No kin discrimination in female mate choice of a parasitoid with complementary sex determination

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1301-1307

  Ruf, Daniel ^a   Mazzi, Dominique ^a   Dorn, Silvia ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

complementary sex determination; Cotesia glomerata; cuticular hydrocarbons; diploid males; genetic incompatibility; inbreeding avoidance; kin discrimination; mate choice

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARITY; CUTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HYDROCARBON; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; INCOMPATIBILITY; KIN RECOGNITION; MATE CHOICE; PARASITOID; PERCEPTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX DETERMINATION; SURVIVAL; WASP;

BRACONIDAE; COTESIA GLOMERATA; HYMENOPTERA;

EID: 78649385334     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq148     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Antolin MF. 1999. A genetic perspective on mating systems and sex ratios of parasitoid wasps. Res Popul Ecol. 41:29-37.
2. de Boer JG, Ode PJ, Vet LEM, Whitfield JB, Heimpel GE. 2007. Dip-loid males sire triploid daughters and sons in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia vestalis. Heredity. 99:288-294.
3. Bourdais D, Hance T. 2009. Lack of behavioural evidence for kin avoidance in mate choice in a hymenopteran parasitoid (Hymenop-tera: Braconidae). Behav Processes. 81:92-94.
4. Bretman A, Newcombe D, Tregenza T. 2009. Promiscuous females avoid inbreeding by controlling sperm storage. Mol Ecol. 18:3340-3345.
5. Bretman A, Wedell N, Tregenza T. 2004. Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimacu-latus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:159-164.
6. Brückner D. 1978. Why are there inbreeding effects in haplo-diploid systems? Evolution. 32:456-458.
7. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:237-268.
8. Cook JM. 1993. Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity. 71:421-435.
9. Cook JM, Crozier RH. 1995. Sex determination and population biology in the Hymenoptera. Trends Ecol Evol. 10:281-286.
10. Cowan DP, Stahlhut JK. 2004. Functionally reproductive diploid and haploid males in an inbreeding hymenopteran with complementary sex determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:10374-10379.
11. Dorn S, Beckage NE. 2007. Superparasitism in gregarious hymenop-teran parasitoids: ecological, behavioural and physiological perspectives. Physiol Entomol. 32:199-211.
12. Elias J, Mazzi D, Dorn S. 2009. No need to discriminate? Reproductive diploid males in a parasitoid with complementary sex determination. PLoS One. 4:e6024.
13. Feltwell J. 1982. Large white butterfly: the biology, biochemistry and physiology of Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus). Hague (The Netherlands): Junk Publishers.
14. Foster RL. 1992. Nestmate recognition as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Kans Entomol Soc. 65:238-243.
15. Frankham R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv. 126: 131-140.
16. Gamboa GJ. 2004. Kin recognition in eusocial wasps. Ann Zool Fen-nici. 41:789-808.
17. Gardner A, West SA. 2007. Social evolution: the decline and fall of genetic kin recognition. Curr Biol. 17:R810-R812.
18. Godfray HCJ. 1994. Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
19. Gu H, Dorn S. 2003. Mating system and sex allocation in the gregarious parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Anim Behav. 66:259-264.
20. Gu H, Wang Q, Dorn S. 2003. Superparasitism in Cotesia glomerata: response of hosts and consequences for parasitoids. Ecol Entomol. 28:422-431.
21. Heimpel GE, de Boer JG. 2008. Sex determination in the Hymenop-tera. Annu Rev Entom. 53:209-230.
22. Hein S, Poethke HJ, Dorn S. 2009. What stops the 'diploid male vortex'?-a simulation study for species with single locus complementary sex determination. Ecol Modell. 220:1663-1669.
23. Henter HJ. 2003. Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution. 57:1793-1803.
24. Herzner G, Schmitt T, Heckel F, Schreier P, Strohm E. 2006. Brothers smell similar: variation in the sex pheromone of male European bee-wolves Philanthus triangulum F. (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae) and its implications for inbreeding avoidance. Biol J Linn Soc. 89:433-442.
25. Howard RW. 2001. Cuticular hydrocarbons of adult Pteromalus cereal-ellae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and two larval hosts, angoumois grain moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and cowpea weevil (Colep-tera: Bruchidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 94:152-158.
26. Howard RW, Blomquist GJ. 2005. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu Rev Entomol. 50: 371-393.
27. Johansson BG, Jones TM. 2007. The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev. 82:265-289.
28. Keeling CI, Plettner E, Slessor KN. 2004. Hymenopteran semiochem-icals. In: Schulz S, editors. Chemistry of pheromones and other semi-ochemicals I. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. p. 133-177.
29. Keller L, Passera L. 1993. Incest avoidance, fluctuating asymetry and the consequences of inbreeding in Iridomyrmex humilis, an ant with multiple queen colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 33:191-199.
30. Laing JE, Levin DB. 1982. A review of the biology and a bibliography of Apanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Biocontrol News Inf. 3:7-23.
