Analysis of SWAT 2005 Parameter Sensitivity with LH-OAT Method

HKIE Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1-7

  Qiang, Chen ^a   Si, Gou ^a   Dayong, Qin ^a   Zuhao, Zhou ^a  

^a CHINA INSTITUTE OF WATER RESOURCES AND HYDROPOWER RESEARCH   (China)

Author keywords

LH OAT; Number of Intervals; Parameter Bound; Random Seed; Sensitivity Analysis; Varying Method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; SEED;

LH-OAT; NUMBER OF INTERVALS; PARAMETER BOUND; RANDOM SEEDS; VARYING METHOD;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 78649269583     PISSN: 1023697X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1023697X.2010.10668197     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., Williams, J.R., Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I:model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association. Volume 34, No 4, pp73–89. AWRA. USA (1998).
2. Arnold, J.G., Muttiah, R.S., Srinivasan, R., Allen, P.M., Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the upper Mississippi basin. Journal of Hydrology. Volume 227, No 1–4, pp21–40. Elsevier. Netherlands (2000).
3. Arnold, J.G., Fohrer, N., SWAT 2000:Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrological Processes. Volume 19, No 3, pp563–572. Wiley Inter Sciences. USA (2000).
4. Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H., The Soil and Water Assessment Toll:Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Direction. Transactions of the ASABE. Volume 50, No 4, pp1211–1250. ASABE. USA (2007).
5. Holvoet, K., van Griensven, A., Seuntjens, P., Vanrolleghem, P.A., Hydrodynamic modelling with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for predicting dynamic behaviour of pesticides. 2nd Young Researchers Conference, University of Wageningen. pp211–218. Netherlands. 23–24 April (2004).
6. Iman, R.L., Conover, W.J., Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics:Theory and Methods. Volume A9, No 17, pp1749–1842. Taylor & Francis. USA (1980).
7. Kannan, N., Whiteb, S.M., Worrallc, F., Whelan, M.J., Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT 2000. Journal of Hydrology. Volume 332, No 3–4, pp456–466. Elsevier. Netherlands (2007).
8. Lenhart, T., Eckhardt, K., Fohrer, N., Frede, H. G., Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys Chem Earth. Volume 27, No 9–10, pp645–654. Elsevier. Netherlands (2002).
9. Lauritzen, S.L., Some modern applications of graphical models. In Highly structured stochastic systems. pp13–28. P.J. Green, S. Richardson, N.L. Hjort, eds. Oxford:Oxford University Press. (2003).
10. McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., Conover, W.J., A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. Volume 21, No 2, pp239–245. American Statistical Association and American Society for Quality Control. USA (1979).
11. McKay, M.D., In:Ronen, Y. (Ed), Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Using a Statistical Sample of Input Values. pp145–186. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (1988).
12. Morris, M.D., Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics. Volume 33, No 2, pp161–174. American Statistical Association and American Society for Quality Control. USA (1991).
13. Remegio, B. C. Jr., Gerald, W., Sensitivity Analysis and Interdependence of The SWAT Model Parameters. ASABE Annual International Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 17–20 June 2007, 072101. (2007).
14. SANG, X.F., ZHOU, Z.H., QIN, D.Y., WEI, H.B., Application of improved SWAT model to area with strong human activities. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. Volume 39, No 12, pp1377–1383. China Association of Hydraulic Engineering. China (2008).
15. Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D. Saisana, M., Tarantola, S., Global Sensitivity Analysis (The Primer). Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Italy. Retrieved 30 June, 2009 from http://sensitivityanalysis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
16. Spruill, C.A., Workman, S.R., Taraba, J.L., Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model. Trans ASAE. Volume 43, No 6, pp1431–1439. ASAE. USA (2000).
17. van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., Srinivasan, R., A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrology. Volume 324, No 1–4, pp10–23. Elsevier. Netherlands (2006).
18. van Griensven, A., Sensitivity, auto-calibration, uncertainty and model evaluation in SWAT 2005 (Draft). Virtual Reality Applications Centre of Iowa State University. USA. Retrieved 15 April, 2009 from http://gis-vrac.vrac.iastate.edu/icrw/download/