Decision making in head and neck cancer care

Laryngoscope

Volumn 120, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2434-2445

  Davies, Louise ^a,b,c   Rhodes, Lorna A ^e   Grossman, David C ^d,f   Rosenberg, Marie Claire ^c   Stevens, David P ^c  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^f U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; Head and neck neoplasm; physician patient communication; qualitative research; quality of care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER PAIN; CANCER SURVIVAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OFFICE VISITS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TRUST;

EID: 78649653621     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Henschke UK, Flehinger BJ,. Decision theory in cancer therapy. Cancer 1967; 20: 1819-1826.
2. McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG,. Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1981; 305: 982-987.
3. Fast stats: an interactive tool for access to SEER cancer statistics. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute. Available at:. Accessed April 14, 2010.
4. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1685-1690.
5. Charbonneau N, Gelinas M, del Vecchio P, et al. Primary radiotherapy for tonsillar carcinoma: a good alternative to a surgical approach. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35: 227-234.
6. Poulsen M, Porceddu SV, Kingsley PA, Tripcony L, Coman W,. Locally advanced tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma: treatment approach revisited. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 45-50. (Pubitemid 46066061)
7. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
8. Holmes-Rovner M, Nelson WL, Pignone M, et al. Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium. Med Decis Making 2007; 27: 599-608.
9. O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health screening or treatment decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8: CD001431.
10. O'Connor AM, Drake ER, Fiset V, Graham ID, Laupacis A, Tugwell P,. The Ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract 1999; 2: 163-170.
11. Glaser B, Strauss, A,. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.
12. Creswell JW,. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
13. Strauss AL, Corbin JM,. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
14. Bernard RH,. Research Methods in Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press; 2002.
15. Merton RK, Fiske M, Kendall PL,. The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems and Procedures. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1956.
16. Ruland CM, Bakken S,. Developing, implementing, and evaluating decision support systems for shared decision making in patient care: a conceptual model and case illustration. J Biomed Inform 2002; 35: 313-321.
17. Lewin S, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J,. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001: CD003267.
18. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A,. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ 1999; 319: 780-782.
19. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 5-22.
20. Towle A, Godolphin W,. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ 1999; 319: 766-771.
21. Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J,. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA 2000; 284: 1021-1027.
22. Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R,. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA 1997; 277: 678-682.
23. O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB,. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; suppl web exclusives: VAR63-VAR72.
24. Whelan TM, O'Brien MA, Villasis-Keever M, et al. Impact of Cancer-Related Decision Aids. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 46. AHRQ Publication No. 02-E004. Rockville, MD: McMaster University Contract No. 290-97-0017, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
25. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Urowitz S, Sharpe N,. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations. Health Expect 2007; 10: 248-258.
26. Thompson AG,. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 1297-1310.
27. Deber RB,. Shared decision making in the real world. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 377-378.
28. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J,. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 1414-1420.
29. Sanders T, Skevington S,. Do bowel cancer patients participate in treatment decision-making? Findings from a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2003; 12: 166-175.