Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1313-1320

  Salerno, G ^a   Daniels, I R ^a   Brown, G ^b   Norman, A R ^b   Moran, B J ^a   Heald, R J ^a  

^a NORTH HAMPSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIMETRY; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RECTUM CANCER; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RECTUM; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34447097198     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9007-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, et al. (1985) Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:947-950
2. Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ, et al. (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry before and after a periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:552-556
3. Buhre LM, Mulder NH, de Ruiter AJ, et al. (1994) Effect of extent of anterior resection and sex on disease-free survival and local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 81:1227-1229
4. Tague RG (1989) Variation in pelvic size between males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol 80:59-71
5. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996-999
6. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, et al. (1999) Rectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211:215-222
7. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, et al. (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90:355-364
8. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718-1726
9. Brown G, Daniels IR (2005) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:58-74
10. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, et al. (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210-216
11. Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Hermans J, et al. (2000) Pathology data in the central databases of multicenter randomized trials need to be based on pathology reports and controlled by trained quality managers. J Clin Oncol 18:1771-1779
12. Croxford MSG, Watson M, Heald R, et al. (2004) Colorectal 23-28. Br J Surg 91:63-65
13. McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl E, et al. (1985) Local recurrence after potentially curative resection for rectal cancer in a series of 1008 patients. Br J Surg 72:34-37
14. Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, et al. (2005) MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7:232-240
15. Boyle KM FP, Sagar PM, Burke D (2004) The relationship between mesorectal morphology and gender in patients with primary rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Surg 30:1020
16. Boyle KMPD, Chalmers AG, Quirke P, et al. (2004) The relationship between pelvic morphology and involvement of the circumferential resection margin in surgery for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 6:12
17. Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, et al. (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89:327-334
18. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, et al. (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93-96
19. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350-357
20. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, et al. (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257-9264
21. Brown G (2004) Local radiological staging of rectal cancer. Clin Radiol 59:213-214