Change-based inference in attractor nets: Linear analysis

Neural Computation

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3036-3061

  Moazzezi, Reza ^a,b   Dayan, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; LETTER; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS;

EID: 78649661885     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00051     Document Type: Letter

References (33)

1. Brody, C. D., Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., & Romo, R. (2003). Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 1196-1207.
2. Camperi, M., & Wang, X-J. (1997). Modeling delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory tasks. In J. Bower (Ed.), Computational neuroscience: Trends in research (pp. 273-279). New York: Plenum Press.
3. Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. (1994). Summation and division by neurons in visual cortex. Science, 264, 1333-1336.
4. Carandini, M., Heeger, D., & Movshon, J. A. (1997). Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neuroscience, 17, 8621-8644.
5. Compte, A., Brunel, N., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Wang, X-J. (2000). Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 910-923.
6. Deneve, S., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (1999). Reading population codes: A neural implementation of ideal observers. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 740-745.
7. Deneve, S., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2001). Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 826-831.
8. Dosher, B., & Lu, Z. L. (1999). Mechanisms of perceptual learning. Vision Research, 39, 3197-3221.
9. Douglas, R., Martin, K., & Whitteridge, D. (1989). A canonical microcircuit for neocortex. Neural Computation, 1, 480-488.
10. Fahle, M. (1994). Human pattern recognition: Parallel processing and perceptual learning. Perception, 23, 411-427.
11. Fahle, M., Edelman, S., & Poggio, T. (1995). Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity. Vision Research, 35, 3003-3013.
12. Ganguli, S., Bisley, J. W., Roitman, J. D., Shadlen, M. N., Goldberg, M. E., & Miller, K. D. (2008). One-dimensional dynamics of attention and decision making in LIP. Neuron, 58, 15-25.
13. Heeger, D. J., Simoncelli, E. P., & Movshon, J. A. (1996). Computational models of cortical visual processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 623-627.
14. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79, 2554-2558.
15. Hung, C., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T., & DiCarlo, J. (2005). Fast read-out of object information in inferior temporal cortex. Science, 310, 863-866.
16. Li, Z., & Dayan, P. (2001). Position variance, recurrence and perceptual learning. In T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich, & V. Tresp (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 13 (pp. 31-37). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Mareschal, I., Dakin, S. C., & Bex, P. J. (2006). Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 5131-5136.
18. Mazor, O., & Laurent, G. (2005). Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron, 48, 661-673.
19. Moazzezi, R., & Dayan, P. (2008). Change-based inference for invariant discrimination. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 19, 236-252.
20. Nienborg, H., & Cumming, B. (2009). Decision-related activity in sensory neurons reflects more than a neuron's causal effect. Nature, 459, 89-92.
21. Pouget, A., Zhang, K., Deneve, S., & Latham, P. E. (1998). Statistically efficient estimation using population code. Neural Computation, 10, 373-401.
22. Reinagel, P. (2001). How do visual neurons respond in the real world? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 437-442.
23. Renart, A., Song, P., & Wang, X-J. (2003). Robust spatial working memory through homeostatic synaptic scaling in heterogeneous cortical networks. Neuron, 38, 473-485.
24. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
25. Seung, H. S. (1996). How the brain keeps the eyes still. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13339-13344.
26. Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science, 287, 1273-1276.
27. Wang, X-J. (2001). Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 455-463.
28. Wong, K-F., Huk, A. C., Shadlen, M. N., & Wang, X-J. (2007). Neural circuit dynamics underlying accumulation of time-varying evidence during perceptual decision making. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 1, 1-11.
29. Wu, S., & Amari, S. (2005). Computing with continuous attractors: Stability and online aspects. Neural Computation, 17, 2215-2239.
30. Wu, S., Nakahara, H., & Amari, S. (2001). Population coding with correlation and an unfaithful model. Neural Computation, 13, 775-797.
31. Yang, Y., DeWeese, M. R., Otazu, G. H., & Zador, A. M. (2008). Millisecond-scale differences in neural activity in auditory cortex can drive decisions. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1262-1263.
32. Zhang, K. (1996). Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: A theory. J. Neuroscience, 16, 2112-2126.
33. Zhaoping, L., Herzog, M. H., & Dayan, P. (2003). Quadratic ideal observation and recurrent preprocessing in perceptual learning. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 233-247.