Invasive species management in a spatially heterogeneous world: Effects of uniform policies

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 483-499

  Albers, Heidi J ^a   Fischer, Carolyn ^b   Sanchirico, James N ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioeconomic modeling; Economic ecological modeling; Ecosystem services; Metapopulation; Optimal control

Indexed keywords

BIO-ECONOMIC MODEL; BIOECONOMIC; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS; HETEROGENEOUS REGION; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT; METAPOPULATIONS; OPTIMAL CONTROLS; POLICY CONSTRAINTS; SPACE AND TIME; SPATIAL PROCESS;

CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; HETEROGENEITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; METAPOPULATION; OPTIMIZATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

EID: 78549248455     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albers H.J. Modeling ecological constraints on tropical forest management: spatial interdependence, irreversibility and uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1996, 30:73-94.
2. Alston J.M., James J.S. The incidence of agricultural policy. Handbook of Agricultural Economics 2002, vol. 2:1689-1749. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
3. APHIS (USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), 2009. Plant Health. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/.
4. Brown C., Lynch L., Zilberman D. The economics of controlling insect-transmitted plant diseases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84(2):279-291.
5. Carter, C.A., Chalfant, J.A., Goodhue, R.E., Zalom, F., McKee, G., 2006. Biology and economics of invasive species: spatial and temporal interactions. Presented at the Workshop on the Program of Research on the Economics of Invasive Species Management (PREISM). Washington, DC, October. http://www.farmfoundation.org/projects/documents/Goodhue.pdf.
6. Cohen A.N., Carlton J.T. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 1998, 279(5350):555-558.
7. Costello C., McAusland C., Springborn M., Solow A. Unintended biological invasions: does risk vary by trading partner?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2007, 54(3):262-276.
8. Cumming G.S. Habitat shape, species invasions, and reserve design: insights from simple models. Conservation Ecology 2002, 6(1):3. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art3.
9. Doescher, P., 2008. Personal communication. Oregon State University, Forest Ecosystems and Society Department.
10. Eiswerth M.E., Johnson W.S. Managing nonindigenous invasive species: insights from dynamic analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics 2002, 23(3):319-342.
11. Enserink M. Predicting invasions: biological invaders sweep in. Science 1999, 285(5435):1834-1836.
12. Gersovitz M. Transportation, state marketing, and the taxation of the agricultural hinterland. Journal of Political Economy 1989, 97(5):1113-1137.
13. Gordon D. Effects of invasive, nonindigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecological Applications 1998, 8(4):975-989.
14. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. R. May, P. Harvey (Eds.).
15. Hof J. Optimizing spatial and dynamic population-based control strategies for invading forest pests. Natural Resource Modeling 1998, 11(3):197-216.
16. Horan R., Perrings C., Lupi F., Bulte E. Biological pollution prevention strategies under ignorance: the case of invasive species. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84(5):1303-1310.
17. Horan R., Wolf C.A., Fenichel E.P., Mathews K.H. Spatial management of wildlife disease. Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 27(3):483-490.
18. Huenneke L.F., Hamburg S.P., Koide R., Mooney H.A., Vitousek P.M. Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Science 1990, 71(2):478-491.
19. Leung B., Lodge D.M., Finnoff D., Shogren J., Lewis M.A., Lamberti G. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 2002, 269:2407-2413.
20. Mehta S.V., Haight R.G., Homans F.R., Polasky S., Venette R.C. Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecological Economics 2007, 61:237-245.
21. Muller J., Albers H.J. Enforcement, payments, and development projects near protected areas: how the market setting determines what works where. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26:185-204.
22. NPIC (National Pesticide Information Center), 2009. http://npic.orst.edu/state1.htm.
23. Olson L.J., Roy S. The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2002, 84(5):1311-1316.
24. Olson L.J., Roy S. On prevention and control of an uncertain biological invasion. Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 27(3):491-497.
25. Robinson E.J.Z., Williams J.C., Albers H.J. The impact of markets and policy on spatial patterns of nontimber forest product extraction. Land Economics 2002, 77(2):260-271.
26. Sanchirico, J.N., 2002. Additivity Properties in Metapopulation Models: Implications for the Assessment of Marine Reserves. Discussion paper 02-26 (Dec.). Resources for the Future. Washington, DC.
27. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999, 37:129-150.
28. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. A bioeconomic model of marine reserve creation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2001, 42:257-276.
29. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. Dynamics of spatial exploitation: a metapopulation approach. Natural Resource Modeling 2001, 14(3):391-418.
30. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. The impacts of marine reserves on limited-entry Fisheries. Natural Resource Modeling 2002, 15(3):291-310.
31. Sanchirico J.N., Wilen J.E. Optimal spatial management of renewable resources: matching policy scope to ecosystem scale. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2005, 50:23-46.
32. Sanchirico, J.M., Albers, H.J., Fischer, C., Coleman, C., 2008. Spatial Management of Invasive Species: Pathways and Policy Options. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 08-20. Washington, DC.
33. Sharov A.A. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Risk Analysis 2004, 24:879-892.
34. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecological Applications 1998, 8(3):833-845.
35. Sharov A.A., Liebhold A. Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications 1998, 8(4):1170-1179.
36. Skonhoft A., Olaussen J.O. Managing a migratory species that is both a value and pest. Land Economics 2005, 81:34-50.
37. Tamarisk Coalition Riparian Restoration: Assessment of Alternative Technologies for Tamarisk Control, Biomass Reduction and Revegetation 2008, Colorado Water Conservation Board. http://www.tamariskcoalition.org/tamariskcoalition/PDF/Assessment%2520of%2520Alternative%2520Technologies%2520General%25207-14-2008%2520(FINAL).pdf.
38. Wainger, L., King, D.M., 2006. Choosing efficient treatment options by assessing costs and benefits in a spatial risk-based optimization framework. Presented at the Workshop on the Program of Research on the Economics of Invasive Species Management (PREISM). Washington, DC, October. http://www.farmfoundation.org/projects/documents/WaingerKingPREISM2006Send.pdf.