Numerical study of anomalous dynamic scaling behaviour of (1+1)-dimensional das Sarma Tamborenea model

Chinese Physics B

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2010, Pages

  Xun, Zhi Peng ^a   Tang, Gang ^a   Han, Kui ^a   Hao, Da Peng ^a   Xia, Hui ^a   Zhou, Wei ^a   Yang, Xi Quan ^a   Wen, Rong Ji ^a   Chen, Yu Ling ^a  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Anomalous dynamic scaling; Das Sarma Tamborenea model; Finite size effect; Noise reduction technique

Indexed keywords

ANOMALOUS SCALING; CROSSOVER EFFECTS; DAS SARMA-TAMBORENEA MODELS; DYNAMIC SCALING; FINITE SIZE EFFECT; GROWTH MODELS; LARGE LENGTH-SCALE; NOISE REDUCTION TECHNIQUE; NUMERICAL STUDIES; ROUGHNESS EXPONENT; SIMULATION RESULT; SYSTEM SIZE;

ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT; SIZE DETERMINATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 78649304351     PISSN: 16741056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/19/7/070516     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Family F and Vicsek T 1991 Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces (Singapore: World Scientific Press).
2. Barabási A L and Stanley H E 1995 Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress).
3. Halpin-Healy T and Zhang Y C 1995 Phys. Rep. 254 215.
4. Meakin P 1998 Fractals, Scaling and Growth Far from Equilibrium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Tang G and Ma B K 2002 Acta Phys. Sin. 51 0994 (in Chinese).
6. Hao D P, Tang G, Xia H, Chen H, Zhang L M and Xun Z P 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 2018 (in Chinese).
7. Family F and Vicsek T 1985 J. Phys. A 18 L75.
8. Edwards S F and Wilkinson D R 1982 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 381 17.
9. Kardar M, Parisi G and Zhang Y C 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 889.
10. López J M, Rodrguez M A and Cuerno R 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56 3993.
11. Amar J G, Lam P M and Family F 1993 Phys. Rev. E 47 3242.
12. Jeffries J H, Zuo J K and Craig M M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4931.
13. Yang H N, Wang G C and Lu T M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 2348.
14. López J M and Schmittbuhl J 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 6405.
15. Santamaria J, Gómez M E, Vicent J L, Krishnan K M and Schuller I K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 190601.
16. Huo S and Schwarzacher W 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 256.
17. Soriano J, Ramasco J J, Rodríguez A, Hernández-Machado H and Ortn J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 026102.
18. López J M, Rodrguez M A and Cuerno R 1997 Physica A 246 329.
19. Das Sarma S and Tamborenea P 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 325.
20. Krug J 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 2907.
21. Das Sarma S, Ghaisas S V and Kim J M 1994 Phys. Rev. E 49 122.
22. Huang Zhifeng and Gu Binglin 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 5935.
23. Predota M and Kotrla M 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 3933.
24. Chatraphorn P P and Das Sarma S 1998 Phys. Rev. E 57 R4863.
25. Das Sarma S, Chatraphorn P P and Toroczkai Z 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 036144.
26. Costa B S, Euzebio J A R and Aarao Reis F D A 2003Physica A 328 193.
27. Aarao Reis F D A 2004 Phys. Rev. E 70 031607.
28. Lai Z W and Das Sarma S 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 2348.
29. Villain J 1991 J. Phys. I 1 19.
30. Katzav E 2002 Phys. Rev. E 65 032103.
31. Tang C 1985 Phys. Rev. A 31 1977.
32. Szép J, Cserti J and Kertész J 1985 J. Phys. A 18 L413.
33. Kertész J and Vicsek T 1986 J. Phys. A 19 L257.
34. Wolf D E and Kertész J 1987 J. Phys. A 20 L257.
35. Kertész J and Wolf D E 1988 J. Phys. A 21 747.
36. López J M 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4594.
37. Xia H, Tang G, Han K, Hao D P, Chen H and Zhang L M 2006 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 30 1935.