Overcoming obstacles encountered on the way to commercialize university IP

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 671-679

  Klein, Raphael ^a   de Haan, Uzi ^a   Goldberg, Albert I ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Exploration; Technology transfer; TTO; University IP commercialization

Indexed keywords

FACULTY MEMBERS; FINANCIAL RESULTS; OVERCOMING OBSTACLES; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICES; TTO; UNIVERSITY IP COMMERCIALIZATION;

NATURAL RESOURCES EXPLORATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 78649317584     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-009-9143-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aghib, D. F. (2007). Ph. D., Former executive, Business Development, MOLTENI FARMACEUTICI. Interview by author. San Francisco, California. 24 February.
2. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-57.
3. AUTM. (2005). U. S. licensing survey: FY 2004. Northbrook, IL: The Association of University Technology Managers.
4. Azoulay, P. (2004). A preview of work with Ding, W. and Stuart, T. entitled "The impact of academic patenting on (public) research output". Presented on December 12 at the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
5. Bachar, T. (2009). Managing Director, FE Medical Systems Israel Ltd. Interview by author. Tirat Carmel, Israel. 14 January.
6. Bayh-Dole (1980). http://history. nih. gov/research/downloads/PL96-517. pdf.
7. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 175-188.
8. Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Colyvas, J., et al. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61-72.
10. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209-227.
11. Holstein, W. J. (2006). Putting bright ideas to work off campus. The New York Times. 5 November.
12. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Matkin, G. (1997). University technology transfer and the problems of conflict of interest. 96. In Y. S. Lee (Ed.), Technology transfer and public policy. Quorum Books.
14. Noble, D. (1977). America by design: Science, technology and the rise of corporate capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan.
16. Powel, A. (2005). Kohlberg is named chief technology development officer. Harvard University Gazette. http://www. news. harvard. edu/gazette/2004/11. 11/03-kohlberg. html.
17. Reimers, N. (2007). Founder, Stanford University's office of technology licensing. Interview by author (by telephone). 13 September.
18. Robb, W. L. (2009). Ph. D. Former Senior Vice President for Corporate Research and Development of General Electric Company. Correspondence by email with the author. Schenectady, New York. 7, 8 and 9 January.
19. Sandelin, J. (2007). Senior Licensing Associate Emeritus, Stanford University's Office of Technology Licensing. Interviews by author. Palo Alto, California. 27 February and 11 September.
20. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship. UK: Edward Elgar.
21. Sivan, T. (2007). Graduate seminar in entrepreneurship. Haifa: Technion, Israel Institute of Technology.
22. Stanford University. (2006). Office of Technology Licensing Annual Report 2004-2005.
23. Stanford University. (2008). Stanford Office of Technology Licensing Annual Report 2006-2007.
24. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant, basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
25. Strandburg, K. J. (2005). Curiosity-driven research and university technology transfer. In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), University entrepreneurship and technology: Process, design, and intellectual property (pp. 93-122). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26. Supreme Court. (2006). http://www. supremecourtus. gov/opinions/06pdf/04-1350. pdf October. Washington, DC.
27. Swamidass, P. M., & Vulasa, V. (2009). Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer. The Journal of technology transfer, 34, 343-363.
28. Thayer, A. (2003). Nanomaterials. Chemical and Engineering News, 81(35), 15-22.
29. University of Virginia. (2007). University inventions that changed the world. http://www. uvapf. org/index. cfm/fuseaction/viewpage/page_id/115?CFID=177.
30. Utek Corporation. (2007). http://www. utekcorp. com/documents/Successful%20Technology%20Transfers. pdf.
31. van Looy, B., et al. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33, 425-441.
32. Wiesendanger, H. (2007). Ph. D., Senior Licensing Associate Emeritus, Stanford University's Office of Technology Licensing. Interview by author. Palo Alto, California. 14 February.