Brazilian cerrado antioxidant sources: Cytotoxicity and phototoxicity in vitro;Fontes de antioxidantes do cerrado brasileiro: Citotoxicidade e fototoxicidade in vitro

Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 814-821

  Roesler, Roberta ^a   Lorencini, Márcio ^a   Pastore, Gláucia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

3T3 neutral red uptake; Antioxidant activity; Cerrado; Cytotoxicity; Phototoxicity; Tropical fruits

Indexed keywords

ANNONA; ANNONA CRASSIFLORA; CARYOCAR BRASILIENSE; EUGENIA DYSENTERICA;

EID: 78649421313     PISSN: 01012061     EISSN: 1678457X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-20612010000300038     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almeida, S. P. et al. Cerrado: espécies vegetais úteis. Planaltina: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - EMBRAPA, 1998.
2. Borenfreund, E.; Puerner, J. A. Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicology Letters, v. 24, n. 2-3, p. 119-124, 1985.
3. CENTRE FOR DOCUMENTATION ANDEVALUATION OFALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS - ZEBET; EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR THE VALIDATION OFALTERNATIVE METHODS - ECVAM; THE EUROPEAN COSMETICS TOILETRYANDPERFUMERYASSOCIATION - COLIPA. Standard Operating Procedure: In vitro 3T3 NRUphototoxicity test (OJ L 136 2000). 2000. Annex V Testing Methods.
4. Corrêa, P. Dicionário das plantas úteis do Brasil e das exóticas cultivadas. Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1984.
5. Costa, T. R. et al. Antifungal activity of volatile constituents of Eugenia dysenterica leaf oil. Journal of Ethonopharmacology, v. 72, n. 1-2, p. 111-117, 2000.
6. Ekwall, B. Screening of toxic compounds in mammalian cell cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 407, p. 64-77, 1983.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY- EPA. OPPTS Harmonized Test Guidelines. Guideline OPPTS 870.1100: Acute oral toxicity. 2002. EPA 712-c-02-190.
8. Gennari, A. et al. Strategies to replace in vivo acute systemic toxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 50. Alternative to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, v. 32, n. 4, p. 437-459, 2004.
9. GLOBALLYHARMONIZEDSYSTEM - GHS. Occupational Safety and Health Administrations: A guide to the GHS of classification and labeling of chemicals. 2005.
10. Grisham, J. W.; Smith, G. J. Predictive and mechanistic evaluation to toxic responses in mammalian cell culture systems. Pharmacological Reviews, v. 36, Suppl. 2, p. 151S-171S, 1984.
11. Halle, W. The registry of cytotocixity: Toxicity testing in cell cultures to predict acute toxicity (LD50) and to reduce testing in animals. Alternative to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, v. 31, n. 2, p. 89-198, 2003.
12. rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
13. Holzhütter, H. G. A general measure of in vitro phototoxicity derived from pairs of dose-response curves and its use for predicting the in vivo phototoxicity of chemicals. Alternative to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, v. 25, n. 4, p. 445-462, 1997.
14. Jayaprakasha, G. K.; RAO, L. J. Phenolic constituents from lichen Parmotrema stuppeum (Nyl.). Hale and their antioxidant activity. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. C, Journal of Bioscience, v. 55, n. 11-12, p. 1018-1022, 2000.
15. Londershausen, M. et al. Molecular mode of action of annonins. Pesticide Science, v. 33, n. 4, p. 427-438, 1991.
16. Lorenzi, H. Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. 2. ed. Nova Odessa: Plantarum, 1992. v. 2.
17. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFHEALTH- NIH. Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Methods: Guidance document on using in vitro data to estimate in vivo starting doses for acute toxicity. 2001. NIHPublication No. 01-4500.
18. NATIONAL TOXICOLOGYPROGRAM INTERAGENCYCENTER FOR THE EVALUATION OFALTERNATIVE TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS - NICEATM. Draft background review document: in vitro acute toxicity test methods. 2006.
19. NATIONAL TOXICOLOGYPROGRAM INTERAGENCYCENTER FOR THE EVALUATION OFALTERNATIVE TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS - NICEATM. Test Method Protocol: The BALB/c 3T3 neutral red uptake cytotoxicity test: a test for basal cytotoxicity phase III. 2003.
20. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION ANDDEVELOPMENT - OECD. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals: Acute oral toxicity - Up-and-down procedure. 2001. Guideline 425.
21. Peters, B.; Holzhütter, H. G. In vitro phototoxicity testing: development and validation of a new concentration response analysis software and biostatistical analyses related to the use of various prediction models. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals: ATLA, v. 30, n. 4, p. 415-432, 2002.
22. Rodrigues, V. E. G.; Carvalho, D. A. Plantas medicinais no domínio dos cerrados. Lavras: Editora da Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2001.
23. Roesler, R. et al. Antioxidant activity of A. crassiflora: characterization of major components by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Food Chemistry, v. 104, n. 3, p. 1048-1054, 2007a.
24. Roesler, R. et al. Atividade antioxidante de frutas do cerrado. Revista Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53-60, 2007b.
25. Roesler, R. etal. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of the Brazilian cerrado fruit Annona crassiflora (Araticum). Journal of Food Science, v. 71, n. 2, p. 102-107, 2006.
26. Septímio, L. R. A fitoterapia baseada em ervas medicinais do cerrado. Brasília, DF: Secretaria de Intercâmbio e Projetos Especiais - SIPE, 1994.
27. Shahidi, F. Natural Antioxidants: an overview. Illinois: AOCS Press, 1996.
28. Silva, J. A. et al. Frutas nativas dos cerrados. Planaltina: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - EMBRAPA), 1994.
29. Silva, S.; Tassara, H. Frutas no Brasil. 5 ed. São Paulo: Empresa das Artes, 2001.
30. Spielmann, H. et al. The international EU/COLIPA in vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (blind trial). Part 1: the 3T3 NRUphototoxicity test. Toxicology In Vitro, v. 12, n. 3, p. 305-327, 1998.
31. Weinberg, M. L. et al. Inhibition of drug-induced contractions of guinea-pig ileum by Annona crassiflora seed extract. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, v. 45, n. 1, p. 70-72, 1993.