Will global change improve grazing quality of grasslands? A call for a deeper understanding of the effects of shifts from C4 to C3 grasses for large herbivores

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1857-1861

  Chamaillé Jammes, Simon ^a   Bond, William J ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; C3 PLANT; C4 PLANT; CARBON DIOXIDE; GLOBAL CHANGE; GRASSLAND; GRAZING; HERBIVORE; MAMMAL; MIOCENE; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;

MAMMALIA; POACEAE;

EID: 78649433638     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19070.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barbehenn R. V. et al. 2004. C3 grasses have higher nutritional quality than C4 grasses under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biol. 10: 1565-1575.
2. Bond W. J. 2008. What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39: 641-659.
3. Caswell H. 1973. Photosynthetic pathways and selective herbivory: a hypothesis. Am. Nat. 107: 465-481.
4. Cerling T. E. et al. 1997. Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Nature 389: 153-157.
5. Cerling T. E. et al. 1998. Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems, and mammalian evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 159-171.
6. Collatz G. J. et al. 1998. Effects of climate and atmospheric partial pressure on the global distribution of C4 grasses: present, past and future. Oecologia 114: 441-454.
7. Cotrufo M.F. et al. 1998. Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Global. Change Biol. 4: 43-54.
8. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization). 2007. Nutrient requirements of domestic ruminants. - CSIRO Publishing.
9. Easterling D. R. et al. 2000. Climate extremes: observations, modelling and impacts. Science 289: 2068-2074.
10. Edwards E. J. and Still C. J. 2008. Climate, phylogeny and the ecological distribution of C4 grasses. Ecol. Lett. 11: 266-276.
11. Ehleringer J. R. and Monson R. K. 1993. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 411-439.
12. Ehleringer J. R. et al. 1997. C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2 and climate. Oecologia 112: 285-299.
13. Ehleringer J. R. et al. 2002. Atmospheric CO2 as a global change driver influencing plant-animal interactions. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42: 424-430.
14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 1982. Breeding plans for ruminant livestock in the tropics. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 34. <>.
15. Freer M. et al. 1997. GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises - II: The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the Graz-Feed DSS. Agric. Syst. 54: 77-126.
16. Freer M. et al. 2008. The GRAZPLAN animal biology model for sheep and cattle and the GrazFeed decision support tool. CSIRO Plant Industry Technical Paper. <> / Accessed May 2009.
17. Heckathorne S. A. et al. 1999. C4 plants and herbivory. - In: Sage R. F. and Monson R. K. (eds), C4 plant biology. Academic Press, pp. 285-312.
18. Keeley J. E. and Rundel P. W. 2005. Fire and the Miocene expansion of C4 grasslands. Ecol. Lett. 8: 683-690.
19. Long S. 1999. Environmental responses. - In: Sage R. F. and Monson R. K. (eds), C4 plant biology. Academic Press, pp. 215-249.
20. Milchunas D. G. et al. 2005. Elevated CO2 and defoliation effects on a shortgrass steppe: forage quality versus quantity for ruminants. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 111: 166-184.
21. Morgan J. A. et al. 2001. Elevated CO2 enhances water relations and productivity and affects gas exchange in C3 and C4 grasses of the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Global Change Biol. 7: 451-466.
22. Osborne C. P. 2008. Atmosphere, ecology and evolution: what drove the Miocene expansion of C4 grasslands? J. Ecol. 96: 35-45.
23. Osborne C. P. and Freckleton R. P. 2009. Ecological selection pressure for C4 photosynthesis in the grasses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276: 1753-1760.
24. Osborne C. P. et al. 2008. Low temperature effects on leaf physiology and survivorship in the C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata. J. Exp. Bot. 59: 1743-1754.
25. Owensby C. E. et al. 1996. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on forage quality for ruminants. - In: Körner C. and Bazzaz F. A. (eds), Carbon dioxide, populations, communities. Academic Press, pp. 363-371.
26. Ripley B. et al. 2010. Differences in drought sensitivities and photosynthetic limitations between co-occurring C3 and C4 (NADP-ME) Panicoid grasses. Ann. Bot. 105: 493-503.
27. Sage R. F. and Kubien D. S. 2003. Quo vadis C4? An ecophysiological perspective on global change and the future of C4 plants. Photosynth. Res. 77: 209-225.
28. Scheirs J. et al. 2001. A test of the C3-C4 hypothesis with two grass miners. Ecology 82: 410-421.
29. Wilson J. R. and Hattersley P. W. 1983. In vitro digestion of bundle sheath cells in rumen fluid and its relation to the suberized lamella and C4 photosynthetic types in Panicum species. Grass Forage Sci. 38: 219-223.
30. Winslow J. C. et al. 2003. The influence of seasonal water availability on global C3 versus C4 grassland biomass and its implications for climate change research. Ecol. Modell. 163: 153-173.
31. Woodward F. I. et al. 2004. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1465-1476.