Stronger territorial responses to frequency modulated coos in collared doves

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 955-965

  Slabbekoorn, Hans ^a   Cate, Carel Ten ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLARED DOVE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VOCALIZATION;

COLUMBIFORMES; STREPTOPELIA DECAOCTO;

EID: 0030867088     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0499     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227-267.
2. Aubin, T. 1987. Respective parts of the carrier and of the frequency modulation in the semantics of distress calls. Behaviour, 100, 123-133.
3. Ballintijn, M. R. & ten Cate, C. 1997a. Sex differences in the vocalisations and syrinx of the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Auk, 114, 22-39.
4. Ballintijn, M. R. & ten Cate, C. 1997b. Vocal development and its differentiation in a non-songbird: the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Behaviour, 134, 595-621.
5. Beani, L. & Dessi-Fulgherí, F. 1995. Mate choice in the grey partridge, Perdix perdix: a role of physical and behavioural male traits. Anim. Behav., 49, 347-356.
6. Becker, P. H. 1982. The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. I (Ed. by D. E. Kroodsma, E. H. Miller & H. Quellet), pp. 213-252. New York: Academic Press.
7. Braaten, R. F., Hulse, S. H. & Page, S. C. 1990. Discrimination and classification of rising and nonrising pitch patterns by the European starling. Anim. Learn. Behav., 18, 352-364.
8. Brémond, J.-C. 1976. Specific recognition in the song of Bonelli's warbler (Phylloscopus bonelli). Behaviour, 58, 99-116.
9. Bretagnolle, V. 1989. Calls of Wilson's storm petrel: functions, individual and sexual recognition, and geographic variation. Behaviour, 109, 98-112.
10. ten Cate, C. 1992. Coo types in the collared dove Streptopelia decaocto: one theme, distinctive variations. Bioacoustics, 4, 161-183.
11. ten Cate, C. & Ballintijn, M. R. 1996. Dove coos and flash lights: the interruptability of 'song' in a non-songbird. J. comp. Psychol., 110, 267-275.
12. Catchpole, C. K. 1987. Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2, 94-97.
13. Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 1990. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Anim. Behav., 40, 1158-1168.
14. Davies, N. B. & Halliday, T. R. 1978. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature, Lond., 274, 683-685.
15. Dooling, R. J. 1982. Auditory perception in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. I (Ed. by D. E. Kroodsma, E. H. Miller & H. Quellet), pp. 95-130. New York: Academic Press.
16. Dooling, R. J. 1989. Perception of complex, species-specific vocalizations by birds and humans. In: The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (Ed. by R. J. Dooling & S. H. Hulse), pp. 423-444. Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Emlen, S. 1972. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour, 41, 130-171.
18. Engineering Design 1992. SIGNAL Software Manual. Engineering Design, Belmont.
19. Falls, J. B. 1963. Properties of bird song eliciting responses from territorial males. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr., XIII, 259-271.
20. Forrester, D. C. & Czarnowsky, R. 1985. Sexual selection in the spring peeper, Hyla crucifer: role of the advertisement call. Behaviour, 92, 112-128.
21. Gaioni, S. J. & Evans, C. S. 1986. Perception of distress calls in mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos). Behaviour, 99, 250-274.
22. Gürtler, W. 1973. Artisolierende Parameter des Revierrufs der Türkentaube, Streptopelia decaocto. J. Ornithol., 114, 305-316.
23. Gürtler, W. 1977. Analyse der artkennzeichnenden Parameter im Revierruf der Türkentaube (Streptopelia decaocto) mit weiteren Untersuchungen ihres Rufrepertoires. Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
24. Johnsrude, I. S., Weary, D. M., Ratcliffe, L. M. & Weisman, R. G. 1994. Effect of motivational context on conspecific song discrimination by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). J. comp. Psychol., 108, 172-178.
25. Kroodsma, D. E. 1989. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Anim. Behav., 37, 600-609.
26. Kroodsma, D. E. & Byers, B. E. 1991. The function(s) of bird song. Am. Zool., 31, 318-328.
27. Leonard, M. L. & Horn, A. G. 1995. Crowing in relation to status in roosters. Anim. Behav., 49, 1283-1290.
28. Lohr, B., Weisman, R. & Nowicki, S. 1994. The role of pitch cues in song recognition by Carolina chickadees (Parus carolinensis). Behaviour, 130, 1-15.
29. Moody, D. B. & Stebbins, W. C. 1989. Salience of frequency modulation in primate communication. In: The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (Ed. by R. J. Dooling & S. H. Hulse), pp. 353-378. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Morton, E. S. 1982. Grading, discreteness, redundancy, and motivation-structured rules. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. I (Ed. by D. E. Kroodsma, E. H. Miller & H. Quellet), pp. 183-213. New York: Academic Press.
31. Nelson, D. A. 1989. Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). J. comp. Psychol., 103, 171-176.
32. Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. 1989. Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: bird song. Science, 244, 976-978.
33. Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. 1990. The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. In: Comparative Perception. Vol. II (Ed. by W. C. Stebbins & M. A. Berkley), pp. 443-478. New York: John Wiley.
34. Noldus Information Technology 1994. The Observer system for collection and analysis for observational data. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Noldus Information Technology b.v.
35. Robisson, P. 1990. The importance of the temporal pattern of syllables and the syllable structure of display calls for individual recognition in the genus Aptenodytes. Behav. Proc., 22, 157-163.
36. Robisson, P. 1992. Roles of pitch and duration in the discrimination of the mate's call in the king penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus. Bioacoustics, 4, 25-36.
37. Ryan, M. J. 1980. Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog. Science, 203, 523-525.
38. Ryan, M. J. 1983a. Frequency modulated calls and species recognition in a Neotropical frog. J. comp. Physiol, 150, 217-221.
39. Ryan, M. J. 1983b. Sexual selection and communication in a Neotropical frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution, 37, 261-272.
40. Shiovitz, K. A. & Lemon, A. E. 1980. Species identification of song by indigo buntings as determined by responses to computer generated sounds. Behaviour, 74, 167-199.
41. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Sinnott, J. M., Sachs, M. B. & Hienz, R. D. 1980. Aspects of frequency discrimination in passerine birds and pigeons. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 94, 401-415.
43. Slabbekoorn, H. & ten Cate, C. 1996. Responses of collared doves to playback of coos. Behav. Proc., 38, 169-174.
44. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman.
45. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. & Willis, M. S. 1990. Strong neighbour-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. Condor, 92, 1051-1056.
46. Vallet, E. & Kreutzer, M. 1995. Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. Anim. Behav., 49, 1603-1610.
47. Wagner, W. E. Jr. 1989. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard's cricket frog. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 25, 429-436.
48. Weary, D. M. 1990. Categorization of song notes in great tits: which acoustic features are used and why? Anim. Behav., 39, 450-457.
49. Weisman, R., Njegovan, M. & Ito, S. 1994. Frequency ratio discrimination by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens). J. comp. Psychol., 108, 363-372.
50. West, M. J., King, A. P. & Eastzer, D. H. 1981. Validating the female bioassay of cowbird song: relating differences in song potency to mating success. Anim. Behav., 29, 490-501.
51. Wilczynski, W., Rand, A. S. & Ryan, M. J. 1995. The processing of spectral cues by the call analysis system of the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim. Behav., 49, 911-929.