Interaction between patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetes nurse specialists during annual check-ups: A study using video recordings

Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Edwall, L L ^a   Danielson, E ^a   Smide, B ^b   Ohrn I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Communication; Physical examination; Type 2 diabetes; Video recorded

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649239185     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15236064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. U. K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38: Brit Med J; 1998; 317: 703-713.
2. Leppänen V. Structures of District Nurse-Patient Interaction. [Dissertation], Lund: Dept. of Sociology, Lund University, 1998.
3. Drew P, Heritage J. Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In: Drew P, Heritage J. (eds.) Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992: 3-66.
4. Holmstrom I, Rosenquist U. Misunderstandings about illness and treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes: J Adv Nurs; 2005; 49: 146-154.
5. Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E et al.: Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med; 2007; 24: 48-54.
6. Zoffmann V, Harder I, Kirkevold M: A Person-centered communication and reflection model: sharing decision-making in chronic care. Qual Health Res; 2008; 18: 670-685.
7. Hornsten A, Lundman B, Selstam EK, Sandstrom H: Patient satisfaction with diabetes care. J Adv Nurs; 2005; 51: 609-617.
8. Health Consumer Powerhouse. Diabetes Index 2006 en jämförelse mellan landstingens diabetesvård. Available at: http://www.healthpowerhouse.com/archives/Diabetesrapport2006.pdf, accessed on February 2009.
9. Gudbjörnsdottir S: Nationella diabetesregistret, NDR, Årsrapport 2007 års resultat [National Diabetes Register, NDR, Annual report 2007 results]. Diabetolog Nytt 2008; 5-129.
10. Bryant W, Greenfield JR, Chisholm DJ, Campbell LV: Diabetes guidelines: easier to preach than to practise? A retrospective audit of outpatient management of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med J Australia; 2006; 185: 305-309.
11. Zoffman V, Kirkewold M: Life versus disease in difficult diabetes care: conflicting perspectives disempower patients and professionals in problem solving. Qual Health Res; 2005; 15: 750-765.
12. Weijman I, Ros WJG, Rutten GEHM, Schaufeli WB, Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM: Frequency and perceived burden of diabetes self-management activities in employees with insulin-treated diabetes: relationships with health outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pr; 2005; 68: 56-64.
13. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Skovlund SE: Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabetic Med; 2005; 22: 1379-1385.
14. Williams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci ER: Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care; 1998; 21: 1644-1651.
15. Ten Have P. Doing Conversation Analysis A practical Guide. Second ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007.
16. Drew P, Chatwin J, Collins S: Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care. Health Expectations; 2001; 4: 58-70.
17. Melander H, Sahlström F:In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. J Pragmatics 2009; 41: 1519-1537.
18. Socialstyrelsen: Nationella riktlinjer för diabetesvården 2010 - Stöd för styrning och ledning [The National Board of Health and Welfare: National guidelines for diabetes care in 2010 - support for governance and management]. Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/halso-ochsjukvard/sjukdomar/endokrinasjukdomar/diabetes, accessed on May 2010
19. Gudbjornsdottir S, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, Eliasson B: The National Diabetes Register in Sweden: An implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration for quality improvement in diabetes care. Diabetes Care; 2003; 26: 1270-1276.
20. Socialstyrelsen. Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter om ändring i föreskrifterna och allmänna råden (SOSFS 2000:1) om läkemedelshantering i hälso- och sjukvården (Omtryck) [Social Board regulations amending the regulations and general advice (SOSFS 2000:1) on pharmaceutical management in Health Care, reprinted]. Available at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/sosfs/2000-1, accessed on May 2009
21. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Third ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2002.
22. The DCCT Research group: The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes; 1995: 968-983.
23. Edwall L-L, Hellstrom A-L, Ohrn I, Danielson E: The lived experience of the diabetes nurse specialist at regular check-ups, as narrated by patients with Type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 772-781.
24. Gafaranga J, Britten N. Talking an institution into being: the opening sequence in general practice consultations. In: Richards K, Seedhouse P.(eds.) Applying Conversation Analysis. Hampshire: Palegrave macmillan, 2007: 75-90.
25. Jordan B, Henderson A. Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. J Learn Sci; 1995; 4: 39-103.
26. Duranti A, Goodwin C. Rethinking context: an introduction In: Goodwin C, Duranti A. (eds.) Rethinking Context Language as an interactive phenomenon. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 1-43.
27. Transana [Win] Transcription and analysis of audio and video data. Presentation downloads and bulletin boards: Available at: http://www.transana.org/, accessed May 2009
28. Bergstrand M. Hälsorådgivande samtal: kommunikativa strategier i samspel mellan distriktssköterska och patient [Health advisory talk: communicative strategies in interaction between district nurse and patient]. [Dissertation]. Stockholm; Stockholm Pedagogiska Institutionen, 2000.
29. Karhila P, Kettunen T, Poskiparta M, Liimatainen L: Negotiation in Type 2 diabetes counseling: from problem recognition to mutual acceptance during lifestyle counseling. Qual Health Res; 2003; 13: 1205-1224.
30. Heath C. Body work: the collaborative production of the clinical object. In: Heritage J, Maynard DW. (eds.) Communication in Medical Care interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006:185-214.
31. Pollock RD, Unwin NC, Connolly V: Knowledge and practice of foot care in people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pr; 2004; 64: 117-122.
32. Heath C. The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation In: Drew P, Heritage J. (eds.) Talk at work Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992: 235-267.
33. Peräkylä A. Communication and responding to diagnosis. In: Heritage J, Maynard DW. (eds.) Communication in Medical Care interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 214-247.
34. Attvall S. Nationella riktlinjer för diabetesvården-beslutsstöd för prioriteringar preliminär version [National guidelines for diabetes care: a preliminary version]. Sweden: Liporapid Media AB, 2009.
35. Pillet-Shore D: Weighing in primary-care nurse-patient interactions. Soc Sci Med; 2006; 62: 407-421.
36. Bergstrand M. Hälsorådgivande samtal [Health advisory talks] Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2004.
37. Jones A: Nurses talking to patients: exploring conversation analysis as a means of researching nurse-patient communication. Int J Nurs Stud; 2003; 40: 609-618.
38. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Third ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006.