Developing consumer-directed care for people with a disability: 10 lessons for user participation in health and community care policy and program development

Australian Health Review

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 390-394

  Ottmann, Goetz F ^a   Laragy, Carmel ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649669279     PISSN: 01565788     EISSN: 14498944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AH09759     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Department of Health. Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services (White Paper). Norwich, UK: Older People and Disabilities Division, Department of Health; 2006.
2. Administration on Ageing Choices for Independence: Modernizing the Older Americans Act. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Ageing; 2006.
3. Real Voices,Real Choices: the qualitiespeople expect from care services. Newcastle, UK: Commission for Social Care Inspection; 2006.
4. Braye S. Participation and involvement in social care. In Kemshall H, Littlechild R, editors. User Involvement and Participation in Social Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2000.
5. Church J, Church J, Saunders D, Wanke M, Pong R, Spooner C, Dorgan M. Citizen participation in health decision-making: past experience and future prospects.J Public Health Policy2002; 23(1):12-32. doi:10.2307/3343116
6. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin F-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57: 239-51. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X (Pubitemid 36582667)
7. Kosciulek JF. Implications of consumer direction for disability policy development and rehabilitation service delivery. J Disabil Policy Stud 2000; 11(2): 82-9. doi:10.1177/104420730001100204
8. Kemshall H, Littlechild R. User Involvement and Participation in Social Care. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2000.
9. Parent W. Quality of life and consumer choice. In Wehman P, editor. The ADA mandate for social change. Baltimore: Brookes; 1993.
10. National Council on Disability. Achieving independence. J Disabil Policy Stud 1996; 7(2): 57-65. doi:10.1177/104420739600700204
11. Rowe R, Shepherd M. Public participation in the new NHS: no closer to citizen control? Soc Policy Adm 2002; 36(3): 275-90. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00251
12. Baggott R. A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHSin England. Public Adm2005; 83(3): 533-51. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00461.x (Pubitemid 41702208)
13. Ottmann G, Laragy C, Damonze G. Consumer participation in designing community based consumer-directed disability care: lessons from a participatory action research-inspired project. Syst Pract Action Res 2009; 22(1): 31-44. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9110-z
14. Ottmann G, Laragy C, Haddon M. Experiences of disability consumer-directed care users in Australia: results from a longitudinal qualitative study. Health Soc Care Community 2009; doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524. 2009.00851.x
15. Butler C, Rissel C, Kharvarpour F. The context for community participation in health action in Australia. Aust J Soc Issues 1999; 34(3): 253-65.
16. Milewa T. Local participatory democracy in Britain's Health Service: innovation or fragmentation of a universal citizenship? Soc Policy Adm 2004; 38(3): 240-52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00388.x (Pubitemid 38629716)
17. Milewa T, Dowswell G, Harrison S. Partnerships, power and the 'new' politicsofcommunity participationinBritish health care.Soc Policy Adm 2002; 36(7): 796-809. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00318
18. Morone JA, Kilbreth EH. Power to the people? Restoring citizen participation. J Health Polit Policy Law 2003; 28(2-3): 271-88. doi:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-271 (Pubitemid 36712772)
19. Simmons R, Powell M, Greener I. The consumer in public service: Choice, values and difference. Bristol: Policy Press; 2009.
20. Diamond P. Public Matters: The renewal of the public realm. London: Politico's Publishing; 2007.
21. Glendinning C, Kemp PA. Cash and Care: Policy challenges in the welfare state. Bristol: Policy Press; 2006.
22. Glendinning C, Challis D, Fernandez J-L, Jacobs S, Jones K, Knapp M, et al. Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Program. Final Report. London: Social Policy Research Unit, Personal Social Services Research Unit, Social Care Workforce Research Unit; 2008.
23. Simon-Rusinowitz L, Mahoney KJ, Marks LN, Zacharias BL, Loughlin DM. The cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation: focus group inform design of a consumer directed cash option. Care Manag J 2005; 6(2): 56-65. doi:10.1891/cmaj.6.2.56 (Pubitemid 43246038)
24. Tilly J. Recent research on consumer-directed home care in the Netherlands, England, Germany and the United States, outcomes. Australas J Ageing 2005; 24: S59. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2005. 00091.x
25. Ungerson C. Whose empowerment and independence? A cross-national perspective on 'cash for care' schemes. Ageing Soc 2004; 24: 189-212. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001508
26. Kendrick M. The natural authority of families. Crucial Times 1996; 6 (July). Available at http://www.socialrolevalorization.com/articles/kendrick/ natural-authority-of-families.pdf [accessed 4 October].
27. Kendrick M, Family-Governed Flexible Family Support: The Massachusetts Small Project Example. Working paper sponsored by Massachusetts Families Organizing for Change and Uniting Families for Change of Western Massachusetts. 2001. Available at http://www.kendrickconsulting.org/pubreg.asp?pid=22&ptype [accessed 4 October 2010].
28. Ottmann G, Street AF. Ten lessons for developing a health information website. Aust Health Rev 2007; 31(4): 523-6. doi:10.1071/AH070523
29. Shaw SE. Driving out alternative ways of seeing: the significance of neo-liberal policy mechanisms for UK primary care research. Soc Theory Health 2007; 5(4): 316-37. doi:10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700102
30. Chung K, Lounsbury DW. The role of power, process, and relationships in participatory research for statewide HIV/AIDS programming. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63(8): 2129-40. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.035 (Pubitemid 44278359)