Low-dose CT coronary angiography for the prediction of myocardial ischaemia

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 56-64

  Stolzmann, Paul ^a   Donati, Olivio F ^a   Scheffel, Hans ^a   Azemaj, Naim ^a   Baumueller, Stephan ^a   Plass, André ^a   Kozerke, Sebastian ^b   Leschka, Sebastian ^a   Grünenfelder, Jürg ^a   Boesiger, Peter ^b   Marincek, Borut ^a   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Low dose; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial ischaemia; Myocardial perfusion imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GATED IMAGING; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BODY BURDEN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PERFUSION IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 76949084425     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1536-x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J Schwitter CM Wacker AC van Rossum, et al. 2008 MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial Eur Heart J 29 480 489 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617 18208849 (Pubitemid 351264187)
2. H Sakuma N Suzawa Y Ichikawa, et al. 2005 Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 95 102 15972407
3. A Wagner H Mahrholdt TA Holly, et al. 2003 Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study Lancet 361 374 379 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12389-6 12573373 (Pubitemid 36164969)
4. 201Tl SPECT imaging Radiology 232 49 57 10.1148/radiol.2321031127 15166320 (Pubitemid 38787819)
5. R Hachamovitch DS Berman LJ Shaw, et al. 1998 Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction Circulation 97 535 543 1:STN:280: DyaK1c7ltlSnsA%3D%3D 9494023
6. RJ Kim E Wu A Rafael, et al. 2000 The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction N Engl J Med 343 1445 1453 10.1056/NEJM200011163432003 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FisFWnsw%3D%3D 11078769 (Pubitemid 30832880)
7. V Bodi J Sanchis MP Lopez-Lereu, et al. 2007 Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 50 1174 1179 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.016 17868810 (Pubitemid 47375015)
8. S Leschka H Alkadhi A Plass, et al. 2005 Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience Eur Heart J 26 1482 1487 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261 15840624 (Pubitemid 41378989)
9. NR Mollet F Cademartiri CA van Mieghem, et al. 2005 High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography Circulation 112 2318 2323 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471 16203914 (Pubitemid 41464575)
10. U Ropers D Ropers T Pflederer, et al. 2007 Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 50 2393 2398 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.017 18154964 (Pubitemid 50011578)
11. H Scheffel H Alkadhi A Plass, et al. 2006 Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control Eur Radiol 16 2739 2747 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0 17031451 (Pubitemid 44823927)
12. S Leschka P Stolzmann FT Schmid, et al. 2008 Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose Eur Radiol 18 1809 1817 10.1007/s00330-008-0966-1 18392829
13. P Stolzmann H Scheffel T Schertler, et al. 2008 Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography Eur Radiol 18 592 599 10.1007/s00330-007-0786-8 17909816 (Pubitemid 351248188)
14. J Hsieh J Londt M Vass, et al. 2006 Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography Med Phys 33 4236 4248 10.1118/1.2361078 17153402 (Pubitemid 44673113)
15. JP Earls EL Berman BA Urban, et al. 2008 Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose Radiology 246 742 753 10.1148/radiol.2463070989 18195386
16. H Alkadhi 2009 Radiation dose of cardiac CT-what is the evidence? Eur Radiol 19 1311 1315 10.1007/s00330-009-1312-y 19190911
17. H Scheffel H Alkadhi S Leschka, et al. 2008 Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance Heart 94 1132 1137 10.1136/hrt.2008.149971 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crhvVersA%3D%3D 18519548
18. O Gaemperli T Schepis I Valenta, et al. 2008 Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT Radiology 248 414 423 10.1148/radiol.2482071307 18552310
19. GA Diamond JS Forrester 1979 Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease N Engl J Med 300 1350 1358 1:STN:280:DyaE1M7nvVCrtg%3D%3D 440357
20. WG Austen JE Edwards RL Frye, et al. 1975 A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association Circulation 51 5 40 1:STN:280:DyaE2M7htFersg%3D%3D 1116248
21. MD Cerqueira NJ Weissman V Dilsizian, et al. 2002 Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18 539 542 12135124
22. S Plein S Ryf J Schwitter, et al. 2007 Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k-t sense Magn Reson Med 58 777 785 10.1002/mrm.21381 17899611 (Pubitemid 47556883)
23. R Gebker C Jahnke I Paetsch, et al. 2007 MR myocardial perfusion imaging with k-space and time broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique: feasibility study Radiology 245 863 871 10.1148/radiol.2453061701 18024455 (Pubitemid 350127358)
24. S Plein J Schwitter D Suerder, et al. 2008 k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T Radiology 249 493 500 10.1148/radiol.2492080017 18936311
25. I Klem JF Heitner DJ Shah, et al. 2006 Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 47 1630 1638 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.074 16631001
26. M Hacker T Jakobs F Matthiesen, et al. 2005 Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences J Nucl Med 46 1294 1300 16085585
27. CW White CB Wright DB Doty, et al. 1984 Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 310 819 824 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7kt1WgsA%3D%3D 6700670
28. WB Meijboom CA Van Mieghem N van Pelt, et al. 2008 Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina J Am Coll Cardiol 52 636 643 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.024 18702967
29. JD Schuijf W Wijns JW Jukema, et al. 2006 Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2508 2514 10.1016/j.jacc.2006. 05.080 17174190 (Pubitemid 44881213)
30. WF Armstrong WA Zoghbi 2005 Stress echocardiography: current methodology and clinical applications J Am Coll Cardiol 45 1739 1747 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12. 078 15936598 (Pubitemid 40779849)
31. O Gaemperli T Schepis P Koepfli, et al. 2007 Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34 1162 1171 10.1007/s00259-006-0307-z 17219136 (Pubitemid 47290655)
32. JM Miller M Dewey AL Vavere, et al. 2009 Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64 Eur Radiol 19 816 828 10.1007/s00330-008-1203-7 18998142
33. M Gilard G Le Gal JC Cornily, et al. 2007 Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study Arch Intern Med 167 1686 1689 10.1001/archinte.167.15.1686 17698693 (Pubitemid 47280351)
34. G Pundziute JD Schuijf JW Jukema, et al. 2007 Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 49 62 70 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.070 17207724 (Pubitemid 46026899)
35. AJ Einstein KW Moser RC Thompson, et al. 2007 Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging Circulation 116 1290 1305 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688101 17846343 (Pubitemid 47517541)
36. E Kuon DM Robinson K Empen, et al. 2005 [Fluoroscopy time-an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology] Rofo 177 812 817 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3mtFKntw%3D%3D 15902630
37. J Hausleiter T Meyer M Hadamitzky, et al. 2006 Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates Circulation 113 1305 1310 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490 16520411 (Pubitemid 43739452)
38. Plein S, Kozerke S, Suerder D et al (2008) High spatial resolution myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn297
39. R Gebker C Jahnke I Paetsch, et al. 2008 Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion MR at 3 T in patients with coronary artery disease Radiology 247 57 63 10.1148/radiol.2471070596 18305188
40. C Jahnke E Nagel R Gebker, et al. 2007 Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging Circulation 115 1769 1776 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106. 652016 17353441 (Pubitemid 46648614)
41. C Klein R Gebker T Kokocinski, et al. 2008 Combined magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging, myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients with suspected coronary artery disease J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10 45 10.1186/1532-429X-10-45 18928521
42. S Leschka S Wildermuth T Boehm, et al. 2006 Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality Radiology 241 378 385 10.1148/radiol.2412051384 16966483 (Pubitemid 44632882)