Association between aneurysm shoulder stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: A longitudinal follow-up study

Circulation

Volumn 122, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1815-1822

  Li, Zhi Yong ^a,b   Sadat, Umar ^b   U King Im, Jean ^b   Tang, Tjun Y ^b   Bowden, David J ^b   Hayes, Paul D ^b   Gillard, Jonathan H ^b  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

aneurysm; aorta; mechanics; tomography

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WALL STRESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SHOULDER; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATION;

EID: 78349304362     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.939819     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Gillum RF. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1289-1298.
2. Minino AM, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007;55:1-119.
3. Valentine RJ, Decaprio JD, Castillo JM, Modrall JG, Jackson MR, Clagett GP. Watchful waiting in cases of small abdominal aortic aneu-rysms-appropriate for all patients? J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:441-448.
4. Powell JT, Brown LC, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Ruckley CV, Thompson SG. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus sur-veillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007;94:702-708.
5. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Messina LM, Gordon IL, Chute EP, Krupski WC, Busuttil SJ, Barone GW, Sparks S, Graham LM, Rapp JH, Makaroun MS, Moneta GL, Cambria RA, Makhoul RG, Eton D, Ansel HJ, Freischlag JA, Bandyk D. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1437-1444.
6. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet. 1998;352: 1649-1655.
7. Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT, Participants UKSAT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110:16-21.
8. Golledge J, Muller J, Daugherty A, Norman P. Abdominal aortic aneu-rysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2605-2613.
9. Vorp DA, Raghavan ML, Webster MW. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:632-639.
10. Li ZY, U-King-Im J, Tang TY, Soh E, See TC, Gillard JH. Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:928-935.
11. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:724-732.
12. Venkatasubramaniam AK, Fagan MJ, Mehta T, Mylankal KJ, Ray B, Kuhan G, Chetter IC, McCollum PT. A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28: 168-176.
13. Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, Cai YQ, Ferguson MS, Polissar NL, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;240: 464-472.
14. Leung JH, Wright AR, Cheshire N, Crane J, Thom SA, Hughes AD, Xu Y. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneu-rysms: a comparison with solid stress models. Biomed Eng Online. 2006;5:33.
15. Wolters BJ, Rutten MC, Schurink GW, Kose U, de Hart J, van de Vosse FN. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27:871-883.
16. Scotti CM, Shkolnik AD, Muluk SC, Finol EA. Fluid-structure inter-action in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online. 2005;4:64.
17. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:589-597.
18. Stringfellow MM, Lawrence PF, Stringfellow RG. The influence of aorta-aneurysm geometry upon stress in the aneurysm wall. J Surg Res. 1987;42:425-433.
19. Inzoli F, Boschetti F, Zappa M, Longo T, Fumero R. Biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7: 667-674.
20. Mower WR, Quinones WJ, Gambhir SS. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26: 602-608.
21. Collin J. The Oxford Screening Program for aortic aneurysm and screening first-order male siblings of probands with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;800:36-43.
22. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:760-769.
23. Wang DH, Makaroun M, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic an-eurysm. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123:536-539.
24. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech. 2000;33:475-482.
25. Di Martino ES, Vorp DA. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31:804-809.
26. Vande Geest JP, Wang DH, Wisniewski SR, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:1098-1106.
27. Huang H, Virmani R, Younis H, Burke AP, Kamm RD, Lee RT. The impact of calcification on the biomechanical stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 2001;103:1051-1056.
28. Li ZY, Howarth SP, Tang T, Gillard JH. How critical is fibrous cap thickness to carotid plaque stability? A flow-plaque interaction model. Stroke. 2006;37:1195-1199.
29. Li ZY, Howarth S, Trivedi RA, U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Brown A, Wang L, Gillard JH. Stress analysis of carotid plaque rupture based on in vivo high resolution MRI. J Biomech. 2006;39:2611-2622.
30. Li ZY, Howarth SP, Tang T, Graves MJ, U-King-Im J, Trivedi RA, Kirkpatrick PJ, Gillard JH. Structural analysis and magnetic resonance imaging predict plaque vulnerability: a study comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:768-775.
31. Budwig R, Elger D, Hooper H, Slippy J. Steady flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng. 1993;115:418-423.
32. Peattie RA, Asbury CL, Bluth EI, Riehle TJ. Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II: Wall stresses and their implication for in vivo thrombosis and rupture. J UltrasoundMed. 1996;15:689-696.
33. Choke E, Cockerill G, Wilson WR, Sayed S, Dawson J, Loftus I, Thompson MM. A review of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:227-244.
34. Asanuma K, Magid R, Johnson C, Nerem RM, Galis ZS. Uniaxial strain upregulates matrix-degrading enzymes produced by human vascular smoothmusclecells. Am journal ofphysiology. 2003;284:H1778-H1784.
35. Glagov S, Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Goudet CA, Vito RP. Mechanical determinants of plaque modeling, remodeling and disruption. Atherosclerosis. 1997;131(suppl):S13-S14.
36. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994;94: 2493-2503.
37. Lee RT, Schoen FJ, Loree HM, Lark MW, Libby P. Circumferential stress and matrix metalloproteinase 1 in human coronary atherosclerosis: implications for plaque rupture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16: 1070-1073.
38. Taddei F, Martelli S, Reggiani B, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Finiteelement modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:2194-2200.
39. Panagiotopoulou O, Curtis N, O'Higgins P, Cobb SN. Modelling sub-cortical bone in finite element analyses: a validation and sensitivity study in the macaque mandible. J Biomech. 2010;43:1603-11.