The simulation of phenological development in dynamic crop model: The Bayesian comparison of different methods

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 101-115

  Ceglar, Andrej ^a   Črepinšek, Zalika ^a   Kajfež Bogataj, Lučka ^a   Pogačar, Tjaša ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Bayesian calibration; Bayesian model comparison; Dynamic crop model; Phenological development; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLIMATE PREDICTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROP YIELD; GROWTH MODELING; HIGH TEMPERATURE; MAIZE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHENOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER AVAILABILITY; YIELD RESPONSE;

SLOVENIA;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78649329876     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arhondistis G.B., Papantou D., Zhang W., Perhar G., Massos E., Shi M. Bayesian calibration of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical models and benefits for environmental management. J. Marine Syst. 2008, 73:8-30.
2. Awal M.A., Koshi H., Ikeda T. Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agric. Forest. Meteorol. 2006, 139:74-83.
3. Birch C.J., Vos J., Van der Putten P.E.L. Plant development and leaf area production in contrasting cultivars of maize grown in a cool temperate environment in the field. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19:173-188.
4. Boogard, H.L., Van Diepen, C.A., Rotter, R.P., Cabrera, J.C.M.A., Van Laar, H.H., 1998. WOFOST 7.1 User Guide for the WOFOST 7.1 Crop Growth Simulation Model and WOFOST Control Center 5.1. Techn. Doc. 52, Alterra, WUR, Wageningen, p. 144.
5. Boons-Prins, E.R., deKonig, G.H.J, van Diepen, C.A., de Vries, P., 1993. Crop Specific Simulation Parameters for Yield Forecasting Across the European Community. Simulation Reports CABO-TT. No. 32. CABO-DLO Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen.
6. Campbell E.P., Fox D.R., Bates B.C. A Bayesian approach to parameter estimation and pooling in nonlinear flood event models. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35:211-220.
7. Campos H., Cooper M., Habben J.E., Edmeades G.O., Schussler J.R. Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res. 2004, 90:19-34.
8. Cukier R.I., Fortuin C., Shukler K.E., Petshek A.G., Schaibly J.H. Study of sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59:3873-3878.
9. Čergan Z. The morphology of the maize. The Maize 2008, 22-40. Založba Kmečki glas, Ljubljana. Z. Čergan, V. Jejčič, M. Knapič, T. Modic, B. Moljk, T. Poje, A. Simončič, J. Sušin, G. Urek, J. Verbič, B. Vrščaj, M. Žerjav (Eds.).
10. Driessen P.M. The collection and treatment of basic data. Introduction. Modeling of Agricultural Production: Weather, Soils and Crops 1986, 203-207. Pudoc, Wageningen. H. Van Keulen, J. Wolf (Eds.).
11. Gallagher M., Doherty J. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis for a watershed model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22:1000-1020.
12. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, Chapman & and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, p. 688. second ed.
13. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:457-511.
14. Hassan A.E., Bekhit H.M., Chapman J.B. Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo to quantify parameter uncertainty and its effect on predictions of a groundwater flow model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:749-763.
15. Huard D., Mailhot A. Calibration of hydrological model GR2M using Bayesian uncertainty analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W02424.
16. Hunt, L.A., Yan, W., McMaster, G.S., 2002. Simulating response to temperature. In: White, J.W. (Ed.), 2003. Modeling Temperature Response in Wheat and Maize: Proceedings of a Workshop, CIMMYT, El Batau, Mexico, 23-25 April 2001. NRG-GIS Series 03-01.1. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F., p. 60.
17. Iizumi T., Yokozawa M., Nishimori M. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of a large scale crop model paddy rice: application of a Bayesian approach. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 149:333-348.
18. Jones C.A., Kiniry J.R. CERES-Maize. A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development 1986, Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, p. 180.
19. Jones J.W., Hogenboom G., Porter C.H., Boote K.J., Batchelor W.D., Hunt P.W., Wilkens U.S., Gijsman A.J., Ritchie T.J. The DSSAT Cropping System Model. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18:235-265.
20. Kajfež-Bogataj, L., 1989. Modeling of Yield as a Function of Ecosystem: Doctoral Thesis. Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, p. 124.
21. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1995, 90:773-795.
22. Kropff M.J., van Laar H.H., ten Berge H.F.M. ORYZA1: A Basic Model for Irrigated Lowland Rice Production 1993, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, p. 89.
23. Latiffe H.R., Edmeades G.O., Johnson E.C. Temperature response of tropical maize cultivars selected for broad adaptation. Field Crop Res. 1997, 49:215-229.
24. Lehuger S., Gabrielle B., van Oijen M., Makowski D., Germon J.C., Morvan T., Henault C. Bayesian calibration of nitrous oxide emission module of an agro-ecosystem model. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 133:208-222.
25. Lindquist J.L. Performance of INTERCOM for predicting corn-velvetleaf across north-central United States. Weed Sci. 2001, 49:195-201.
26. Liu Z., Martina M.V.L., Todini E. Flood forecasting using a fully distributed model: application of the TOPKAPI model to the Upper Xixian Catchment. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2005, 9(4):347-364.
27. Makowski D., Hillier J., Wallach D., Andrieu B., Jeuffroy M.H. Parameter estimation for crop models. Working with Dynamic Crop Models. Evaluation, Analysis, Parameterization and Applications 2006, 120-140. Elsevier, (Chapter 4). D. Wallach, D. Makowski, J.W. Jones (Eds.).
28. Makowski D., Wallach D., Tramblay M. Using a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation; comparison of the GLUE and MCMC methods. Agronomie 2002, 22:191-203.
29. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Available online from:. http://www.r-project.org/.
30. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Chan K. A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 1999, 41:39-56.
31. Samanta S., Mackay D.S., Clayton M.K., Kruger E.L., Ewers B.E. Bayesian analysis for uncertainty estimation of a canopy transpiration model. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W04424.
32. Streck N.A., Matielo de Paula F.L., Bisognin D.A., Heldwein A.B., Dellai J. Simulating the development of field grown potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agric. For. Meteorol. 2007, 142:1-11.
33. Urbanek S. Parallel Processing of R Code on Machines with Multiple Cores or CPUs. Version 0.1-3 2009, http://www.rforge.net/multicore.
34. van Heemst, H.D.J., 1988. Plant Data Values Required for Simple Crop Growth Simulation Models: Review and Bibliography. Simulation Reports CABO-TT 17. Centre for Agrobiological Research (CABO), Wageningen & Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, p. 100.
35. van Ittersum M.K., Leffelaar P.A., van Keulen H., Kropff M.J., Bastiaans L., Goudriaan J. On approaches and applications of Wageningen crop models. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 18:201-234.
36. van Keulen, H., Wolf, J., 1986. Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. Simulation Monographs. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 479.
37. Van Oijen M., Rougier J., Smith R. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25:915-927.
38. Wang E., Engel T. Simulation of phenological development of wheat crops. Agric. Syst. 1998, 58:1-24.
39. Wang H.L., Gan Y.T., Wang R.J., Niu J.Y., Zhao Q.G., Li Q.G. Phenological trends in winter wheat and spring cotton in response to climate changes in northwest China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148:1242-1251.
40. Yang H.S., Dobermann A., Lindquist J.L., Walters D.T., Arkebauer T. Hybrid maize-a maize simulation model that combines two crop modeling approaches. Field Crops Res. 2004, 87:131-154.
41. Zhang T., Zhu J., Yang X. Non-stationary thermal time accumulation reduces the predictability of climate change effects in agriculture. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148:1412-1418.