Performance of INTERCOM for predicting cornvelvetleaf interference across north-central United States

Weed Science

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 195-201

  Lindquist, John L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

ABUTH; Competition; Crop modeling; Ecophysiology; Leaf area index; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009355645     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0195:POIFPC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Boote, K. J., J. W. Jones, and N. B. Pickering. 1996. Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron. J. 88:704-716.
2. Bridges, D. C. 1992. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States - 1992. Weed Science Society of America. pp. 75-147.
3. 4 plants. Oecologia 54:233-235.
4. Cardina, J., E. Regnier, and D. Sparrow. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional and notillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 43:81-87.
5. Caton, B. P., T. C. Foin, and J. E. Hill. 1999a. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. I. Development and sensitivity analyses of monoculture growth. Field Crops Res. 62: 129-143.
6. Caton, B. P., T. C. Foin, and J. E. Hill. 1999b. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. II. Validation testing of water-depth effects and monoculture growth. Field Crops Res. 62:145-155.
7. Caton, B. P., T. C. Foin, and J. E. Hill. 1999c. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. III. Interspecific competition for light. Field Crops Res. 63:47-61.
8. Coble, H. D. and D. A. Mortensen. 1992. The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technol. 6:191-195.
9. 2, plant nitrogen status and the susceptibility of plants to an acute increase in temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 14: 667-674.
10. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
11. Cousens, R. 1987. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Prot. Q. 2:13-20.
12. de Wit, C. T., J. Goudriaan, H. H. van Laar, F.W.T. Penning de Vries, R. Rabbinge, H. van Keulen, L. Sibma, and C. de Jonge. 1978. Simulation of Assimilation, Respiration and Transpiration of Crops. Simulation Monographs. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc. p. 35.
13. El-Sharkawy, A. M., J. H. Cock, and A. Del Pilar Hernandez. 1985. Stomatal response to air humidity and its relation to stomatal density in a wide range of warm climate species. Photosynth. Res. 7:137-149.
14. Graf, B., A. P. Gutierrez, O. Rakotobe, P. Zahner, and W. Delucchi. 1990. A simulation model for the dynamics of rice growth and development: Part II - The competition with weeds for nitrogen and light. Agric. Syst. 32:367-392.
15. Graf, B. and J. E. Hill. 1992. Modelling the competition for light and nitrogen between rice and Echinochloa crus-galli. Agric. Syst. 40:345-359.
16. Janssen, P.H.M. and P.S.C. Heuberger. 1995. Calibration of process-oriented models. Ecol. Model. 83:55-66.
17. Jordan, N. 1992. Weed demography and population dynamics: implications for threshold management. Weed Technol. 6:184-190.
18. Kiniry, J. R., J. R. Williams, P. W. Gassman, and P. Debaeke. 1992. A general, process oriented model for two competing plant species. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 35:801-810.
19. Kiniry, J. R., J. R. Williams, R. L. Vanderlip, J. D. Atwood, D. C. Reicosky, J. Mulliken, W. J. Cox, H. J. Mascagni, S. E. Hollinger, and W. J. Wiebold. 1997. Evaluation of two maize models for nine U.S. locations. Agron. J. 89:421-426.
20. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 42:568-573.
21. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
22. Kropff, M. J. 1993. Mechanisms of competition for light. Pages 33-61 in M. J. Kropff and H. H. van Laar, eds. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International and International Rice Research Institute.
23. Kropff, M. J., K. Moody, J. L. Lindquist, T. R. Migo, and F. F. Fajardo. 1994. Models to predict yield loss due to weeds in rice ecosystems. Philipp. J. Weed Sci. (Special Issue):29-44.
24. Kropff, M. J. and C.J.T. Spitters. 1992. An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. I. Model description and parameterization. Weed Res. 32:437-450.
25. Kropff, M. J., C.J.T. Spitters, B. J. Schnieders, W. Joenje, and W. de Groot. 1992. An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. II. Model evaluation. Weed Res. 32:451-464.
26. Kropff, M. J. and H. H. van Laar. 1993. Modelling crop-weed interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International and International Rice Research Institute. 274 p.
27. Lindquist, J. L. and M. J. Kropff. 1996. Applications of an ecophysiological model for irrigated rice (Oryza sativa)-Echinochloa competition. Weed Sci. 44:52-56.
28. Lindquist, J. L. and D. A. Mortensen. 1998. Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci. 46:569-574.
29. Lindquist, J. L. and D. A. Mortensen. 1999. Ecophysiological characteristics of four maize hybrids and Abutilon theophrasti. Weed Res. 39: 271-285.
30. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, S. A. Clay, R. Schmenk, J. J. Kells, K. Howatt, and P. Westra. 1996. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 44:309-313.
31. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, P. Westra, et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195-200.
32. Maxwell, B. D. 1992. Weed thresholds: the space component and considerations for herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 6:205-212.
33. Mitchell, P. L. 1997. Misuse of regression for empirical validation of models. Agric. Syst. 54:313-326.
34. Montgomery, D. C. 1991. Design and analysis of experiments. 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 42-45.
35. Morison, J.I.L. and R. M. Gifford. 1983. Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity. Plant Physiol. 71:789-796.
36. Patterson, D. T. 1992. Temperature and canopy development of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6: 68-76.
37. Ryel, R., P. W. Barnes, W. Beyschlag, M. M. Caldwell, and S. D. Flint. 1990. Plant competition for light analyzed with a multispecies canopy model. I. Model development and influence of enhanced UV-B conditions on photosynthesis in mixed wheat and wild oat canopies. Oecologia 82:304-310.
38. Swinton, S. M. and R. P. King. 1994. A bioeconomic model for weed management in corn and soybean. Agric. Syst. 44:313-335.
39. Tollenaar, M. 1989. Response of dry matter accumulation in maize to temperature: II. Leaf photosynthesis. Crop Sci. 29:1275-1279.
40. Wilkerson, G. G., J. W. Jones, H. D. Coble, and J. L. Gunsolus. 1990. SOYWEED: a simulation model of soybean and common cocklebur growth and competition. Agron. J. 82:1003-1010.