Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2974-2979

  Killeen, Tim ^a   Banerjee, Saswata ^a   Vijay, Vardhini ^a   Al Dabbagh, Zaid ^a   Francis, Daren ^a   Warren, Steve ^a  

^a CHASE FARM HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIMETRY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 78649449780     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1075-1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. C Laurent F Leblanc P Wütrich M Scheffler E Rullier 2009 Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results Ann Surg 250 1 54 61 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6511 19561481
2. C Anderson G Uman A Pigazzi 2008 Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature Eur J Surg Oncol 34 1135 1142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crptF2jsg%3D%3D 18191529
3. J Gu X Bo C Xiong A Wu X Zhang M Li Q An J Fang J Li X Zhang H Wang F Gao W You 2006 Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis Dis Colon Rectum 49 10 1517 1526 10.1007/s10350-006-0665-4 17001440 (Pubitemid 44796120)
4. T Akiyoshi H Kuroyanagi M Oya T Konishi M Fukuda Y Fujimoto M Ueno S Miyata T Yamaguchi 2009 Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer Surgery 146 3 483 489 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.030 19715805
5. E Targarona C Balague J Pernas C Martinez R Berindoague I Gich M Trias 2008 Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy Ann Surg 247 4 642 649 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c6a 18362627 (Pubitemid 351440615)
6. A Veenhof A Engel D van der Peet M Sietses E de Lange-de Klerk M Cuesta 2008 Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 23 5 469 475 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7ovFaitw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00384-007-0433-5 18185936
7. K Boyle D Petty A Chalmers P Quirke A Cairns P Finan P Sagar D Burke 2005 MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer Colorectal Dis 7 232 240 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3isFansg%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00819.x 15859960 (Pubitemid 40637422)
8. R Verschueren N Mulder A van Loon A de Ruiter B Szabo 1997 The anatomical substrate for a difference in surgical approach to rectal cancer in male and female patients Anticancer Res 17 1B 637 641 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3hvFaqsQ%3D%3D 9066593
9. G Salerno I Daniels G Brown R Heald B Moran 2006 Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females Colorectal Dis 8 9 772 776 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28ngtVOksA%3D%3D 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01090.x 17032323 (Pubitemid 44541706)
10. G Salerno I Daniels G Brown A Norman B Moran R Heald 2007 Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (GRM) involvement in rectal cancer World J Surg 31 6 1313 1320 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szgtlOrsA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00268-007-9007-5 17468974 (Pubitemid 47029909)
11. S Hong I Chang B Han J Yu J Han S Jeong H Jeong S Byun H Lee S Lee 2007 Impact of variations in bony pelvic dimensions on performing radical retropubic prostatectomy Urology 69 5 907 911 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.045 17482932 (Pubitemid 46670229)
12. S Baik N Kim K Lee S Sohn C Cho M Kim H Kim R Shinn 2008 Factors influencing pathologic results after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: analysis of consecutive 100 cases Ann Surg Oncol 15 3 721 728 10.1245/s10434-007-9706-z 18058183
13. PP Tekis AJ Senagore CP Delaney VW Fazio 2005 Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections Ann Surg 242 83 91 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68 (Pubitemid 40917971)