31. Lihoreau M, Rivault C. 2008. Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life. Behav Ecol. 20:46-53.
32. Lihoreau M, Zimmer C, Rivault C. 2007. Kin recognition and incest avoidance in a group-living insect. Behav Ecol. 18:880-887.
33. Lizé A, Carval D, Cortesero AM, Fournet S, Poinsot D. 2006. Kin discrimination and altruism in the larvae of a solitary insect. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 273:2381-2386.
34. Lizé A, Cortesero AM, Atlan A, Poinsot D. 2007. Kin recognition in Aleochara bilineata could support the kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Genetics. 175:1735-1740.
35. Mullen SP, Millar JG, Schal C, Shaw KL. 2008. Identification and characterization of cuticular hydrocarbons from a rapid species radiation of Hawaiian swordtailed crickets (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala). J Chem Ecol. 34:198-204.
36. Niven JE, Laughlin SB. 2008. Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J Exp Biol. 211: 1792-1804.
37. Ode PJ, Antolin MF, Strand MR. 1995. Brood-mate avoidance in the parasitic wasp Bracon hebetor Say. Anim Behav. 49:1239-1248.
38. Pfennig DW, Sherman PW. 1995. Kin recognition. Sci Am. 272: 98-103.
39. Reece SE, Shuker DM, Pen I, Duncan AB, Choudhary A, Batchelor CM, West SA. 2004. Kin discrimination and sex ratios in a parasitoid wasp. J Evol Biol. 17:208-216.
40. Rousset F, Roze D. 2007. Constraints on the origin and maintenance of genetic kin recognition. Evolution. 61:2320-2330.
41. Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature. 392:491-494.
42. Sakaluk SK, Eggert AK. 1996. Female control of sperm transfer and intraspecific variation in sperm precedence: antecedents to the evolution of a courtship food gift. Evolution. 50:694-703.
43. Shuker DM, Reece SE, Taylor JAL, West SA. 2004. Wasp sex ratios when females on a patch are related. Anim Behav. 68:331-336.
44. Shuker DM, Reece SE, Whitehorn PR, West SA. 2004. Sib-mating does not lead to facultative sex ratio adjustment in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Evol Ecol Res. 6:473-480.
45. Simmons LW. 1989. Kin recognition and its influence on mating preferences of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim Behav. 38:68-77.
46. Simmons LW. 1990. Pheromonal cues for the recognition of kin by female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav. 40:192-195.
47. Simmons LW. 1991. Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav. 41:493-501.
48. Singer TL. 1998. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. Am Zool. 38:394-405.
49. Stockley P. 1999. Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:1663-1669.
50. Stouthamer R, Luck RF, Werren JH. 1992. Genetics of sex determination and the improvement of biological control using parasitoids. Environ Entomol. 21:427-435.
51. Tagawa J. 2000. Sex allocation and clutch size in the gregarious larval endoparasitoid wasp, Cotesia glomerata. Entomol Exp Appl. 97: 193-202.
52. Tagawa J, Hidaka T. 1982. Mating behaviour of the braconid wasp, Apanteles glomeratus L (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): mating sequence and the factor for correct orientation of male to female. Appl Entomol Zool. 17:32-39.
53. Tagawa J, Kitano H. 1981. Mating behaviour of the braconid wasp, Apanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in the field. Appl Entomol Zool. 16:345-350.
54. Tagawa J, Yoshida C, Hashimoto T, Sudare A. 1987. Effects of mating on the oviposition behavior of the parasitic wasp, Apanteles glomer-atus L (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Ethol. 5:37-41.
55. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution. 52:1726-1730.
56. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol. 9:1013-1027.
57. Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature. 415:71-73.
58. Waldman B. 1987. Mechanisms of kin recognition. J Theor Biol. 128: 159-185.
59. Waldman B. 1988. The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 19:543-571.
60. Waldman B, Frumhoff PC, Sherman PW. 1988. Problems of kin recognition. Trends Ecol Evol. 3:8-13.
61. Wang Q, Gu H, Dorn S. 2003. Selection on olfactory response to semiochemicals from a plant-host complex in a parasitic wasp. Heredity. 91:430-435.
62. 44Ca in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 118:143-148.
63. Werren JH. 1993. The evolution of inbreeding in haplodiploid organisms. In: Thornhill NW, editors. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 42-94.
64. Whiting PW. 1940. Multiple alleles in sex determination of Habrobracon. J Morphol. 66:323-355.
65. Whiting PW. 1943. Multiple alleles complementary sex determination of Habrobracon. Genetics. 28:365-382.
66. Wright LI, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ. 2008. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv Genet. 9:833-843.
67. Zayed A, Packer L. 2005. Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:10742-10746.
68. Zellner BD, Bicchi C, Dugo P, Rubiolo P, Dugo G, Mondello L. 2008. Linear retention indices in gas chromatographic analysis: a review. Flavour Fragrance J. 23:297-314.
69. Zhou Y, Gu H, Dorn S. 2006. Single-locus sex determination in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Heredity. 96:487-492.
70. Zhou Y, Gu H, Dorn S. 2007. Effects of inbreeding on fitness components of Cotesia glomerata, a parasitoid wasp with single-locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD). Biol Control. 40:273-279.