Bayesian analysis of dyadic data

American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 73-92

  Gill, Paramjit S ^a   Swartz, Tim B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Incomplete data; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Missing data; Social relations model; WinBUGS

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COVARIANCE MATRIX; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; INCOMPLETE DATA; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; MISSING DATA; SOCIAL RELATIONS MODELS; WINBUGS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 34848928100     PISSN: 01966324     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01966324.2007.10737689     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Curry, T. J. & Emerson, R. M. (1970). Balance theory: a theory of interpersonal attraction. Sociometry, 33, 216-238.
2. Dey, D.K., Gelfand, A.E., Swartz, T.B. & Vlachos, P.K. (1998). Simulation based model checking for hierarchical models. Test, 7, 325-346.
3. Gelfand, A. E., Hills, S. E., Racine-Poon, A. & Smith, A. F. M. (1990). Illustration of Bayesian inference in normal data models using Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 972-985.
4. Gerlsma, C. (1993). Parental rearing styles and psychology: Memories of parenting revisited. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
5. Gerlsma, C., Snijders, T. A. B., Van Duijn, M. A. J. & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1997). Parenting and psychopathology: Differences in family member’s perception of parental rearing styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 271-282.
6. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (editors) (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice.London: Chapman & Hall.
7. Gill, P. S. & Swartz, T. B. (2001). Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data. The Canadian Journal of Statistics,29, 321-331.
8. Gill, P. S. & Swartz, T. B. (2004). Bayesian analysis of directed graphs data with applications to social networks. Applied Statistics: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C,53, 249-260.
9. Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., Draper, D., Browne, W., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G. & Healy, M. (1998). A user’s guide to Mlwin. London: Institute of Education.
10. Hoff, P. D. (2005). Bilinear mixed effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association,100, 286-295.
11. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Kenny, D. A. & Voie, L. La (1982). Reciprocity of interpersonal attraction: a confirmed hypothesis, Social Psychology Quarterly,45, 54-58.
13. Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D. & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin,127, 128-141.
14. Laud, P. W. & Ibrahim, J. G. (1995). Predictive model selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B,57, 247-262.
15. Lev, J. & Kinder, E. (1957). New analysis of variance formulas for treating data from mutually paired subjects. Psychometrika,22, 1-15.
16. Li, H. & Loken, E. (2002). A unified theory of statistical analysis and inference for variance component models for dyadic data. Statistica Sinica, 12, 519-535.
17. Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. Newcomb, T. M. (1979). Reciprocity of interpersonal attraction: a nonconfirmation of a plausible hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly,42, 299-306.
19. Snijders, T. A. B. & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: a multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 471-486.
20. Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A. & Best, N. (2003). WinBUGS (Version 1.4) user manual.Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit.
21. Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A. & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 1742-1757.
22. Wong, G. Y. (1982). Round robin analysis of variance via maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77,714-724.