Style and content of CT and MR imaging lumbar spine reports: Radiologist and clinician preferences

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1842-1847

  Ghali Eskander, M ^a   Leung, Andrew ^a   Lee, D ^a  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGIST;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; NEUROLOGY; NEURORADIOGRAPHY; NEUROSURGERY; PHYSICIANS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78649670033     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2218     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kushner DC, Lucey LL, for the American College of Radiology. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline. Am Coll Radiol 2005;2:15-21
2. Hall FM. The radiology report of the future. Radiology 2009;251:313-16
3. Burns KEA, Duffett M, Kho ME, et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008;179:245-51
4. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:567-79
5. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:557-68
6. Cascade PN, Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology: American College of Radiology standard for communication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1439-42
7. Morioka CA, Siha U, Taira R. Structured reporting in neuroradiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;980:259-66
8. Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:591-98 (Pubitemid 32181947)
9. Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH. Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 2009;64:386-94
10. Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective. Br J Radiol 2010;83:17-22
11. Sistrom CL, Honeyman-Buck J. Free text versus structured format: information transfer efficiency of radiology reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:804-12
12. McLoughlin RF, So CB, Gray RR, et al. Radiology reports: how much descriptive detail is enough? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:803-06
13. Lafortune M, Breton G, Baudouin JL. The radiological report: what is useful for the referring physician? J Can Assoc Radiol 1988;39:140-43