent carotid stenosis. A five-year series of 65 reoperations Ann Surg 202 28 35 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3ltVKntQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00004 4015210
7. HH Eckstein P Ringleb JR Allenberg J Berger G Fraedrich W Hacke M Hennerici R Stingele J Fiehler H Zeumer O Jansen 2008 Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial Lancet Neurol 7 893 902 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70196-0 18774746
8. K Groschel A Riecker JB Schulz U Ernemann A Kastrup 2005 Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting Stroke 36 367 373 10.1161/01.STR.0000152357.82843.9f 15625299 (Pubitemid 40170824)
9. HS Gurm JS Yadav P Fayad BT Katzen GJ Mishkel TK Bajwa G Ansel NE Strickman H Wang SA Cohen JM Massaro DE Cutlip 2008 Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 358 1572 1579 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXksF2gsLo%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa0708028 18403765 (Pubitemid 351519817)
10. JC Jimenez WS Moore PF Lawrence WJ Quinones-Baldrich 2008 Technical strategies for recurrent carotid stenosis following angioplasty and stenting Ann Vasc Surg 22 179 184 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.08.002 18023558 (Pubitemid 351381307)
11. A Kastrati A Schomig S Elezi H Schuhlen J Dirschinger M Hadamitzky A Wehinger J Hausleiter H Walter FJ Neumann 1997 Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement J Am Coll Cardiol 30 1428 1436 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fis1Ohsw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00334-3 9362398 (Pubitemid 27486458)
12. BN King LA Scher EC Lipsitz 2009 Refractory in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting: a case report and review of operative management Vasc Endovascular Surg 43 306 311 10.1177/1538574408327572 19131368
13. BK Lal RW Hobson B Tofighi I Kapadia S Cuadra Z Jamil 2008 Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery J Vasc Surg 47 63 73 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038 18178455
14. EI Levy RA Hanel T Lau CJ Koebbe N Levy DJ Padalino KM Malicki LR Guterman LN Hopkins 2005 Frequency and management of recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stent implantation J Neurosurg 102 29 37 15658093
15. JL Mas L Trinquart D Leys JF Albucher H Rousseau A Viguier JP Bossavy B Denis P Piquet P Garnier F Viader E Touze P Julia M Giroud D Krause H Hosseini JP Becquemin G Hinzelin E Houdart H Henon JP Neau S Bracard Y Onnient R Padovani G Chatellier 2008 Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial Lancet Neurol 7 885 892 10.1016/S1474-4422(08) 70195-9 18774745
16. N Mercado E Boersma W Wijns BJ Gersh CA Morillo V de Valk GA van Es DE Grobbee PW Serruys 2001 Clinical and quantitative coronary angiographic predictors of coronary restenosis: a comparative analysis from the balloon-to-stent era J Am Coll Cardiol 38 645 652 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MvosFyhtg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01431-0 11527611 (Pubitemid 32835730)
17. WS Moore RF Kempczinski JJ Nelson JF Toole 1998 Recurrent carotid stenosis : results of the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study Stroke 29 2018 2025 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvivFKnuw%3D%3D 9756575
18. PJ Nederkoorn MM Brown 2009 Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study BMC Neurol 9 36 10.1186/1471-2377-9-36 19624830
19. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators 1991 Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators N Engl J Med 325 445 453 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701
20. B Park F Aiello M Dahn JO Menzoian A Mavanur 2006 Follow-up results of carotid angioplasty with stenting as assessed by duplex ultrasound surveillance Am J Surg 192 583 588 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.025 17071188 (Pubitemid 44634353)
21. Reimers B, Tubler T, de DG, Della BM, Cernetti C, Schluter M, Mistrorigo F, Sacca S, Favero L, Setacci F, Setacci C, Thiene G, Schofer J, Angelini A. (2006) Endovascular treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: immediate and midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 13:429-435
22. GS Roubin G New SS Iyer JJ Vitek N Al Mubarak MW Liu J Yadav C Gomez RE Kuntz 2001 Immediate and Late Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis : A 5-Year Prospective Analysis Circulation 103 532 537 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3is1aqtw%3D%3D 11157718
23. CL Skelly K Gallagher RM Fairman JP Carpenter OC Velazquez SS Parmer EY Woo 2006 Risk factors for restenosis after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting J Vasc Surg 44 1010 1015 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.039 17098535 (Pubitemid 46107249)
24. SF Stanziale MH Wholey TN Boules F Selzer MS Makaroun 2005 Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria J Endovasc Ther 12 346 353 10.1583/04-1527.1 15943510 (Pubitemid 40828042)
25. W Theiss P Hermanek K Mathias H Bruckmann J Dembski FJ Hoffmann R Kerner F Leisch H Mudra KL Schulte H Sievert 2008 Predictors of death and stroke after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a subgroup analysis of the Pro-CAS data Stroke 39 2325 2330 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.514356 18583556
26. MH Wholey N Al Mubarek MH Wholey 2003 Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60 259 266 10.1002/ccd.10645 14517936 (Pubitemid 37204008)
27. R Zahn B Mark N Niedermaier U Zeymer P Limbourg T Ischinger K Haerten KE Hauptmann ER Leitner W Kasper U Tebbe J Senges 2004 Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur Heart J 25 1550 1558 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.018 15342175 (Pubitemid 39165634)
28. R Zahn E Roth T Ischinger B Mark M Hochadel U Zeymer K Haerten KE Hauptmann ER von Leitner A Schramm W Kasper J Senges 2005 Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice Results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK) Z Kardiol 94 163 172 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mtlyitA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00392-005-0195-4 15747038 (Pubitemid 40394898)
29. W Zhou DD Felkai M Evans SA McCoy PH Lin P Kougias HF El-Sayed AB Lumsden 2008 Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting J Vasc Surg 47 74 80 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.031 18178456
30. W Zhou PH Lin RL Bush EK Peden MA Guerrero P Kougias AB Lumsden 2006 Management of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients J Vasc Surg 43 305 312 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040 16476606 (Pubitemid 43221925)