Tuning cell adhesion on titanium with osteogenic rosette nanotubes

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95 A, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 550-563

  Zhang, Lijie ^a,b   Hemraz, Usha D ^c   Fenniri, Hicham ^c   Webster, Thomas J ^a,d  

^a Brown University   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

biomimetic; coating; nanomaterials; orthopedic implant; osteogenic peptides; rosette nanotubes

Indexed keywords

ARG GLY ASPS; BIOACTIVE COATINGS; BONE TISSUE; BONE-FORMING CELLS; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; FUNCTIONALIZED; NANO-TUBULAR STRUCTURE; NANOMATERIALS; ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT; OSTEOBLAST ADHESION; OSTEOGENIC; ROSETTE NANOTUBES; SELF-ASSEMBLED; SOFT TISSUE; VASCULARIZATION;

AMINO ACIDS; BIOMIMETICS; BONE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; COATED MATERIALS; COATINGS; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTUBES; PEPTIDES; SELF ASSEMBLY; TITANIUM;

ADHESION;

NANOTUBE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL STRUCTURE; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FETUS; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; OSTEOBLAST; ROSETTE FORMATION; VASCULARIZATION;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELLS, CULTURED; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NANOTUBES; OSTEOBLASTS; PEPTIDES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 78649291629     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32832     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). Available at:.
2. Zhang L, Sirivisoot S, Balasundaram G, Webster TJ,. Nanoengineering for bone tissue engineering. In:, Khademhosseini A, Borenstein J, Toner M, Takayama S, editors. Micro and Nanoengineering of the Cell Microenvironment: Technologies and Applications. Norwood: Artech House; 2008. p 431-460.
3. Fenniri H, Mathivanan P, Vidale KL, Sherman DM, Hallenga K, Wood KV, Stowell JG,. Helical rosette nanotubes: Design, self-assembly and characterization. J Am Chem Soc 2001; 123: 3854-3855.
4. Moralez JG, Raez J, Yamazaki T, Motkuri RK, Kovalenko A, Fenniri H,. Helical rosette nanotubes with tunable stability and hierarchy. J Am Chem Soc 2005; 127: 8307-8309.
5. Chun AL, Moralez JG, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Helical rosette nanotubes: A more effective orthopedic implant material. Nanotechnology 2004; 15: S234-S239.
6. Chun AL,. Helical Rosette Nanotubes: An Investigation Towards Its Application in Orthopedics, Ph.D. thesis. West Lafayette, IN: Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University; 2006.
7. Zhang L, Rakotondradany F, Myles AJ, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid modified rosette nanotube-hydrogel composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 1309-1320.
8. Zhang L, Rodriguez J, Raez J, Myles AJ, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Biologically inspired rosette nanotubes and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite hydrogel nanocomposites as improved bone substitutes. Nanotechnology 2009; 20: 17510.
9. Zhang L, Chen Y, Rodriguez J, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Biomimetic helical rosette nanotubes and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium for improving orthopedic implants. Int J Nanomed 2008; 3: 323-333.
10. Journeay WS, Suri SS, Moralez JG, Fenniri H, Singh B,. Rosette nanotubes show low acute pulmonary toxicity in vivo. Int J Nanomed 2008; 3: 373-383.
11. Dalton BA, McFarland CD, Underwood PA, Steele JG,. Role of the heparin-binding domain of fibronectin in attachment and spreading of human bone-derived cells. J Cell Sci 1995; 108: 2083-2092.
12. Nakamura H, Ozawa H,. Immunohistochemical localization of heparan sulfate proteoglycan in rat tibiae. J Bone Min Res 1994; 9: 1289-1299.
13. Puleo DA, Bizios R,. Mechanisms of fibronectin mediated attachment of osteoblasts to substrates in vitro. Bone Miner 1992; 18: 215-226.
14. Hasenbein ME, Andersen TT, Bizios R,. Micropatterned surfaces modified with select peptides promote exclusive interactions with osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2002; 19: 3937-3942.
15. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 291-301. (Pubitemid 32574927)
16. Nelson M, Balasundaram G, Webster TJ,. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanoparticulate crystalline hydroxyapatite functionalized with KRSR. Int J Nanomed 2006; 1: 339-349.
17. Dee KC, Andersen TT, Bizios R,. Design and function of novel osteoblast-adhesive peptides for chemical modification of biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 371-377.
18. Hemraz U, Fenniri H,. Rosette nanotubes: Factors affecting the self-assembly of the monobases versus the twin base system. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2008; 1057-1105-37.
19. Kaiser E, Colescott RL, Bossinger CD, Cook PI,. Color test for detection of free terminal amino groups in the solid-phase synthesis of peptides. Anal Biochem 1970; 24: 595-598.
20. Zhang L, Ramsaywack S, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on self-assembled nanostructured hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2008; 14: 1353-1364.
21. Carpino LA, Han GY,. The 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino-protecting group. J Org Chem 1972; 37: 3404-3409.
22. Atherton E, Fox H, Harkiss D, Logan CJ, Sheppard RC, Williams BJ,. A mild procedure for solid phase peptide synthesis: Use of fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1978: 537-539.
23. Merrifield RB,. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J Am Chem Soc 1963; 85: 2149-2154.
24. Webster TJ,. Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material. In:, Ying JY, editor. Advances in Chemical Engineering. New York: Academic Press; 2001. p 125-166.
25. Balasundaram G, Webster TJ,. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined Ti modified with KRSR. J Biomed Mater Res 2007; 80A: 602-611.
26. Fine E, Zhang L, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Enhanced endothelial cell functions on rosette nanotubes coated titanium vascular stents. Int J Nanomed 2009; 4: 91-97.
27. Zhang L, Webster TJ,. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: Promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nanotoday 2009; 4: 66-80.
28. Choudhary S, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ,. Enhanced functions of vascular cells on nanostructured Ti for improved stent applications. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 1421-1430.
29. Wang GX, Deng XY, Tang CJ, Liu LS, Xiao L, Xiang LH, Quan XJ, Legrand AP, Guidoin R,. The adhesive properties of endothelial cells on endovascular stent coated by substrates of poly-l-lysine and fibronectin. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2006; 34: 11-25.
30. Elmengaard B, Bechtold JE, Soballe K,. In vivo study of the effect of RGD treatment on bone ongrowth on press-fit titanium alloy implants. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 3521-3526.
31. Chua PH, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Wang W,. Surface functionalization of titanium with hyaluronic acid/chitosan polyelectrolyte multilayers and RGD for promoting osteoblast functions and inhibiting bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1412-1421.
32. Schussler O, Coirault C, Louis-Tisserand M, Al-Chare W, Oliviero P, Menard C, Michelot R, Bochet P, Salomon DR, Chachques JC, Carpentier A, Lecarpentier Y,. Use of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid adhesion peptides coupled with a new collagen scaffold to engineer a myocardium-like tissue graft. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2009; 6: 240-249.