Cell morphological response to low shear stress in a two-dimensional culture microsystem with magnitudes comparable to interstitial shear stress

Biorheology

Volumn 47, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 165-178

  Park, Joong Yull ^a,b   Yoo, Sung Ju ^a,c   Patel, Lalit ^b,d   Lee, Soon Hyuck ^e   Lee, Sang Hoon ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c Dankook University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

fibroblast; interstitial flow; Mechanosensitivity; mesenchymal stem cell; shear stress

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLAST; FLOW RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSMOTIC PUMP; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRESS;

ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78649501012     PISSN: 0006355X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2010-0567     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. E.H. Burger and J. Klein-Nulend, Microgravity and bone cell mechanosensitivity, Bone 22 (1998), 127S-130S.
2. E.H. Burger and J. Klein-Nulend, Mechanotransduction in bone-role of the lacuno-canalicular network, FASEB J. 13 (Suppl.) (1999), S101-S112.
3. G. Cinamon, V. Shinder and R. Alon, Shear forces promote lymphocyte migration across vascular endothelium bearing apical chemokines, Nat. Immunol. 2 (2001), 515-522.
4. A. Cucina, A.V. Sterpetti, G. Pupelis et al., Shear stress induces changes in the morphology and cytoskeleton organisation of arterial endothelial cells, Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 9 (1995), 86-92.
5. O.C. Farokhzad, A. Khademhosseini, S.Y. Yon et al., Microfluidic system for studying nanoparticles and microparticles the interaction of with cells, Anal. Chem. 77 (2005), 5453-5459.
6. C. Fehrer and G. Lepperdinger, Mesenchymal stem cell aging, Exp. Gerontol. 40 (2005), 926-930.
7. M.E. Fleury, K.C. Boardman and M.A. Swartz, Autologous morphogen gradients by subtle interstitial flow and matrix interactions, Biophys. J. 91 (2006), 113-121.
8. E.Y. Fok and P.W. Zandstra, Shear-controlled single-step mouse embryonic stem cell expansion and embryoid body-based differentiation, Stem Cells 23 (2005), 1333-1342.
9. C.L.E. Helm, M.E. Fleury, A.H. Zisch et al., Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005), 15779-15784.
10. H. Huang, F. Cruz and G. Bazzoni, Junctional adhesion molecule-A regulates cell migration and resistance to shear stress, J. Cell. Physiol. 209 (2006), 122-130.
11. C.T. Hung, F.D. Allen, S.R. Pollack et al., Intracellular calcium response of ACL and MCL ligament fibroblasts to fluidinduced shear stress, Cell. Signal. 9 (1997), 587-594.
12. D.E. Ingber, Mechanosensation through integrins: Cells act locally but think globally, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003), 1472-1474.
13. T. Kadohama, K. Nishimura, Y. Hoshino et al., Effects of different types of fluid shear stress on endothelial cell proliferation and survival, J. Cell. Physiol. 212 (2007), 244-251.
14. A.G. Karakecili, T.T. Demirtas, C. Satriano et al., Evaluation of L929 fibroblast attachment and proliferation on Arg-Gly- Asp-Ser (RGDS)-immobilized chitosan in serum-containing/serum-free cultures, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 104 (2007), 69-77.
15. L. Kim, M.D. Vahey, H.Y. Lee and J. Voldman, Microfluidic arrays for logarithmically perfused embryonic stem cell culture, Lab Chip 6 (2006), 394-406.
16. J. Klein-Nulend, R.G. Bacabac and M.G. Mullender, Mechanobiology of bone tissue, Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 53 (2005), 576-580.
17. J. Klein-Nulend, R.G. Bacabac, J.P. Veldhuijzen and J.J. Van Loon, Microgravity and bone cell mechanosensitivity, Adv. Space Res. 32 (2003), 1551-1559.
18. D.A. Lauffenburger and A.F. Horwitz, Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process, Cell 84 (1996), 359-369.
19. H. Lu, L.Y. Koo, W.C.M. Wang et al., Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion, Anal. Chem. 76 (2004), 5257-5264.
20. J.R. Mackley, J. Ando, P. Herzyk and S.J. Winder, Phenotypic responses to mechanical stress in fibroblasts from tendon, cornea and skin, Biochem. J. 396 (2006), 307-316.
21. C.P. Ng, B. Hinz and M.A. Swartz, Interstitial fluid flow induces myofibroblast differentiation and collagen alignment in vitro, J. Cell Sci. 118 (2005), 4731-4739.
22. C.P. Ng and M.A. Swartz, Fibroblast alignment under interstitial fluid flow using a novel 3-D tissue culture model, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 284 (2003), H1771-H1777.
23. C.P. Ng and M.A. Swartz, Mechanisms of interstitial flow-induced remodeling of fibroblast-collagen cultures, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34 (2006), 446-454.
24. F.Q. Nie, M. Yamada, J. Kobayashi et al., On-chip cell migration assay using microfluidic channels, Biomaterials 28 (2007), 4017-4022.
25. J.Y. Park, C.M. Hwang, S.H. Lee and S.H. Lee, Gradient generation by an osmotic pump and the behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells under the fetal bovine serum concentration gradient, Lab Chip 7 (2007), 1673-1680.
26. J.Y. Park, S.K. Kim, D.H. Woo et al., Differentiation of neural progenitor cells in a microfluidic chip-generated cytokine gradient, Stem Cells 27 (2009), 2646-2654.
27. J.A. Pedersen, F. Boschetti and M.A. Swartz, Effects of extracellular fiber architecture on cell membrane shear stress in a 3D fibrous matrix, J. Biomech. 40 (2007), 1484-1492.
28. M.F. Pittenger, A.M. Mackay, S.C. Beck et al., Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells, Science 284 (1999), 143-147.
29. G.V. Rosland, A. Svendsen, A. Torsvik et al., Long-term cultures of bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells frequently undergo spontaneous malignant transformation, Cancer Res. 69 (2009), 5331-5339.
30. J.M. Rutkowski and M.A. Swartz, A driving force for change: Interstitial flow as a morphoregulator, Trends Cell Biol. 17 (2007), 44-50.
31. J.P. Stegemann, H. Hong and R.M. Nerem, Mechanical, biochemical, and extracellular matrix effects on vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype, J. Appl. Physiol. 98 (2005), 2321-2327.
32. M.A. Swartz and M.E. Fleury, Interstitial flow and its effects in soft tissues, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 (2007), 229-256.
33. J.M. Tarbell, S. Weinbaum and R.D. Kamm, Cellular fluid mechanics and mechanotransduction, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33 (2005), 1719-1723.
34. M.M. Thi, J.M. Tarbell, S. Weinbaum and D.C. Spray, The role of the glycocalyx in reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton under fluid shear stress: A "bumper-car" model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004), 16483-16488.
35. L. van der Pol and J. Tramper, Shear sensitivity of animal cells from a culture-medium perspective, Trends Biotechnol. 16 (1998), 323-328.
36. S. Yedgar, N. Reisfeldgranot and B.A. Sela, Regulation of liver-cell ganglioside composition by extracellular fluid viscosity, Lipids 21 (1986), 629-633.