Task-Selection bias: A case for user-defined tasks

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 411-419

  Cordes, Richard E ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRODUCT DESIGN; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES; PRACTICAL ISSUES; PRODUCT EVALUATION; PRODUCT USABILITY; TASK SELECTION; USABILITY EVALUATION;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 18244379599     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_04     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cordes, R. E. (1984). Application of magnitude estimation for evaluating software ease-of-use. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), First USA-Japan Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 199-202). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Cordes, R. E. (1989). Are software usability tests biased in favor of your product? Proceedings of the 28th ACM. Annual Technical Symposium (pp. 1-4). Gaithersburg, MD: ACM.
3. Cordes, R. E. (1992). Bias in usability studies: Is this stuff science? HFS Test and Evaluation Newsletter, 7(2), 2-5.
4. Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1993). A practical guide to usability testing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Molich, R., Bevan, N., Butler, S., Curson, I., Kindlund, E., Kirakowski, J., & Miller, D. (1998). Comparative evaluation of usability test. In Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association 1998 Conference (pp. 189-200). Washington, DC: UPA.
6. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston: Academic.
7. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 27, 776-783.
8. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York: Wiley.