Improving medical work experience for students

Clinical Teacher

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 284-287

  Hunter, Neil ^a   Shah, Alexander ^a   Bollina, Prasad ^a   Bollina, Harsha ^b  

^a NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; CAREER CHOICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; STATE MEDICINE; STUDENTS;

EID: 78649649696     PISSN: 17434971     EISSN: 1743498X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Parry J, Mathers JM, Stevens A, Parsons A, Lilford R, Spurgeon P, Thomas H. Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: a review BMJ 2006;332:1005-1009.
2. Council of Heads of Medical Schools (2006). Guiding principles for the admission of medical students. London: Council of Heads of Medical School.
3. McManus IC. Drop-out rate in medical schools seems reasonable. BMJ 1996;313:173.
4. Royal Commission on Medical Education 1965-68 (1968) Report. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
5. BMA Medical Student's Conference (2010) York:
6. Admissions to Higher Education Steering Group (2004). Fair admissions to higher education: recommendations for good practice. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills Publications.
7. NHS Lothian human resources. Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 2007.
8. Parkhouse J. Intake, output anddrop-out in United Kingdom medical schools. BMJ 1996;312:885.