Estimation of radiation exposure of prospectively triggered 128-slice computed tomography coronary angiography

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 182, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1105-1109

  Ketelsen, D ^a   Buchgeister, M ^a   Fenchel, M ^a   Thomas, C ^a   Boehringer, N ^a   Tsiflikas, I ^a   Kaempf, M ^a   Syha, R ^a   Claussen, C D ^a   Heuschmid, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alderson Rando phantom; effective dose; prospectively triggered CTCA; step and shoot

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION MEASUREMENT;

BODY BURDEN; BREAST; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUNG; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TESTIS; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY; THYROID GLAND; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78649501954     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245812     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I et al. Dual-Source CT: Effect of Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability, and Calcification on Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy. Radiology 2008 247 346-355
2. Maurer M H., Hamm B, Dewey M. Umfrage zur klinischen Anwendung der CT des Herzens in Deutschland: Indikationen, Durchführung und Befundung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 1135-1143
3. Lotz J, Kivelitz D, Fischbach R et al. Empfehlungen für den Einsatz der Computertomografie und Magnetresonanztomografie in der Herzdiagnostik. Teil 2 Magnetresonanztomografie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 800-814
4. Fischbach R, Miller S, Beer M et al. Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Herzdiagnostik der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft für denEinsatz der Computertomografie und Magnetresonanztomografie in der Herzdiagnostik. Teil 1 Computertomografie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 700-706
5. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008 94 1132-1137
6. Brenner D J., Hall E J. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007 357 2277-2284
7. Heyer C M., Peters S, Lemburg S. Die Struktur des Deutschen Röntgenkongresses und die wissenschaftliche Behandlung der Themen Strahlendosis und Dosisreduktion: eine Analyse der Jahre 1998 2008. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 1065-1072
8. Ketelsen D, Thomas C, Werner M et al. Dual-source computed tomography: Estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 2010 73 274-279
9. Kuettner A, Gehann B, Spolnik J et al. Strategien der Dosisoptimierung in der pädiatrischen Dual-Source-Kardio-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 339-348
10. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008 249 71-80
11. Anders K, Baum U, Gauss S et al. Erste Erfahrungen mit der sequenziellen, prospektiv getriggerten CT-Koronarangiografie an einem 128-Schicht- Computertomografen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 332-338
12. Ketelsen D, Luetkhoff M H., Thomas C et al. Estimation of the radiation exposure of a chest pain protocol with ECG-gating in dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2009 19 37-41
13. Hunold P, Vogt F M., Schmermund A et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 2003 226 145-152
14. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007 37 1-132
15. Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender W A. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 2008 18 1188-1198
16. Hermann F, Martinoff S, Meyer T et al. Reduction of radiation dose estimates in cardiac 64-slice CT angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Invest Radiol 2008 43 253-260
17. Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C et al. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: a phantom study. Am J Roentgenol 2008 190 315-320
18. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008 29 531-556
19. Klass O, Walker M, Siebach A et al. Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2010 20 1124-1131
20. Einstein A J., Henzlova M J., Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007 298 317-323
21. Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K et al. Energy imparted-based estimates of the effect of z overscanning on adult and pediatric patient effective doses from multi-slice computed tomography. Med Phys 2007 34 1139-1152
22. Kalra M K., Maher M M., Toth T L. et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004 230 619-628
23. Stolzmann P, Donati O F., Scheffel H et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography for the prediction of myocardial ischaemia. Eur Radiol 2010 20 56-64
24. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008 18 592-599
25. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid F T. et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008 18 1809-1817
26. Boetticher H, Lachmund J, Looe H K. et al. Die Empfehlungen der ICRP von 2007 ändern die Berechnungsgrundlagen für die effektive Dosis: WelcheBedeutung hat dies für die Abschätzung der Strahlendosis von Patienten und Personal? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008 180 391-395