Diagnostic imaging of periprosthetic joint infections

Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Musculoskeletal Infection

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 67-72

  Parvizi, Javad ^a   Morrison, William B ^a   Alavi, Abbas ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649316244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (14)

1. Ackerman SJ, Gitlin JN, Gayler RW, et al: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of fracture and pneumonia detection: Comparison of laser-digitized workstation images and conventional analog radiographs. Radiology 1993;186: 263-268.
2. Toms AD, Davidson D, Masri BA, Duncan CP: The management of peri-prosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88: 149-155.
3. Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE: Periprosthetic sepsis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;420: 26-31.
4. Stumpe KD, Notzli HP, Zanetti M, et al: FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: Comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 2004;231: 333-341.
5. Levitsky KA, Hozack WJ, Balderston RA, et al: Evaluation of the painful prosthetic joint: Relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate, and joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty 1991;6: 237-244.
6. Palestro CJ, Swyer AJ, Kim CK, Goldsmith SJ: Infected knee prosthesis: Diagnosis with In-111 leukocyte, Tc-99m sulfur colloid, and Tc-99m MDP imaging. Radiology 1991;179: 645-648.
7. Pill SG, Parvizi J, Tang PH, et al: Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and (111)indium-white blood cell imaging in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection of the hip. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(6 suppl 2): 91-97.
8. Zhuang H, Yu JQ, Alavi A: Applications of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging in the detection of infection and inflammation and other benign disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 2005;43: 121-134.
9. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW: Periprosthetic infection: What are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(suppl 4): 138-147.
10. Vanquickenborne B, Maes A, Nuyts J, et al: The value of (18)FDG-PET for the detection of infected hip prosthesis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30: 705-715.
11. Mumme T, Reinartz P, Alfer J, Muller-Rath R, Buell U, Wirtz DC: Diagnostic values of positron emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scan in hip arthroplasty loosening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125: 322-329.
12. Love C, Marwin SE, Tomas MB, et al: Diagnosing infection in the failed joint replacement: A comparison of coincidence detection 18F-FDG and 111In-labeled leukocyte/99mTc-sulfur colloid marrow imaging. J Nucl Med 2004;45: 1864-1871.
13. Huang AB, Schweitzer ME, Hume E, Batte WG: Osteomyelitis of the pelvis/hips in paralyzed patients: Accuracy and clinical utility of MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22: 437-443.
14. Lee SK, Suh KJ, Kim YW, et al: Septic arthritis versus transient synovitis at MR imaging: Preliminary assessment with signal intensity alterations in bone marrow. Radiology 1999;211: 459-465.