Effects of passive integrated transponder tags on smolt-to-adult recruit survival, growth, and behavior of hatchery spring chinook salmon

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 658-669

  Knudsen, Curtis M ^a   Johnston, Mark V ^b   Schroder, Steven L ^c   Bosch, William J ^b   Fast, David E ^b   Strom, Charles R ^d  

^a Oncorh Consulting   (United States)

^b Yakama Nation   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^d Yakama Nation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; GROWTH RATE; HATCHING; LIFE HISTORY; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MORTALITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SALMONID; SURVIVAL;

UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES]; YAKIMA RIVER;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 78349303778     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/M07-020.1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arnason, A. N., and K. H. Mills. 1981. Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly-Seber estimates for mark-recapture experiments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1077-1095.
2. Bell, G. R. 1964. A guide to the properties, characteristics, and uses of some general anaesthetics for fish. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 148:1-4.
3. Berggren, T., H. Franzoni, L. Basham, P. Wilson, H. Schaller, C. Petrosky, E. Weber, R. Boyce, and N. Bouwes. 2005. Comparative survival study (CSS) of hatchery PITtagged spring/summer Chinook: migration years 1997-2000 mark/recapture activities and bootstrap analysis. 2002 annual report, Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Agencies and Columbia Basin Tribes, Portland, Oregon.
4. Berggren, T., H. Franzoni, L. Basham, P. Wilson, H. Schaller, C. Petrosky, E. Weber, R. Boyce, and N. Bouwes. 2003. Comparative Survival Study (CSS) of PIT tagged Spring/ Summer Chinook. 2002 Annual Report, Migration Years 1997-2000 Mark/Recapture Activities and Bootstrap Analysis. Bonneville Power Administration Contract Number 8712702, Portland, Oregon.
5. Beverton, R. J. H., and S. J. Holt. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (Great Britain) Series 2 19.
6. Brakensiek, K. E., and D. G. Hankin. 2007. Estimating overwinter survival of juvenile Coho salmon in a northern California stream: accounting for effects of passive integrated transponder tagging mortality and size-dependent survival. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1423-1437.
7. Budy, P., G. P. Thiede, N. Bouwes, C. E. Petrosky, and H. Schaller. 2002. Evidence linking delayed mortality of Snake River salmon to their earlier hydrosystem experience. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:35-51.
8. Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, G. C. White, C. Brownie, and K. H. Pollock. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society, Monograph 5, Bethesda, Maryland.
9. Copeland, T., and J. Johnson. Idaho natural production monitoring and evaluation. Report of Research by Idaho Department of Fish and Game to Bonneville Power Administration, 2005-2006 Annual Report, Project Number 199107300 (BPA Report DOE/BP-00023363-1), Portland, Oregon.
10. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
11. Fast, D., D. Neeley, D. Lind, M. Johnston, C. Strom, W. Bosch, C. M. Knudsen, S. L. Schroder, and B. D. Watson. 2008. Survival comparison of spring Chinook salmon reared in a production hatchery under optimum conventional and seminatural conditions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:1507-1518.
12. ISAB (Independent Scientific Advisory Board). 2006. ISAB review of the 2005 comparative survival studies' annual report and applicability of comparative survival studies' analysis results. Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Columbia River Basin Indian Tribes, and National Marine Fisheries Service, Portland, Oregon.
13. Jefferts, K. B., P. K. Bergman, and H. F. Fiscus. 1963. A coded wire identification system for macro-organisms. Nature (London) 198(4879):460-462.
14. Knudsen, C. M., S. L. Schroder, C. A. Busack, M. V. Johnston, T. N. Pearsons, W. J. Bosch, and D. E. Fast. 2006a. Comparison of life-history traits between firstgeneration hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:1130-1144.
