On-line prediction of tool wears by using methods of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic

Scientific Research and Essays

Volumn 5, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 2883-2888

  Başçiftçi, Fatih ^a   Şeker, Hüseyin ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Fuzzy logic; Tool condition monitoring; Tool wear; Turning

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649410221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19922248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chuangwen XU, Zhe LIU, Wencui LUO (2009). A Frequency Band Energy Analysis of Vibration Signals for Tool Condition Monitoring. Int. Conference Measuring Technol. Mechatronics Automation, 1: 385-388.
2. Dimla DE, Lister PM, Leighton NJ (1997). Neural Network Solutions to the Tool Condition Monitoring Problem in Metal Cutting-A Critical Review of Methods. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 37: 1219-1241.
3. Dimla DE, Lister PM (2000). On-Line Metal Cutting Tool Condition Monitoring Force and Vibration Analyses. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufacture, 40: 739-768.
4. Dutta RK, Paul S, Chattopadhyay AB (2000). Applicability Of The Modified Back-Propagation Algorithm In Tool Condition Monitoring For Faster Convergence. J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 98: 299-309.
5. Elbestawi MA, Dumitrescu M, Ng E-G (2006). Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing: Condition Monitoring and Control for Intelligent Manufacturing, pp. 55-82.
6. Jantunen E (2002). A Summary of Methods Applied to Tool Condition Monitoring in Drilling. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 42: 997-1010.
7. Lee SY (2006). In-Process Tool Condition Monitoring Systems in CNC Turning Operations. University of Iowa State. PhD Thesis.
8. Lever PJA, Marefat MM, Ruwani T (1997). A Machine Learning Approach to Tool Wea Behavior Operational Zones. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 33(1): 264-273.
9. Li X, Yingxue Y, Zhejun Y (1997). On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring System with Wavelet Fuzzy Neural Network. J. Intell. Manuf., 8: 271-276.
10. Li X (2001). A Brief Review: Acoustic Emission Method for Tool Wear Monitoring During Turning. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf., 42: 157-165.
11. Öztemel E (2003). Yapay Sinir Aǧlari{dotless}. Papatya Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k. I ̇stanbul.
12. Özel T, Karpat Y (2005). Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural Networks. Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf., 45: 467-469
13. Varma S, Baras JS (2002). Tools Wear Estimation from Acoustic Emissions: A Model Incorporating Wear-Rate. 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 1: 492-495.
14. Saǧlam H (2000). Tool Condition Monitoring Based on Multi-Component Force Measurements Using Artificial Neural Network in Milling. Selcuk University. Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. PhD Thesis.
15. Savage MD (1999). Multilevel On-Line Surface Roughness Recognition System In End Milling Operation. Iowa State University. PhD Thesis.
16. Savage LA (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control, 8: 338-353.
17. Sick B (2002). Fusion of Hard and Soft Computing Techniques in Indirect. Online Tool Wear Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man. and Cybernetics- Part C: Appl. Rev., 32(2): 80-91.