Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 74-80

  Zhou, Wei ^a   Felkai, Deborah D ^c   Evans, Mark ^c   McCoy, Sally A ^c   Lin, Peter H ^b,c   Kougias, Panagiotos ^b,c   El Sayed, Hosam F ^b,c   Lumsden, Alan B ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASOUND;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 37549032542     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bettmann M.A., Katzen B.T., Whisnant J., Brant-Zawadzki M., Broderick J.P., Furlan A.J., et al. Carotid stenting and angioplasty: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardiovascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9 1 Pt 1 (1998) 3-5
2. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet 357 9270 (2001) 1729-1737
3. Yadav J.S. Carotid stenting in high-risk patients: design and rationale of the SAPPHIRE trial. Cleve Clin J Med 71 Suppl 1 (2004) S45-S46
4. Yadav J.S., Wholey M.H., Kuntz R.E., Fayad P., Katzen B.T., Mishkel G.J., et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1493-1501
5. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., Geohagan M., Chakhtoura E., Pappas P.J., et al. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg 38 (2003) 1162-1168 discussion 1169
6. Setacci C., Pula G., Baldi I., de Donato G., Setacci F., Cappelli A., et al. Determinants of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty: a case-control study. J Endovasc Ther 10 (2003) 1031-1038
7. Chakhtoura E.Y., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., Simonian G.T., Lal B.K., Haser P.B., et al. In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: incidence and management. J Vasc Surg 33 (2001) 220-225 discussion 225-6
8. Willfort-Ehringer A., Ahmadi R., Gschwandtner M.E., Haumer M., Lang W., and Minar E. Single-center experience with carotid stent restenosis. J Endovasc Ther 9 (2002) 299-307
9. Zhou W., Lin P.H., Bush R.L., Peden E.K., Guerrero M.A., Kougias P., et al. Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 43 (2006) 305-312
10. Levy E.I., Hanel R.A., Lau T., Koebbe C.J., Levy N., Padalino D.J., et al. Frequency and management of recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stent implantation. J Neurosurg 102 (2005) 29-37
11. Setacci C., de Donato G., Setacci F., Pieraccini M., Cappelli A., Trovato R.A., et al. In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a challenge for the vascular surgeon. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29 (2005) 601-607
12. Ringer A.J., German J.W., Guterman L.R., and Hopkins L.N. Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound. Neurosurgery 51 (2002) 639-643 discussion 643
13. Robbin M.L., Lockhart M.E., Weber T.M., Vitek J.J., Smith J.K., Yadav J., et al. Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology 205 (1997) 749-756
14. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., Chakhtoura E.Y., and Duran W.N. Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 58-66
15. Fleming S.E., Bluth E.I., and Milburn J. Role of sonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stents. J Clin Ultrasound 33 (2005) 321-328
16. Stanziale S.F., Wholey M.H., Boules T.N., Selzer F., and Makaroun M.S. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 346-353
17. Lin P.H., Bush R.L., Peden E.K., Zhou W., Guerrero M., Henao E.A., et al. Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. Am J Surg 190 (2005) 850-857
18. Stradness D.E. Duplex scanning in vascular disorders (1990), Raven Press, New York
19. Peterson B.G., Longo G.M., Kibbe M.R., Matsumura J.S., Blackburn D., Astleford P., et al. Duplex ultrasound remains a reliable test even after carotid stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 19 (2005) 793-797