Sensitivity analysis and interdependence of the SWAT model parameters

2007 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Technical Papers

Volumn 3 BOOK, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Confesor Jr , Remegio B ^a   Whittaker, Gerald ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic calibration; Bayesian network; Genetic algorithm; Pareto; Sensitivity; SWAT

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL (SWAT);

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CALIBRATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

HYDROLOGY;

EID: 35748934160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Arnold, J.G. and P.M. Allen. 1999. Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(2): 411-424.
2. Arnold, J.G., P.M. Allen, R. Muttiah, and G Bernhardt. 1995. Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water 33(6): 1010-1018.
3. Arnold, J.G, R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89.
4. Beven, K. and Freer, J., 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology 249(1-4): 11-29.
5. Borsuk, M.E., P. Reichert, A. Peter, E. Schager, and P. Burkhardt-Holm. 2006. Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network. Ecological Modelling 192(1-2): 224-244.
6. Boøttcher, S.G. 2001. Learning Bayesian networks with mixed variables. In Proc. of Eighth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 149-156. T. Jaakkola and T. Richardson, eds. Key West, Florida: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
7. Boøttcher, S.G and C. Dethlefsen. 2003. Deal: A package for learning bayesian networks. Journal of Statistical Software 8(20): 1-40.
8. Boyle, D.P., H.V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, V. Koren, Z. Zhang, M. Smith. 2001. Toward Improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling. Water Resources Research 37(11): 2749-2759.
9. Confesor, R.B. Jr. and G.W. Whittaker. 2007. Automatic calibration of hydrologie models with multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and pareto optimization. Accepted, Journal of the American Water Resources Association.
10. Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T Meyarivan. 2002. A fast and elitist multlobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2): 182-197.
11. Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J.G. and Neitsch, S.L., 2002. ArcView Interface for SWAT2000, User's Guide.
12. Eckhardt, K. and Arnold, J.G., 2001. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. Journal of Hydrology 251(1-2): 103-109.
13. Feyen, L., J.A. Vrugt, B.Ó. Nualláin, J. Knijff, and A. De Roo. 2006. Parameter optimisation and uncertainty assessment for large-scale streamflow simulation with the LISFLOOD model. Journal of Hydrology 332(3-4): 276-289.
14. Ho, C.M., R.A. Cropp, and R.D. Braddock. 2005. On the sensitivity analysis of two hydrologie models. In Proc. MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2491-2497. A. Zerger and R.M. Argent, eds. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. Available at htttp://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/ papers/ho_cm.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2007.
15. Lauritzen, S.L., 2003. Some modern applications of graphical models. In Highly structured stochastic systems, 13-28. P.J. Green, S. Richardson, and N.L. Hjort, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Loague, K.M. And Freeze, R.A. 1985. A comparison of rainfall runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments. Water Resources Research 21(2): 229-248.
17. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models-part I: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282-290.
18. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, R. Srinivasan, J.R. Williams. 2002. Soil and water assessment tool user's manual: Version 2000. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Temple, Texas. Available at http://www.brc.tamus.edu/ swat/downloads/doc/ swatuserman.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2007.
19. Tarantola, S. and A. Saltelli. 2003. SAMO 2001 : Methodological advances and Innovative applications of sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 79(2): 121-122.
20. Jasper A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, S. C. Dekker, S. Sorooshian, T. Wagener and W. Bouten. 2006. Application of stochastic parameter optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model. Journal of Hydrology 325(1-4): 288-307.
21. Van Liew, M. W., J. G. Arnold, and D. D. Bosch. 2005. Problems and potential of autocalibrating a hydrological model. Transactions of the ASAE 48(3): 1025-1040.