Neuronal integration of dynamic sources: Bayesian learning and Bayesian inference

Chaos

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Siegelmann, Hava T ^a   Holzman, Lars E ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPSE;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONS; SYNAPSES;

EID: 78649428796     PISSN: 10541500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3491237     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Körding K.P. Wolpert D.M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature (London) 2004, 427:244. NATUAS, 0028-0836, 10.1038/nature02169.
2. Griffiths T.L. Tenenbaum J.B. Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17(9):767. 0956-7976, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x.
3. van Beers R.J. Wolpert D.M. Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaption. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:834. CUBLE2, 0960-9822, 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00836-9.
4. van Beers R.J. Sittig A.C. Denier van der Gon J.J. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:1355. JONEA4, 0022-3077.
5. Rao R.P. N. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in networks of spiking neurons. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2005, 17:1113. 1049-5258.
6. Ma W.J. Beck J.M. Latham P.E. Pouget A. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1432. NANEFN, 1097-6256, 10.1038/nn1790.
7. Zemel R. Dayan P. Pouget A. Probabilistic interpretation of population codes. Neural Comput. 1998, 10(2):403. NEUCEB, 0899-7667.
8. Zemel R.S. Quentin J.M. Huys M. Natarajan R. Dayan P. Probabilistic computation in spiking populations. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2005, 17:1609. 1049-5258.
9. Steimer A. Maass W. Douglas R. Belief-propagation in networks of spiking neurons. Neural Comput. 2009, 21:2502. NEUCEB, 0899-7667, 10.1162/neco.2009.08-08-837.
10. Stocker A. Simoncelli E.P. Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2006, 18:1291. 1049-5258.
11. Hinton G. What kind of graphical model is the brain?. 2005, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh.
12. Hinton G.E. Dayan P. Frey B.J. Neal R.M. The wake-sleep algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science 1995, 268:1158. SCIEAS, 0036-8075, 10.1126/science.7761831.
13. Rao R.P. N. Bayesian inference and attention in the visual cortex. NeuroReport 2005, 16:1843. NERPEZ, 0959-4965, 10.1097/01.wnr.0000183900.92901.fc.
14. Nessler B. Pfeiffer M. Maass W. Hebbian learning of Bayes optimal decisions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2009, 21:1169. 1049-5258.
15. Beck J.M. Kiani R. Ma W.J. Hanks T. Churchland A.K. Roitman J. Shadlen M.N. Lathan P.E. Pouget A. Probabilistic population codes for Bayesian decision making. Neuron 2008, 60:1142. NERNET, 0896-6273, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.021.
16. Koch C. Segev I. The role of single neurons in information processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:1171. NANEFN, 1097-6256, 10.1038/81444.
17. Pena J.L. Konishi M. Auditory spatial receptive fields created by multiplication. Science 2001, 292:249. SCIEAS, 0036-8075, 10.1126/science.1059201.
18. Trotter Y. Celebrini S. Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons. Nature (London) 1999, 398:239. NATUAS, 0028-0836, 10.1038/18444.
19. Treue S. Trujillo J.C. M. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature (London) 1999, 399:575. NATUAS, 0028-0836, 10.1038/21176.
20. Polsky A. Mel B.W. Schiller J. Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:621. NANEFN, 1097-6256, 10.1038/nn1253.
21. Poirazi P. Brannon T. Mel B.W. Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron 2003, 37:989. NERNET, 0896-6273, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00149-1.
22. Valiant L. Memorization and association on a realistic neural model. Neural Comput. 2005, 17:527. NEUCEB, 0899-7667, 10.1162/0899766053019890.
23. Siegelmann H.T. Neural Networks and Analog Computation: Beyond the Turing Limit 1998, (Birkhäuser, Boston, ).
24. Frey B.J. Jojic N. Comparison of algorithms for inference and learning in probabilistic graphical models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005, 27:1392. ITPIDJ, 0162-8828, 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.169.
25. Wainwright M.J. Estimating the wrong graphical model: Benefits in the computation limited setting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006, 7:1829. 1532-4435.
26. Globerson A. Weiss Y. Sontag D. Meltzer T. Jaakkola T. Tightening lp relaxations for map using message passing. 2008, and Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
27. Jensen F.V. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2001, (Springer, New York, ).
28. Freeman W.T. Yedidia J.S. Weiss Y. Understanding belief propagation and its generalizations. 2001, and Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA.
29. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference 1988, 2nd ed. (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, ).
30. Ernst U. Rotermund D. Pawelzik K. Efficient computation based on stochastic spikes. Neural Comput. 2007, 19:1313. NEUCEB, 0899-7667, 10.1162/neco.2007.19.5.1313.
31. Brown T.H. Kairiss E.W. Keenan C.L. Hebbian synapses: Biophysical mechanisms and algorithms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1990, 13:475. ARNSD5, 0147-006X, 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.002355.
32. Baddeley R.J. Ingram H.A. Miall R.C. System identification applied to a visuomotor task: Near-optimal human performance in a noisy changing task. J. Neurosci. 2003, 27(7):3066. JNRSDS, 0270-6474.
33. Deneve S. Pouget A. Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links. J. Physiol. Paris 2004, 98(1-3):249. JHYSEM, 0021-7948, 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.011.