Low-intensity ultrasound stimulation prevents osteoporotic bone loss in young adult ovariectomized mice

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 116-125

  Lim, Dohyung ^a   Ko, Chang Yong ^b   Seo, Dong Hyun ^b   Woo, Dae Gon ^b,d   Kim, Jin Man ^c   Chun, Keyoung Jin ^a   Kim, Han Sung ^b  

^a Korea Institute of Industrial Technology   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^c Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

^d National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

in vivo micro computed tomography; longitudinal study; low intensity ultrasound stimulation; osteoporotic bone loss prevention; structural characteristics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE ATROPHY; BONE FRAGILITY; BONE MASS; BONE STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; IN VIVO STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; OVARIECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; FEMALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED ICR; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; OVARIECTOMY; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 78649568753     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21191     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Warden SJ, Bennell KL, Forwood MR, et al. 2001. Skeletal effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on the ovariectomized rodent. Ultrasound Med Biol 27: 989-998.
2. van der Jagt OP, van der Linden JC, Schaden W, et al. 2009. Unfocused extracorporeal shock wave therapy as potential treatment for osteoporosis. J Orthop Res 27: 1528-1533.
3. Monici M, Bernabeib PA, Basilec V, et al. 2007. Can ultrasound counteract bone loss? Effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation on a model of osteoclastic precursor. Acta Astronautica 60: 383.
4. Rubin C, Sommerfeldt D, Judex S, et al. 2001. Inhibition of osteopenia by low magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli. Drug Discov Today 6: 848-858.
5. Perry MJ, Parry LK, Burton VJ, et al. 2009. Ultrasound mimics the effect of mechanical loading on bone formation in vivo on rat ulnae. Med Eng Phys 31: 42.
6. Rubin C, Bolander M, Ryaby JP, et al. 2001. The use of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83: 259-270.
7. Pilla AA, Mont MA, Nasser PR, et al. 1990. Non-invasive low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. J Orthop Trauma 4: 246-253.
8. Wang SJ, Lewallen DG, Bolander ME, et al. 1994. Low intensity ultrasound treatment increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model. J Orthop Res 12: 40-47.
9. Azuma Y., 2001. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res 16: 671.
10. Duarte LR., 1983. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 101: 153-159.
11. Takikawa S, Matsui N, Kokubu T, et al. 2001. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound initiates bone healing in rat nonunion fracture model. J Ultrasound Med 20: 197-205.
12. Malizos KN, Hantes ME, Protopappas V, Papachristos A., 2006. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: an overview. Injury 37 (Suppl 1): S56-S62.
13. Shimazaki A, Inui K, Azuma Y, et al. 2000. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone maturation in distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82: 1077.
14. Eberson C., 2003. Effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation on consolidation of the regenerate zone in a rat model of distraction osteogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop 23: 46.
15. Tsumaki N, Kakiuchi M, Sasaki J, et al. 2004. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates maturation of callus in patients treated with opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy by hemicallotasis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 2399-2405.
16. Kokubu T, Matsui N, Fujioka H, et al. 1999. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound exposure increases prostaglandin E2 production via the induction of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in mouse osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 256: 284.
17. Li JK, Chang WH, Lin JC, et al. 2003. Cytokine release from osteoblasts in response to ultrasound stimulation. Biomaterials 24: 2379.
18. Naruse K, Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Azuma Y, et al. 2000. Anabolic response of mouse bone-marrow-derived stromal cell clone ST2 cells to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 268: 216.
19. Unsworth J, Kaneez S, Harris S, et al. 2007. Pulsed low intensity ultrasound enhances mineralisation in preosteoblast cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 33: 1468.
20. Yang RS, Lin WL, Chen YZ, et al. 2005. Regulation by ultrasound treatment on the integrin expression and differentiation of osteoblasts. Bone 36: 276.
21. Warden SJ., 2001. Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the prevention of osteoporosis following spinal cord injury. Bone 29: 431.
22. Carvalho DCL, Cliquet A Jr., 2004. The action of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in bones of osteopenic rats. Artif Organs 28: 114-118.
23. David V, Laroche N, Boudignon B, et al. 2003. Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of bone architecture alterations in hindlimb-unloaded female rats using novel three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 18: 1622-1631.
24. Waarsing J, Day J, van der Linden J, et al. 2004. Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone 34: 163-169.
25. Warden SJ, Bennell KL, McMeeken JM, et al. 2000. A technique for restraining rodents during hindlimb interventions. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 39: 24-27.
26. Cowin S., 2000. Bone mechanics handbook. Boca Raton: CRC press.
27. Chen YJ, Wang CJ, Yang KD, et al. 2003. Pertussis toxin-sensitive Galphai protein and ERK-dependent pathways mediate ultrasound promotion of osteogenic transcription in human osteoblasts. FEBS Lett 554: 154-158.
28. Malizos KN, Papachristos AA, Protopappas VC, et al. 2006. Transosseous application of low-intensity ultrasound for the enhancement and monitoring of fracture healing process in a sheep osteotomy model. Bone 38: 530.
29. Sample SJ, Behan M, Smith L, et al. 2008. Functional adaptation to loading of a single bone is neuronally regulated and involves multiple bones. J Bone Miner Res 23: 1372-1381.
30. Wolpert L., 1989. Positional information revisited. Development 107 (Suppl): 3-12.
31. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, et al. 2000. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405: 704-706.
32. Henderson JH, Carter DR., 2002. Mechanical induction in limb morphogenesis: the role of growth-generated strains and pressures. Bone 31: 645-653.
33. Skerry TM., 2008. The response of bone to mechanical loading and disuse: fundamental principles and influences on osteoblast/osteocyte homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys 473: 117-123.
34. Tatsumi S, Ishii K, Amizuka N, et al. 2007. Targeted ablation of osteocytes induces osteoporosis with defective mechanotransduction. Cell Metab 5: 464-475.
35. Tomkinson A, Reeve J, Shaw RW, et al. 1997. The death of osteocytes via apoptosis accompanies estrogen withdrawal in human bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 3128-3135.