Optimum inspection planning for minimizing fatigue damage detection delay of ship hull structures

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 448-459

  Kim, Sunyong ^a   Frangopol, Dan M ^a  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage detection; Fatigue damage; Inspection planning; Probabilistic optimization; Ship structure

Indexed keywords

EXPECTED FATIGUE DAMAGE; INSPECTION PLANNING; INSPECTION PLANS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; OPTIMUM STRATEGY; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC OPTIMIZATION; SHIP HULL STRUCTURE; SHIP STRUCTURE;

FATIGUE DAMAGE; HULLS (SHIP); SEAWATER; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; SHIPBUILDING; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 78649316015     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. U.O. Akpan, T.S. Koko, B. Ayyub, and T.E. Dunbar Risk assessment of aging ship hull structures in the presence of corrosion and fatigue Marine Struct 15 3 2002 211 231 (Elsevier)
2. J.S. Arora Introduction to optimum design 2004 Elsevier London, UK
3. B.M. Ayyub, I.A. Assakkaf, D.P. Kihl, and M.W. Siev Reliability-based design guidelines for fatigue of ship structures Naval Eng J ASNE 114 2 2002 113 138
4. Berens AP, Hovey PW. Evaluation of NDE reliability characterization. AFWAL-TR-81-4160, vol. 1, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio; 1981.
5. H.-Y. Chung, L. Manuel, and K.H. Frank Optimal inspection scheduling of steel bridges using nondestructive testing techniques J Bridge Eng ASCE 11 3 2006 305 319
6. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE Trans Evolution Comput 6 2 2002 182 197
7. Dobson WG, Brodrick RF, Wheaton JW, Giannotti J, Stambaugh KA. Fatigue considerations in view of measured load spectra. SSC-315, Ship Structure Committee; 1983.
8. A. Fatemi, and L. Yang Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction theories: a survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials Int J Fatigue 20 1 1998 9 34 (Elsevier)
9. J.W. Fisher, G.L. Kulak, and I.F. Smith A fatigue primer for structural engineers 1998 National Steel Bridge Alliance
10. D.M. Frangopol, K.Y. Lin, and A.C. Estes Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures J Struct Eng ASCE 123 10 1997 1390 1401
11. D.M. Frangopol, and A.C. Estes Optimum lifetime planning of bridge inspection/repair programs Struct Eng Int J IABSE 9 3 1999 219 223
12. Y. Garbatov, and C.G. Soares Cost and reliability based strategies for fatigue maintenance planning of floating structures Reliab Eng Syst Safety 73 3 2001 293 301 (Elsevier)
13. Y.Y. Haimes, L.S. Lasdon, and D.A. Wismer On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 1 3 1971 296 297
14. B.-S. Huang, and H.-N. Chiu The quality management of the imperfect production process under two monitoring policies Int J Qual Reliab Manage 12 3 1995 19 31 Emerald
15. Irwin GR. The crack-extension-force for a crack at a free surface boundary. NRL report 5120; 1958.
16. Kim S, Frangopol DM. Inspection and monitoring planning for RC structures based on minimization of expected damage detection. Prob Eng Mech, Elsevier; in press. doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.08.009.
17. H.O. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N.C. Lind Methods of structural safety 1985 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
18. Madsen HO, Sørensen JD. Probability-based optimization of fatigue design, inspection and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on integrity of offshore structures, London, Elsevier; 1990. p. 421-32.
19. Madsen HO, Torhaug R, Cramer EH. Probability-based cost benefit analysis of fatigue design, inspection and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the marine structural inspection, maintenance and monitoring symposium, SSC/SNAME, Arlington, VA., II.E.1-12; 1991.
20. TM 4 User's Guide. The MathWorks, Inc., USA; 2009.
21. T. Moan Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures Struct Infrastruct Eng 1 1 2005 33 62 Taylor & Francis
22. J.R. Mohanty, B.B. Verma, and P.K. Ray Prediction of fatigue crack growth and residual life using an exponential model: part I (constant amplitude loading) Int J Fatigue 31 3 2009 418 424 (Elsevier)
23. Y. Mori, and B.R. Ellingwood Maintaining reliability of concrete structures. I: role of inspection/repair J Struct Eng ASCE 120 3 1994 824 845
24. P.F. Packman, H.S. Pearson, J.S. Owens, and G. Young Definition of fatigue cracks through nondestructive testing J Mater 4 3 1969 666 700
25. P.C. Paris, and F.A. Erdogan Critical analysis of crack propagation laws J Basic Eng TRANS ASME 85 Series D 1963 528 534
26. J. Schijve Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art Int J Fatigue 25 8 2003 679 702 (Elsevier)
27. C.G. Soares, and Y. Garbatov Fatigue reliability of the ship hull girder accounting for inspection and repair Reliab Eng Syst Safety 51 3 1996 341 351 (Elsevier)
28. C.G. Soares, and Y. Garbatov Fatigue reliability of the ship hull girder Mar Struct 9 3-4 1996 495 516 (Elsevier)
29. Frangopol DM. Life-cycle performance, management, and optimisation of structural systems under uncertainty: accomplishments and challenges. Struct Infrastruc Eng, Talyor & Francis; in press. doi: 10.1080/15732471003594427.