Selection for reduced muscle glycolytic potential in Large White pigs. I. Direct responses

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 469-480

  Roy, Pascale Le ^a   Larzul, Catherine ^a   Gogué, Jean ^a   Talmant, André ^a   Monin, Gabriel ^a   Sellier, Pierre ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Genetic parameters; Muscle glycolytic potential; Pig; Selection experiment

Indexed keywords

GLYCOGEN;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GLYCOLYSIS; MALE; MEAT; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCLE METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; PIERIS BRASSICAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 7844227332     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19980504     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bergmeyer H.U., in: Bourne G.H. (Ed.). Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1974, pp. 1127-1196.
2. Burlot T., Étude de la variabilité génétique du potentiel glycolytique du muscle dans deux lignées synthétiques porcines, Mémoire de fin d'études. ISA de Beauvais, 1994, 43 pp.
3. Charpentier J., Monin G., Ollivier L., Correlations between carcass characteristics and meat quality in Large White pigs, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Condition and Meat Quality of Pigs, Pudoc. Wageningen, 1971, pp. 255-260.
4. Dalrymple R.H., Hamm R., A method for the extraction of grycogen and metabolites from a single muscle sample, J. Food Technol. 8 (1973) 439-444.
5. Dalrymple R.H., Kastenschmidt L.L., Cassens R.G., Glycogen and phosphorylase in developing red and white muscle. Growth 37 (1973) 19-34.
6. De Vries A.G., van der Wal P.G., Lang T., Eikelenboom G., Merks J.W.M., Genetic parameters of pork qualitv and production traits in Yorkshire populations. Livest. Prod. Sci. 40 (1994) 277-289.
7. Fernandez X., Tornberg E., A review of the causes of variation in muscle glycogen content and ultimate pH in pigs. J- Muscle Foods 2 (1991) 209-235.
8. Groeneveld E., Kovac M., A generalized computing procedure for setting up and solving mixed linear models, J. Dairy Sci. 73 (1990) 513-531.
9. Henderson C.R., A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32 (1976) 69-83.
10. Hill W.G., Estimation of realised heritabilities from selection experiments. II. Selection in one direction. Biometrics 28 (1972) 767-780.
11. Hill W.G., Design of quantitative genetics selection experiments, in: Robertson A. (Ed.), Selection Experiments in Laboratory and Domestic Animals, Common-wealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK, 1980, pp. 1-13.
12. es Journées de la recherche porcine en France, Paris, 1-3 février 1984, Institut technique du porc, Paris, 1984, pp. 49-58.
13. Laborde D., Talmant A., Monin G., Activités enzymatiques métaboliques et contractiles de 30 muscles du Porc. Relations avec le pH ultime atteint après la mort, Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 25 (1985) 619-628.
14. Larzul C., Le Roy P., Monin G., Sellier P., Variabilité génétique du potentiel glycolytique du muscle chez le porc. Inra Prod. Anim. 11 (1998) 183-197.
15. Lefaucheur L., Le Dividich J., Mourot J., Monin G., Ecolan P., Krauss D., Influence of environmental temperature on growth, muscle and adipose tissue metabolism, and meat quality in swine, J. Anim. Sci. 69 (1991) 2844-2854.
16. es Journées de la recherche porcine en France, Paris, 1-3 février 1994, Institut technique du porc, Paris, 1994, pp. 311-314.
17. Le Roy P., Monin G., Elsen J.M., Caritez J.C., Talmant A., Lebret B., Lefaucheur L., Mourot J., Juin H., Sellier P., Effect of the RN genotype on growth and carcass traits in pigs, in: Van Arendonk J.A.M. (Ed.), Book Abstr. of the 47th E.A.A.P. Ann. Meeting, Wageningen Pers. Wageningen, the Netherlands, 1996.
18. Monin G., Sellier P., Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed, Meat Sci. 13 (1985) 49-63.
19. Monin G., Mejenes-Quijano A., Talmant A., Sellier P., Influence of breed and muscle metabolic type on muscle glycolytic potential and meat pH in pigs, Meat Sci. 20 (1987) 149-158.
20. Neumaier A., Groeneveld E., Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models, Genet. Sci. Evol. 30 (1998) 3-26.
21. es Journées de la recherche porcine en France, Paris, 19-21 février 1975, Institut technique du porc, Paris, 1975, pp. 293-302.
22. SAS®, SAS® Inst. Inc., Cary, NC. 1985.
23. Scheper J., Influence of environmental and genetic factors on meat quality, Acta Agric. Scand. suppl. 21 (1979) 20-31.
24. Searle S.R , Casella G., Mc Culloch C.E., Variance Components. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1992.
25. Sellier P., Monin G., Genetics of pig meat quality, a review, J. Muscle Foods 5 (1994) 187-219.
26. Sorensen D. A., Kennedy B.W., Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. J. Anim. Sci. 63 (1986) 245-258.
27. Talmant A., Fernandez X., Sellier P., Monin G., Glycolytic potential in Longissimus dorsi muscle of Large White pigs as measured after in vivo sampling, in: Proceedings of the 35th Int. Cong, Meat Sci. and Technol., Copenhagen, Danish Meat Research Institute, Roskilde, 1989, pp. 1129-1131.