Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity

Creativity and Innovation Management

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 315-325

  Magadley, Wissam ^a   Birdi, Kamal ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649236656     PISSN: 09631690     EISSN: 14678691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00540.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Amabile, T.M., (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Amabile, T.M., (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 10, 123-67.
3. Anderson, N.R., and West, M.A., (1998) Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 19, 235-58.
4. Bauer, W., (2004) Innovations in Office Design as a Strategy for Survival. InSpath, D. and Kern, P. (eds.), Office 21®- Push for the Future. Better Performance in Innovative Working Environments. Egmont Vgs, Cologne/Stuttgart, 6-11.
5. Birdi, S.K., (2005) No idea? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Creativity Training. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 102-11.
6. Bryman, A., and Bell, E., (2003) Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Clapham, M.M., (1997) Ideational Skills Training: A Key Element in Creativity Training Programs. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 33-44.
8. Crabtree, B.F., and Miller, W.L., (1992) A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebooks. InCrabtree, B.F. and Miller, W.L. (eds.), Doing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 93-109.
9. Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S., (1993) Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-7.
10. Eisenberger, R., and Shanock, L., (2003) Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: A Case Study of Conceptual and Methodological Isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121-30.
11. Graham, W.K., (1977) Accepting of Ideas Generated Through Individual and Group Brainstorming. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 231-4.
12. Hammersley, M., (1996) The Relationship Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Paradigm Loyalty Versus Methodological Eclecticism. InRichardson, J.T.E. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. BPS Books, Leicester, 159-74.
13. Holahan, C.J., (1982) Environmental Psychology. Random House, Inc., New York.
14. Johnson, R.B., and Onwuegbuzie, A.J., (2004) Mixed Methods Approach: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
15. Kasof, J., (1997) Creativity and Breadth of Attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 303-16.
16. Kristensen, T., (2004) The Physical Context of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 89-96.
17. Lewis, M., and Moultrie, J., (2005) The Organisational Innovation Laboratory. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 73-83.
18. Mintzberg, H., (1990) The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Fact. Harvard Business Review, 68, 163-76.
19. Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U., Janssen, S., and Van der Lugt, R., (2007) ‘Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 53-65.
20. Mumford, M.D., Scott, G.M., Gaddis, B., and Strange, J.M., (2002) Leading Creative People: Orchestrating Expertise and Relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-50.
21. Nijstad, B.A., Stroebe, W., and Lodewijkx, H.F., (2002) Cognitive Stimulation and Interference in Groups: Exposure Effects in an Idea Generation Task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535-44.
22. Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., and George, J.F., (1991) Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 40-61.
23. Offner, A.K., Kramer, T.J., and Winter, J.P., (1996) The Effects of Facilitation, Recording, and Pauses on Group Brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 283-98.
24. Osborn, A.F., (1957) Applied Imagination, rev. edn. Scribner’s, New York.
25. Paulus, P.B., Dzindolet, M.T., Poletes, G., and Camacho, L.M., (1993) Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
26. Prajogo, D.I., and Ahmed, P.K., (2006) Relationships Between Innovation Stimulus, Innovation Capacity, and Innovation Performance. R & D Management, 36, 499-515.
27. Rickards, T., (1999) Brainstorming Revisited: A Question of Context. International Journal of Management Research, 1, 91-110.
28. Schwarz, R.M., (1994) The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
29. Sutton, R.I., and Hargadon, A., (1996) Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in Product Design Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
30. Thomas, A.R., and Ayres, J., (1998) A Principal’s Interruptions: Time Lost or Time Gained? International Journal of Educational Management, 12, 244-9.
31. Utterback, J.M., (1971) The Process of Innovation: A Study of the Origination and Development of Ideas for New Scientific Instruments. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 18, 124-31.
32. West, M.A., (2002) Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-424.
33. Wolfe, R.A., (1994) Organisational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 405-31.