Classification effects of real and imaginary movement selective attention tasks on a P300-based brain-computer interface

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Salvaris, Mathew ^a   Sepulveda, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIALS; FISHER'S LINEAR DISCRIMINANT; IMAGINARY MOVEMENTS; MU RHYTHM; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TRIAL CLASSIFICATION;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BETA RHYTHM; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; IMAGINATION; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649262122     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Wolpaw J R, Birbaumer N, McFarland D J, Pfurtscheller G and Vaughan T M 2002 Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 767-91 (Pubitemid 34621187)
2. Blankertz B et al 2004 The BCI competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51 1044-51
3. Blankertz B, Müller K, Krusienski D J, Schalk G, Wolpaw J R, Schlögl A, Pfurtscheller G, Millán J, Schröder M and Birbaumer N 2006 The BCI competition: III. Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14 153-9
4. Farwell L A and Donchin E 1988 Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 510-23
5. Vaughan T M, McFarland D J, Schalk G, Sarnacki W A, Krusienski D J, Sellers E W and Wolpaw J R 2006 The Wadsworth BCI Research and Development Program: at home with BCI IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14 229-33
6. Polich J 2004 Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 15 133-61
7. Polich J 2007 Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 2128-48 (Pubitemid 47385341)
8. Smith J L, Johnstone S J and Barry R J 2008 Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition Clin. Neurophysiol. 119 704-14
9. Pfefferbaum A, Ford J M, Weller B J and Kopell B S 1985 ERPs to response production and inhibition Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60 423-34
10. Starr A, Sandroni P and Michalewski H J 1995 Readiness to respond in a target detection task: pre- and post-stimulus event-related potentials in normal subjects Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 76-92
11. Polich J 1987 Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli Biol. Psychol. 25 61-71 (Pubitemid 18064945)
12. Barrett G, Neshige R and Shibasaki H 1987 Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 66 409-19
13. Salisbury D F, Rutherford B, Shenton M E and McCarley R W 2001 Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 1676-84 (Pubitemid 32763251)
14. Salisbury D F, Griggs C B, Shenton M E and McCarley R W 2004 The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 1550-8
15. Burle B, Vidal F and Bonnet M 2004 Electroencephalographic nogo potentials in a no-movement context: the case of motor imagery in humans Neurosci. Lett. 360 77-80 (Pubitemid 38471992)
16. Nakata H, Inui K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Sakamoto M, Kida T, Wasaka T and Kakigi R 2004 Effects of a Go/NoGo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 361-8 (Pubitemid 38117257)
17. Bruin K J and Wijers A A 2002 Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study Clin. Neurophysiol. 113 1172-82
18. Donchin E and Coles M 1988 Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 11 357-74
19. Polich J 1990 P300, probability, and interstimulus interval Psychophysiology 27 396-403
20. Johnson R and Donchin E 1982 Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach Psychophysiology 19 183-200
21. Duncan-Johnson C C and Donchin E 1977 On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability Psychophysiology 14 456-67
22. Polich J, Brock T and Geisler M W 1991 P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval Int. J. Psychophysiol. 11 219-23
23. Woods D L and Courchesne E 1986 The recovery functions of auditory event-related potentials during split-second discriminations Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65 304-15
24. Gonsalvez C J, Gordon E, Grayson S, Barry R J, Lazzaro I and Bahramali H 1999 Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? Psychophysiology 36 643-54
25. Gonsalvez C L and Polich J 2002 P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval Psychophysiology 39 388-96
26. Gonsalvez C J, Barry R J, Rushby J A and Polich J 2007 Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task Psychophysiology 44 245-50
27. Citi L, Poli R, Cinel C and Sepulveda F 2008 P300-based BCI mouse with genetically optimized analogue control IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 16 51-61
28. Krusienski D J, Sellers E W, Cabestaing F, Bayoudh S, McFarland D J, Vaughan T M and Wolpaw J R 2006 A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 speller J. Neural Eng. 3 299-305
29. Lotte F, Congedo M, Lcuyer A, Lamarche F and Arnaldi B 2007 A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces J. Neural Eng. 4 R1-R13 (Pubitemid 46603810)
30. Bashashati A, Fatourechi M, Ward R K and Birch G E 2007 A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals J. Neural Eng. 4 R32-57 (Pubitemid 46603812)
31. Duda R O, Hart P E and Stork D G 2001 Pattern Classification 2nd edn (New York: Wiley)
32. Franc V and Hlavac V 2004 Statistical pattern recognition toolbox for Matlab Research Report 2004.08 Center for Machine Perception, K13133 FEE Czech Technical University Prague, Czech Republic
33. Glassman E L 2005 A wavelet-like filter based on neuron action potentials for analysis of human scalp electroencephalographs IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 1851-62
34. Guyon I and Elisseeff A 2003 An introduction to variable and feature selection J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 1157-82
35. Raymond J E, Shapiro K L and Arnell K M 1992 Temporary suppression of visual processing in a RVSP task: an attentional blink? J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 18 849-60
36. Kanwisher N G 1987 Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation Cognition 27 117-43
37. Cinel C, Poli R and Citi C 2004 Possible sources of perceptual errors in P300-based speller paradigm Proc. 2nd Int. Brain-Computer Interface Workshop and Training Course (Graz)
38. Isreal J, Chesney G L, Wickens C and Donchin E 1980 P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance Psychophysiology 17 259-73
39. Friedrich E V, McFarland D J, Neuper C, Vaughan T M, Brunner P and Wolpaw J R 2009 A scanning protocol for a sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface Biol. Psychol. 80 169-75