Digital culture collections in an age of reuse and remixes

First Monday

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Eschenfelder, Kristin R ^a   Caswell, Michelle ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78449266588     PISSN: 13960466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Dharma Akmon, 2010. "Only with your permission: How rights holders respond (or don't respond) to requests to display archival materials online," Archival Science, volume 10, number 1, pp. 45-64.
2. Nancy Allen, 2009. Art museum images in scholarly publishing, Houston: Rice University Press.
3. Jodi L. Allison-Bunnell, 1995. "Access in the time of Salinger: Fair use and the papers of Katherine Anne Porter," American Archivist, volume 58, number 3, pp. 270-282.
4. American Association of Museums, 2000. "Code of ethics for museums," at http://www.aamus.org/museumresources/ethics/coe.cfm, accessed 1 January 2010.
5. American Association of Museums. Registrars Committee, 2004. AAM member museums rights and reproductions survey 2004. Washington D.C.: American Association of Museums.
6. American Library Association and the Society of American Archivists, 2009. "Joint statement on access: Guidelines for access to original research materials" (revised August), at http://www.archivists.org/statements/alasaa.asp, accessed 16 December 2009.
7. Katherine Becvar and Ramesh Srinivasan, 2009. "Indigenous knowledge and culturally responsive methods in information research," Library Quarterly, volume 79, number 4, pp. 421-441.
8. Susan M. Bielstein, 2006. Permissions, a survival guide: Blunt talk about art as intellectual property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Frank Boles, 2005. Selecting and appraising archives and manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
10. Kathy Bowrey and Jane Anderson, 2009. "The politics of global information sharing: Whose cultural agendas are being advanced?" Social and Legal Studies, volume 18, number 4, pp. 479-504.
11. Paula Bray, 2009. "Flickr commons: Open licensing and the future of collections," In: Jennifer Trant and David Bearman (editors). Archives & Museum Informatics: Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2009 (Indianapolis, 15-18 April), at http://www.archimuse.com/mw2009/abstracts/prg_335001933.html, accessed 26 October 2010.
12. Michael F. Brown, 2003. Who owns native culture? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
13. H. Burkert, 2008. "New information and communication technologies, traditional cultural expressions and intellectual property lawmaking - a polemic comment," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 237-255.
14. M. Burri-Nenova, 2008. "The long tale of the rainbow serpent: New technologies and the protection and promotion of traditional cultural expressions," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 205-236.
15. Fiona Cameron and Helena Robinson, 2007. "Digital knowledgescapes: Cultural, theoretical, practical and usage issues facing museum collection databases in a digital epoch," In: Fiona Cameron and Sarah Kenderdine (editors), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 165-192.
16. Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN), 1999. Like light through a prism: Analyzing commercial markets for cultural heritage content. Gatineau, Quebec: Canadian Heritage Information Network.
17. Kimberly Christen, 2009. "Access and accountability: The ecology of information sharing in the digital age," Anthropology News, volume 50, number 4, pp. 4-5.
18. Kimberly Christen, 2005. "Gone digital: Aboriginal remix and the cultural commons," International Journal of Cultural Property, volume 12, number 3, pp. 315-345.
19. Tim Cook, 2002. "Archives and privacy in a wired world: The impact of the Personal Information Act (Bill C-6) on archives," Archivaria, number 53, pp. 94-114.
20. Richard J. Cox and the University of Pittsburgh archives students, 2007. "Machines in the archives: Technology and the coming transformation of archival reference," First Monday, volume 12, number 11, at http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2029/1894, accessed 26 October 2010.
21. "Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0," at http://www.digitalhumanities.ucla.edu/images/stories/mellon_seminar_readings/manifesto20.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
22. Don A. Dillman, 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. Second edition. New York: Wiley.
23. Jean Dryden, 2009. "Copyright issues in the selection of archival material for Internet access," Archival Science, volume 8, number 2, pp. 123-147.
24. Jean Dryden, 2008. "Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet," unpublished PhD. disseration, University of Toronto.
25. Wendy M. Duff and Verne Harris, 2002. "Stories and names: Archival descriptions as narrating records and constructing meanings," Archival Science, volume 2, numbers 3-4, pp 263-285.
26. Michael Edson, 2009 "Web tech guy and the angry staff person: An exaggerated tale," presentation at the IMLS WebWise Conference, at http://www.slideshare.net/edsonm/web-tech-guy-and-angry-staff-person, accessed 26 October 2010.
27. Michael Edson and Rich Cherry, 2010, "Museum commons: Tragedy or enlightened self-interest?" In: Jennifer Trant and David Bearman (editors). Museums and the Web 2010: Proceedings, at http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/edson-cherry/edson-cherry.html, accessed 1 June 2010.
28. Kristin R. Eschenfelder, 2009. Controlling access to and use of online cultural collections: A survey of U.S. archives, libraries and museums for IMLS. Madison: University of Wisconsin, School of Library and Information Studies.
29. Kristin R. Eschenfelder and Grace Agnew, 2010. "Technologies employed to control access to or use of digital cultural collections: Controlled online collections," D-Lib Magazine, volume 16, numbers 1-2, at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/eschenfelder/01eschenfelder.html, accessed 26 October 2010.
30. Ronald D. Fricker and Matthias Schonlau, 2002. "Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature," Field Methods, volume 14, number 4, pp. 347-367.
31. Carole A. George, 2005. "Testing the barriers to digital libraries: A study seeking copyright permission to digitize published works," New Library World, volume 106, numbers 7-8, pp. 332-342.
32. Johanna Gibson, 2008. "The lay of the land: The geography of traditional cultural expression," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 182-201.
33. Martin A. Girsberger, 2008. "Legal protection of traditional cultural expressions: A policy perspective," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 123-149.
34. Christopher Beat Graber, 2008. "Using human rights to tackle fragmentation in the field of traditional cultural expressions: An institutional approach," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 96-120.
35. Ken Hamma, 2005. "Public domain art in an age of easier mechanical reproducibility," D-Lib Magazine, volume 11, number 11, at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/hamma/11hamma.html, accessed 1 January 2010.
36. Peter B. Hirtle, 2003. "Society of American Archivists Presidential address: Archives or assets?" at http://www.archivists.org/governance/presidential/hirtle.asp, accessed 1 January 2010.
37. Peter B. Hirtle with Tricia Donovan, 2009. "Removing all restrictions: Cornell's new policy on use of public domain reproductions," Research Library Issues, number 266, pp. 1-6, and at http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/rli-266-cornell.pdf, accessed 26 October 2010.
38. Peter B. Hirtle, Emily Hudson, and Andrew T. Kenyon, 2009. Copyright & cultural institutions: Guidelines for digitization for U.S. libraries, archives & museums. Cornell, N.Y.: Cornell University Library.
39. Sara S. Hodson, 2006. "Archives on the Web: Unlocking collections while safeguarding privacy," First Monday, volume 11, number 8, at http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1389/1307, accessed 1 January 2010.
40. Sara S. Hodson, 2004. "In secret kept, in silence sealed: Privacy in the papers of authors and celebrities," American Archivist, volume 67, number 2, pp. 194-211.
41. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), 2006. Status of technology and digitization in the nation's museums and libraries. Washington, D.C.: IMLS.
42. Magia Ghetu Krause and Elizabeth Yakel, 2007. "Interaction in virtual archives: The Polar Bear Expedition digital collections next generation finding aid," American Archivist, volume 70, number 2, pp. 282-314.
43. Lawrence Lessig, 2008. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.
44. Michelle Light and Tom Hyry, 2002. "Colophons and annotations: New directions for the finding aid," American Archivist, volume 65, number 2, pp. 216-230.
45. Nancy E. Loe, 2004. "Avoiding the golden fleece: Licensing agreements for archives," American Archivist, volume 67, number 1, pp. 58-85.
46. Clifford Lynch, 2002. "Digital collections, digital libraries and the digitization of cultural heritage information," First Monday, volume 7, number 5, at http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/949/870, accessed 1 January 2010.
47. Fiona Macmillan, 2008. "Human rights, cultural property and intellectual property: Three concepts in search of a relationship," In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 73-95.
48. Heather MacNeil, 1992. Without consent: The ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. Chicago: Society for American Archivists.
49. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, 2009. Best practices for access to images: Recommendations for scholarly use and publishing. Berlin: Max Plank Institute, at http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/PDF/MPIWGBestPracticesRecommendations.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
50. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, 2008. Workshop report: Scholarly publishing and the issues of cultural heritage, fair use, reproduction fees and copyrights. Berlin: Max Plank Institute, at http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/PDF/MPIWGWorkshop1-2008Report.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
51. Jason Mazzone, 2006. "Copyfraud," New York University Law Review, volume 81, number 3, pp. 1,026-1,100.
52. Open Knowledge Foundation. http://okfn.org/, accessed 26 October 2010.
53. Rina E. Pantalony, 2007. WIPO guide on managing intellectual property for museums. Geneva: World Intellectual Pproperty Organization, and at http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/museums_ip/guide.html, accessed 26 October 2010.
54. Hector Postigo, 2008. "Capturing fair use for the YouTube generation: The digital rights movement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the user-centered framing of fair use," Information Communication and Society, volume 11, number 7, pp. 1,008-1,027.
55. Public.Resource.Org, 2007. "Dear Internet, RE: SmithsonianImages.SI.edu" (19 May), at http://public.resource.org/memo.2007.05.19.html, accessed 1 January 2010.
56. Matthew Rimmer, 2006. "Robbery under arms: Copyright law and the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement," First Monday, volume 11, number 3, at http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1316/1236, accessed 26 October 2010.
57. Richard Rinehart, 2006. Nailing down bits: Digital art and intellectual property. Gatineau, Québec: Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN), and at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/CH56-4-4-2006E.pdf, accessed 26 October 2010.
58. Peter H. Roosen-Runge and Anna P. Roosen-Runge, 2003. The virtual display case: Making museum assets safely visible. Third edition. Hull, Québec: Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN), at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/Co61-17-2003E.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
59. Seamus Ross, Martin Donnelly, and Milena Dobreva, 2004. "Rights management and payment technologies," In: DigiCULT:Emerging Technologies for the Cultural and Scientific Heritage Sector Technology Watch, volume 2.
60. Miriam Sahlfeld, 2008. "Commercializing cultural heritage?" In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 256-286.
61. Susan Scafidi, 2005. Who Owns Culture? Appropriation and Authenticity in American Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
62. Melanie Schlosser, 2009. "Unless otherwise indicated: A survey of copyright statements on digital library collections," College & Research Libraries, volume 70, number 4, pp. 371-385.
63. Katie Shilton and Ramesh Srinivasan, 2007. "Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections," Archivaria, number 63, pp. 87-101.
64. Smithsonian Institution, 2009a. "Smithsonian 2.0 forum Webcast" (21 April), at http://smithsonian20.si.edu/forum.html, accessed 1 January 2010.
65. Smithsonian Insitution, 2009b. "Smithsonian Institution Web and new media strategy, version 1.0" (30 July), at http://smithsonian-webstrategy.wikispaces.com/file/view/20090729_Smithsonian-Web-New-Media-Strategy_v1.0.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
66. Daniel Sperling, 2008. Posthumous interests: Legal and ethical perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Ramesh Srinivasan, Robin Boast, Katherine M. Becvar, and Jonathan Furner, 2009. "Blobgects: Digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, volume 60, number 4, pp. 666-678.
68. Simone Tanner, 2004. Reproduction charging models & rights policy for digital images in American art museums: A Mellon Foundation study. London: KDCS Digital Consultancy.
69. Simone Tanner and Marilyn Deegan, 2003. "Exploring charging models for digital library cultural heritage," Ariadne, number 34, at http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue34/tanner/, accessed 26 October 2010.
70. Gunther Teubner and Andreas Fischer-Lescano, 2008. "Cannibalizing epistemes: Will modern law protect traditional cultural expression?" In: Christopher Beat Graber and Mira Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, pp. 17-48.
71. "Town hall meeting on intellectual property: Museum image licensing - the next generation," 2007. Museum Computer Network Conference, Chicago.
72. Jacqueline Trescott, 2006. "Smithsonian deal with Showtime passes muster: GAO finds researchers' access is unaffected," Washington Post (16 December), at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/15/AR2006121501894.html, accessed 26 October 2010.
73. Denise Troll Covey, 2005. Acquiring copyright permission to digitize and provide open access to books. Washington D.C.: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources.
74. Victoria and Albert Museum, n.d. "Terms & conditions," at http://collections.vam.ac.uk/information/information_termsandconditions, accessed March 2010.
75. Peter Walsh, 1997. "The Web and the unassailable voice," Museums and the Web 1997: Proceedings, at http://conference.archimuse.com/biblio/the_web_and_the_unassailable_voice, accessed 1 January 2010.
76. Peter Wienand, Anna Booy, and Robin Fry, 2000. A guide to copyright for museums and galleries. London: Routledge.
77. Eva Hemmungs Wirtén, 2008. Terms of use: Negotiating the jungle of the intellectual commons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
78. Mary Campbell Wojcik, 2008. "The antithesis of originality: Bridgeman, image licensors, and the public domain," Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal, volume 30, pp. 257-286.