Dynamic incident progression curve for classifying secondary traffic crashes

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1153-1158

  Sun, Carlos C ^a   Chilukuri, Venkat ^b  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b HDR Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Data processing; Traffic crashes; Traffic management; Traffic safety

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGIES; FILLING IN; FREEWAY CRASHES; INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; INCIDENT REPORTS; MASTER CURVE; NON-LINEAR REGRESSION; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SECONDARY CRASH; STATIC THRESHOLDS; TRAFFIC CRASHES; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; TYPE II; TYPE-I ERROR;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

DATA PROCESSING;

COLLISION; DATA PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

EID: 78449242555     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000187     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Garib A. Radwan A.E. Al-Deek H. Estimating magnitude and duration of incident delays. J. Transp. Eng. 1997, 123(6):459-466. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:6(459), and (.
2. Giuliano G. Incident characteristics, frequency, and duration on a high volume urban freeway. Transp. Res., Part A 1989, 23(5):387-396. TRAGDB, 0191-2607, 10.1016/0191-2607(89)90086-1.
3. Hirunyanitiwattana W. Mattingly S.P. Identifying secondary crash characteristics for the California highway system. Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2006, and Washington, D.C.
4. Karlaftis M.G. Latoski S.P. Richards N.J. Sinha K.C. Impacts on safety and traffic management (ITS): Investigation of secondary crash causes. ITS J. 1999, 5:39-52. ITSJF5, 1024-8072, and.
5. Khattak A.J. Wang X. Zhang H. Are incident durations and secondary incident occurrence interdependent?. Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2009, and Washington, D.C.
6. Lee C. Hellinga B. Saccomanno F. Proactive freeway crash prevention using real-time traffic control. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2003, 30:1034-1041. CJCEB8, 0315-1468, 10.1139/l03-040, and.
7. Lindley J. Urban freeway congestion: Quantification of the problem and effectiveness of potential solutions. ITE J. 1987, 57(1):27-32. ITEJDZ, 0162-8178.
8. Moore J.E. Giuliano G. Cho S. Secondary accident rates on Los Angeles freeways. J. Transp. Eng. 2004, 130(3):280-285. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:3(280), and.
9. Morales J. Analytical procedures for estimating freeway traffic congestion. ITE J. 1987, 57(1):45-49. ITEJDZ, 0162-8178.
10. Raub R.A. Secondary crashes: Important component of roadway incident management. Transp. Q. 1997, 51(3):93-104. TRQUDV, 0278-9434.
11. Skabardonis A. Petty K. Noeimi H. Rydzewski D. Varaiya P. I-880 field experiment: Database development and incident delay estimation procedures. 1996, and Transportation Research Record.1554, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
12. Smith B. Qin L. Venkatanarayana R. Characterization of freeway capacity reduction resulting from traffic accidents. J. Transp. Eng. 2003, 129(4):362-368. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(362), and.
13. Sullivan E. New model for predicting freeway incidents and incident delays. J. Transp. Eng. 1997, 123(4):267-275. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:4(267).
14. 2000, TRB, Highway capacity manual. Special Rep.209, National Research Council, Washington D.C.
15. Zhan C. Shen L. Hadi M. Gan A. Understanding the characteristics of secondary crashes on freeways. Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2008, and Washington, D.C.
16. Zhang H. Khattak A. What is the role of multiple secondary incidents in traffic operations?. Proc., Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2009, and Washington, D.C.