Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory

Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 348-372

  Fridman, Natalie ^a   Kaminka, Gal A ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cognitive modeling; Model of social comparison theory; Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMIC FRAMEWORK; COGNITIVE MODEL; COGNITIVE THEORY; CROWD BEHAVIOR; PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOR; PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT; SOCIAL COMPARISON THEORY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 78649501190     PISSN: 1381298X     EISSN: 15729346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10588-010-9082-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allport FH (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
2. Balch T (1998) Behavioral diversity in learning robot teams. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
3. Berk R (1974) A gaming approach to crowd behavior. Am Sociol Rev.
4. Blue VJ, Adler JL (2000) Cellular automata microsimulation of bidirectional pedestrian flows. Trans Res Rec 135-141.
5. Blumer HG (1939) Collective behavior. Princ Sociol.
6. Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. CASA.
7. Braun A, Musse SR, de Oliveira LPL, Bodmann BEJ (2003) Modeling individual behaviors in crowd simulation. In: Computer animation and social agents, pp 143-148.
8. Carley K, Newell A (1994) The nature of the social agent. J Math Sociol.
9. Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP (2003) Experimental research of pedestrian walking behavior. Transp Res Rec 20-30.
10. Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relat 117-140.
11. Fridman N (2007) Modeling crowd behavior based on social comparison theory. Master's thesis, Bar Ilan University.
12. Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2009) Comparing human and synthetic group behaviors: A model based on social psychology. In: International conference on cognitive modeling ICCM-09).
13. Fridman N, Kaminka GA (2011) Towards a computational model of social comparison: Some implications for the cognitive architecture. Cogn Systems Res.
14. Goethals GR, Darley JM (1977) Social comparison theory: an attributional approach. In: Social comparison processes: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Hemisphere, Washington, DC.
15. Goethals GR, Klein WMP (2000) Interpreting and inventing social reality: attributional and constructive elements in social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York.
16. Helbing D (1993) Boltzmann-like and Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck equations as a foundation of behavioral models. Physica A 196: 546-573.
17. Helbing D (2001) Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev Mod Phys 73.
18. Helbing D, Farkas IJ, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407: 487-490.
19. Helbing D, Molnar P (1997) Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds. In: Schweitzer F (ed) Self-organization of complex structures: from individual to collective dynamics. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 569-577.
20. Helbing D, Molnar P, Farkas IJ, Bolay K (2001) Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B 28: 361-384.
21. Henderson LF (1971) The statistics of crowd fluids. Nature 229: 381-383.
22. Henderson LF (1974) On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motion. Transp Res 8: 505-515.
23. Hornstein HA, Fisch E, Holmes M (1968) Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol.
24. Kretz T (2007) Pedestrian traffic: simulation and experiments. PhD thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
25. Le Bon G (1895) The crowd: a study of the popular mind. Dunwoody, Ga., N. S. Berg, 1968 edition.
26. Milgram S, Bickman L, Berkowitz L (1969) Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. J Pers Soc Psychol 13(2): 79-82.
27. Newell A (1990) Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
28. Pelechano N, Allbeck JM, Badler NI (2008) Virtual crowds: methods, simulation, and control. Morgan and Claypool.
29. Pelechano N, Stocker C, Allbeck J, Badler N (2008) Being a part of the crowd: towards validating vr crowds using presence. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS).
30. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH-87). ACM Press, New York, pp 25-34.
31. Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behavior for autonomous character. In: Proceedings of the game developers conference, pp 763-782.
32. Rymill SJ, Dodgson NA (2005) A psychologically-based simulation of human behaviour. In: Theory and practice of computer graphics, pp 35-42.
33. Smith WP, Arnkelsson GB (2000) Stability of related attributes and the inference of ability through social comparison. In: Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. Plenum, New York.
34. Thalmann D (2001) The foundations to build a virtual human society. In: Proceedings of intelligent virtual actors (IVA-2001). Springer, Berlin, pp 1-14.
35. Tissera PC, Printista M, Errecalde ML (2007) Evacuation simulations using cellular automata. J Comput Sci Technol.
36. Toyama MC, Bazzan ALC, da Silva R (2006) An agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics: from lane formation to auditorium evacuation. In: Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS).
37. Tu X, Terzopoulos D (1994) Artificial fishes: physics, locomotion, perception, behavior. In: SIGGRAPH '94': proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press, New York, pp 43-50.
38. Turner R, Killian LM (1972) Collective Behavior, 1993 edition. Prentice Hall, New York.
39. Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling-Northwestern University; http://ccl. northwestern. edu/netlogo/.
40. Wolff M (1973) Notes on the behaviour of pedestrians. In: People in places: the sociology of the familiar, pp 35-48.