Factors influencing self-efficacy judgments of university students in foreign language tutoring

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 618-635

  Matthews, Paul Harvey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649420792     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01057.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
2. Arnold, J. (Ed.). (1999). Affect in language learning. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
5. Bresnahan, M. I., & Cai, D. H. (1996). Gender and aggression in the recognition of interruption. Discourse Processes, 21, 171-189.
6. Brophy, J. E. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston McGraw-Hill.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
8. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A metaanalysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
9. Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.
10. Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. Modern Language Journal, 89, 19-36.
11. Cumming, A., & So, S. (1996). Tutoring second language text revision: Does the approach to instruction or the language of communication make a difference Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 197-226.
12. Derry, S. J., & Potts, M. K. (1998). How tutors model students: A study of personal constructs in adaptive tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 65-99.
13. Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.
14. Dörnyei, Z., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2001). Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
15. Dweck, C. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65, 34-39.
16. Fishbein, H. D., Eckart, T., Lauver, E., Van Leeuwen, R., & Langmeyer, D. (1990). Learners' questions and comprehension in a tutoring session. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 163-170.
17. Fletcher, D. C. (1998, March). Why it is important to recognize and understand the constructs that college writing center tutors bring to their tutoring sessions. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of the CUNY Writing Centers Association, New York (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED416495)
18. Fox, B. A. (1991). Cognitive and interactional aspects of correction in tutoring. In P. Goodyear (Ed.), Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring (pp. 149-172). Norwood, NJ Ablex.
19. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA Newbury House.
20. Goldberg, J. A. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power- and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 883-903.
21. Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C., Hacker, D. J., & Person, N. (1997). An anatomy of naturalistic tutoring. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 145-184). Cambridge, MA Brookline Books.
22. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
23. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Hu, X. (2002). Improving comprehension through discourse processing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002, 33-44.
24. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 495-522.
25. Hartman, H. J. (1990). Factors affecting the tutoring process. Journal of Developmental Education, 14, 2-4, 6.
26. Hock, M. F., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1995). Training strategic tutors to enhance learner independence. Journal of Developmental Education, 19, 18-20, 22-24, 26.
27. Huck, S. W., & Cormier, W. H. (1996). Reading statistics and research (2nd ed.). New York Harper-Collins.
28. Hume, G., Michael, J., Rovick, A., & Evens, M. (1996). Hinting as a tactic in one-on-one tutoring. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 23-47.
29. Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social-perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of expert tutors. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 6, pp. 217-237). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
30. Lepper, M. R., Drake, M. F., O'Donnell-Johnson, T. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108-144). Cambridge, MA Brookline Books.
31. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J.-L. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 75-105). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
32. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
33. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1994). Goal setting theory. In H. F. O'Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 13-29). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
34. MacDonald, R. B. (1991). An analysis of verbal interaction in college tutorials. Journal of Developmental Education, 15, 2-4, 6, 8, 10, 12.
35. Matthews, P. H. (2008). Achievement motivational characteristics of university foreign language learners: From the classroom to the tutoring table. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 611-626.
36. McArthur, D., Stasz, C., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 197-244.
37. Medway, F. J., & Baron, R. M. (1977). Locus of control and tutor's instructional style as determinants of cross-age tutoring effectiveness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 298-310.
38. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Merrill, S. K., & Landes, S. (1995). Tutoring: Guided learning by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 315-372.
39. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 277-305.
40. Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
41. Murata, K. (1994). Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 385-400.
42. Murray, S. O., & Covelli, L. H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103-111.
43. Nofsinger, R. E. (1991). Everyday conversation. Prospect Heights, IL Waveland Press.
44. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York Academic Press.
45. Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
46. Person, N. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Evolution of discourse during cross-age tutoring. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 69-86). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.
47. Person, N. K., Graesser, A. C., Magliano, J. P., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Inferring what the student knows in one-to-one tutoring: The role of student questions and answers. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 205-229.
48. Person, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161-188.
49. Putnam, R. T. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 13-48.
50. Rings, S., & Sheets, R. A. (1991). Student development and metacognition: Foundations for tutor training. Journal of Developmental Education, 15, 30-32.
51. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1-63.
52. Schunk, D. H. (1996a). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
53. Schunk, D. H. (1996b, April). Self-efficacy for learning and performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394663)
54. Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents' motivation. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29-52). Charlotte, NC IAP.
55. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). San Diego, CA Academic Press.
56. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
57. Thonus, T. (1999). Dominance in academic writing tutorials: Gender, language proficiency, and the offering of suggestions. Discourse & Society, 10, 225-248.
58. Thonus, T. (2002). Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is "success" Assessing Writing, 8, 110-134.
59. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2006). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading Cognitive Science, 30, 1-60.
60. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring Cognition and Instruction, 21, 209-249.
61. Walker, C. P., & Elias, D. (1987). Writing conference talk: Factors associated with high and low-rated writing conferences. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 266-285.
62. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramerae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 102-117). Rowley, MA Newbury House.
63. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. A. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum.