Threat signaling in female song - Evidence from playbacks in a sex-role reversed bird species

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1147-1155

  Geberzahn, Nicole ^a,b   Goymann, Wolfgang ^b   Ten Cate, Carel ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

aggressive signals; female birdsong; sex role reversal; signal evolution; signal reliability; vocal communication

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; BIRD; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FEMALE; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; MATE ATTRACTION; RESEARCH WORK; SEX ROLE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING; SONG; TERRITORY; VOCALIZATION;

AFRICA;

ANIMALIA; AVES; CENTROPUS GRILLII;

EID: 78649343321     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq122     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
2. Arak A. 1983. Sexual selection by male-male competition in Natterjack toad choruses. Nature. 306:261-262.
3. Ballintijn MR, ten Cate C. 1997. Vocal development and its differentiation in a non-songbird: the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Behaviour. 134:595-621. (Pubitemid 127386125)
4. Ballintijn MR, ten Cate C. 1999. Variation in number of elements in the perch-coo vocalisation of the collard dove (Streptopelia decaocto) and what it may tell about the sender. Behaviour. 136:847-864.
5. Barbraud C, Mariani A, Jouventin P. 2000. Variation in call properties of the snow petrel, Pagodroma nivea, in relation to sex and body size. Aust J Zool. 48:421-430.
6. Bee MA, Perrill SA. 1996. Responses to conspecific advertisement calls in the green frog (Rana clamitans) and their role in male-male communication. Behavior. 133:283-301.
7. Bee MA, Perrill SA, Owen PC. 1999. Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 45:177-184.
8. Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc. 58:385-399.
9. Brunton DH, Li XL. 2006. The song structure and seasonal patterns of vocal behavior of male and female bellbirds (Anthornis melanura). J Ethol. 24:17-25.
10. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird song: biological themes and variations. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H, Ballintijn MR. 2002. Birdsong and male-male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto).Adv Study Behav. 31:31-75.
12. Collins SA. 2004. Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of bird-song. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H, editors. Nature's music: the science of birdsong. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. pp. 39-79.
13. Cooney R, Cockburn A. 1995. Territorial defense is the major function of female song inthe superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus. Anim Behav. 49:1635-1647.
14. Cramer ERA, Price JJ. 2007. Red-winged blackbirds Ageliaus phoeni-ceus respond differently to song types with different performance levels. J Avian Biol. 38:122-127.
15. Dabelsteen T. 2004. Strategies that facilitate or counter eavesdropping on vocal interactions in songbirds. An Acad Bras Cienc. 76:274-278.
16. Davies NB, Halliday TR. 1978. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature. 274:683-685.
17. Geberzahn N, Goymann W, Muck C, ten Cate C. 2009. Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 64:193-204.
18. Gil D, Gahr M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:133-141.
19. Goymann W, Kempenaers B, Wingfield JC. 2005. Breeding biology, sexually dimorphic development and nestling testosterone concentrations of the classically polyandrous African black coucal, Centro-pus grillii. J Ornithol. 146:314-324.
20. Goymann W, Wingfield JC. 2004. Competing females and caring male birds. Sex steroids inAfrican black coucals, Centropus grillii. Anim Behav. 68:733-740.
21. Goymann W, Wittenzellner A, Wingfield JC. 2004. Competing females and caring male birds. Polyandry and sex-role reversal in African black coucals, Centropus grillii. Ethology. 110:807-823. (Pubitemid 39428865)
22. Hall ML, Illes A, Vehrencamp SL. 2006. Overlapping signals in banded wrens: long-term effects of prior experience on male birds and females. Behav Ecol. 17:260-269.
23. Hardouin LA, Reby D, Bavoux C, Burneleau G, Bretagnolle V. 2007. Communication of male quality in owl hoots. Am Nat. 169: 552-562.
24. Held J, Manser T. 2005. A PDA-based system for online recording and analysis of concurrent events in complex behavioral processes. Behav Res Methods. 37:155-164.
25. Illes AE, Hall ML, Vehrencamp SL. 2006. Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 273:1907-1912.
26. Illes AE, Yunes-Jimenez L. 2009. A female songbird out-sings male conspecifics during simulated territorial intrusions. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 276:981-986.
27. Järvi T, Radesater T, Jacobsson S. 1980. The song of the willow warbler Phylloscopus trochilus with special reference to singing behavior in agonistic situations. Ornis Scandinavica. 11:236-242.
28. De Kort SR, Eldermire ERB, Cramer ERA, Vehrencamp SL. 2009. The deterrent effect of bird song in territory defense. Behav Ecol. 20: 200-206.
29. Langmore NE. 2000. Why female birds sing. In: Espmark Y, editors. Adaptive Significance of Signaling and Signal Design in Animal Communication. Trondheim, Norway: Transactionsof the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters. pp. 389-399.
30. McGregor PK. 1991. Quantifying responses to playback-one, many, or composite multivariate measures. In: McGregor PK, editors. Nato Advanced Research Workshop on Playback and Studies of Animal Communication: Problems and Prospects. Chesterfield: Plenum Press Div Plenum Publishing Corp. pp. 79-96.
31. Miyazaki M, Waas JR. 2003. Acoustic properties of male advertisement and their impact on female responsiveness in little penguins Eudyptula minor. J. Avian Biol. 43:229-232.
32. Muck C, Kempenaers B, Kuhn S, Valcu M, Goymann W. 2009. Paternity in the classical polyandrous black coucal (Centropus grillii)-a cuckoo accepting cuckoldry? Behav Ecol. 20:1185-1193.
33. Nelson DA, Croner LJ. 1991. Song categories and their functions in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Auk. 108:42-52.
34. Otter KA, Ratcliffe L, Njegovan M, Fotheringham J. 2002. Importance of frequency and temporal song matching in black-capped chickadees: evidence from interactive playback. Ethology. 108: 181-191.
35. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, and the R Core Team. 2009. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-96, published: 15. October 2009.
36. Price JJ. 2009. Evolution and life-history correlates of female song in the New World blackbirds. Behav Ecol. 20:967-977.
37. Price JJ, Lanyon SM, Omland KE. 2009. Losses of female song with changes from tropical to temperate breeding in the New World blackbirds. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 276:1971-1980.
38. Price JJ, Yunes-Jimenez L, Osorio-Beristain M, Omland KE, Murphy TG. 2008. Sex-role reversal in song? Females sing more frequently than male birds in the Streak-backed Oriole. Condor. 110:387-392.
39. Rappole JH, Tipton AR. 1991. New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters tosmall passerines. J Field Ornithol. 62:335-337.
40. Riebel K. 2003. The 'mute' sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv Study Behav. 33:49-86.
41. Riebel K, Hall ML, Langmore NE. 2005. Female songbirds still struggling to be heard. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:419-420.
42. Searcy WA, Beecher MD. 2009. Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Anim Behav. 78:1281-1292.
43. Searcy WA, Nowicki S. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
44. Slabbekoorn H, ten Cate C. 1997. Stronger territorial responses to frequency modulated coos in collared doves. Anim Behav. 54: 955-965.
45. Slater PJB, Mann NI. 2004. Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics?J Avian Biol. 35:289-294.
46. Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
47. Todt D, Naguib M. 2000. Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav. 29:247-296.
48. Vernon CJ. 1971. Notes on the biology of the black coucal. Ostrich. 42:242-258.
49. Wagner WE Jr. 1989. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard's cricket frog. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 25:429-436.