15. Knudsen, C. M., S. L. Schroder, M. V. Johnston, T. N. Pearsons, and C. R. Strom. 2006b. Comparison of gametic traits of first generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Pages 28-49 in C. M. Knudsen, editor. Yakima River Hatchery spring Chinook salmon, Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project monitoring and evaluation annual report 2005. Bonneville Power Administration Report DOE/BP-00022370-4, Portland, Oregon.
16. Krebs, C. J. 1998. Ecological methodology, 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
17. McDonald, T. L., S. C. Amstrup, and B. F. J. Manly. 2003. Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:814-822.
18. McFarlane, G. A., R. S. Wydoski, and E. D. Prince. 1990. Historical review of the development of external tags and marks. Pages 9-29 in N. C. Parker, A. E. Giorgi, R. C. Heidinger, D. B. Jester, Jr., E. D. Prince, and G. A. Winans, editors. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 7, Bethesda, Maryland.
19. Muir, W. D., S. G. Smith, J. G. Williams, and E. E. Hockersmith. 2001. Survival estimates for migrant yearling Chinook salmon and steelhead tagged with passive integrated transponders in the lower Snake and lower Columbia rivers, 1993-1998. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:269-282.
20. Pearsons, T. N., C. L. Johnson, B. B. James, and G. M. Temple. 2004. Spring Chinook salmon interactions indices and residual/precocial monitoring in the upper Yakima Basin. Annual Report to the Bonneville Power Administration, Project Number 1995-063-25, Report DOE/BPA-00013756-5, Portland, Oregon.
21. Prentice, E., T. A. Flagg, and C. S. Clinton. 1990. Equipment, methods, and an automated data-entry station for PIT tagging. Pages 335-340 in N. C. Parker, A. E. Giorgi, R. C. Heidinger, D. B. Jester, Jr., E. D. Prince, and G. A. Winans, editors. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 7, Bethesda, Maryland.
22. Prentice, E. F., D. J. Maynard, P. Sparks-McConkey, C. S. McCutcheon, D. Neff, W. Steffens, F. W. Waknitz, A. L. Jensen, L. C. Stuehrenberg, S. L. Downing, B. Sandford, and T. W. Newcomb. 1993. A comparison of the marine survival, maturation strategies, growth, and tag retention of coho salmon tagged with PIT or coded-wire tags. Pages 50-61 in A study to determine the biological feasibility of a new fish tagging system. Bonneville Power Administration Annual report for 1989, Project Number 83-319, Contract Number DE-AI79-84BP11982, Portland, Oregon.
23. Prentice, E. F., D. J. Maynard, S. L. Downing, D. A. Frost, M. S. Kellett, D. A. Bruland, P. Sparks-McConkey, F. W. Waknitz, R. N. Iwamoto, K. McIntyre, and N. Paasch. 1994. Comparison of long-term effects of PIT tags and CW tags on coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Pages 123-137 in A study to determine the biological feasibility of a new fish tagging system. Bonneville Power Administration Annual report for 1990-1993, BPA Report DOE/BP-11982-5, Portland, Oregon.
24. Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191:1-382.
25. Robson, D. S., and H. A. Regier. 1966. Estimates of tag loss from recoveries of fish tagged and permanently marked. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 95:56-59.
26. Rotella, J. J., and J. E. Hines. 2005. Effects of tag loss on direct estimates of population growth rate. Ecology 86:821-827.
27. Scheaffer, R. L., W. Mendenhall, and L. Ott. 1979. Elementary survey sampling, 2nd edition. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts.
28. Seber, G. A. F. 1982. Estimation of animal abundance and other related parameters, 2nd edition. Charles Griffin, London.
29. Sharpe, C. S., D. A. Thompson, H. L. Blankenship, and C. B. Schreck. 1998. Effects of routine handling and tagging procedures on physiological stress responses in juvenile Chinook salmon. Progressive Fish-Culturist 60:81-87.
30. Skalski, J. R., S. G. Smith, R. N. Iwamoto, J. G. Williams, and A. Hoffmann. 1998. Use of passive integrated transponder tags to estimate survival of migrant juvenile salmonids in the Snake and Columbia rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1484-1493.
31. Williams, J. G., S. G. Smith, R. W. Zabel, W. D. Muir, M. D. Scheuerell, B. P. Sandford, D. M. Marsh, R. A. McNatt, and S. Achord. 2005. Effects of the federal Columbia River power system on salmonid populations. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-63.
32. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.